Breaking News

While you “Stayed at Home to Protect the NHS”, your Government killed the Elderly & Vulnerable, then lied by telling you they were COVID Deaths; & Documents prove it was years in the planning

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Whilst you stayed at home and believed you were protecting the NHS, your Government was deliberately making decisions that would ensure thousands of the elderly and vulnerable would suffer premature deaths in care homes.

Without those deaths, you would have questioned the logic of ever staying at home to decimate the economy and destroy lives. What your Government did amounts to murder. But they covered it up with lies that they had all died of Covid-19.

Now official documents that were meant to be kept secret have been released under the Freedom of Information Act, and they reveal that the forced euthanasia of the elderly and vulnerable in response to a pandemic had been years in the planning.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


As soon as the lockdown was declared in the United Kingdom on March 23rd 2020 deaths occurring in care homes in the weeks that followed skyrocketed compared to what had occurred in the previous five years. You were led to believe this was because of Covid-19, but the evidence shows otherwise.

Official figures provided by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that care homes recorded a 21% rise in deaths from all causes in 2020, with nearly 25,000 more deaths than expected.

Nearly 19,000 of those deaths were labelled as being due to Covid-19. But excluding the alleged coronavirus, other care home deaths were 5% up on the five-year average.

ONS figures below show that in the week ending 17th April 2020 there were 7,028 deaths recorded in care homes, of which 2438 were due to Covid-19.

Source
Click to expand

But fast forward a year and as seen in the ONS figures below, the week ending 16th April 2021 saw 1,640 deaths recorded in care homes, of which 51 were allegedly due to Covid-19.

Source
Click to expand

When we remove the alleged Covid-19 deaths from the figures for the week ending 17th April 2020 we can see that 4,590 deaths due to all other causes occurred in care homes.

This is an increase of 3,001 deaths on the number recorded in care homes due to all causes during the same week in the following year (week ending 16th April 2021). This pattern is consistent throughout the next 3 months of 2020 when compared to the same time frame in 2021.

But why were there so many deaths in care homes due to other causes at the height of the alleged first wave?

The answer is simple, the Government and its medical and scientific advisors, and NHS chiefs had a plan, and that plan was to withdraw care, refuse treatment, and put the elderly and vulnerable on the end-of-life pathway.

A pathway that involved the withdrawal of all medication, food and water, and the administration of a cocktail of midazolam and morphine. A pathway that saw them die due to an overdose of drugs alongside starvation, and dehydration.

Several things happened at the beginning of the alleged pandemic, and they were all planned years in advance.

Whilst all this was happening Matt Hancock (the Health Secretary at the time) and Chris Whitty (the Chief Medical Officer) instructed hospitals to discharge as many patients as possible into care homes, the very place the patients loved ones were now banned from visiting, the very place a doctor was not required to visit to certify a death, the very place carers could not be held liable for a death as long as it was just suspected to be Covid-19.

They also purchased a two-year supply of a drug called midazolam. A supply that was depleted by October 2020.

Midazolam is a drug that is questionably used in end-of-life care, and it was also used in end-of-life care for Covid-19, despite the fact it causes respiratory depression and respiratory arrest.

The above graph shows the total number of out-of-hospital prescriptions for midazolam and it also shows all-cause excess deaths in the UK from January 2020 through to March 2021.

We told you that whilst you stayed at home to protect the NHS, they were giving midazolam to the elderly and vulnerable, and telling you they were Covid-19 deaths, the above graph certainly shows a strong correlation, but now sensitive, confidential documents that the NHS did not want anybody to see prove the causation.

In 2016 the NHS drew up plans to withdraw hospital care for nursing home residents in the event of a pandemic.

The documents show that in the event of a pandemic care would be prioritised by the number of years of life lost. This meant that a teenager who suffered appendicitis would be offered a bed in the hospital and treated as required. However, the documents clearly state that the elderly would be denied treatment and put on the end-of-life pathway.

The documents also highlight that the NHS’s estimation of deaths in care homes due to their planned actions in response to a pandemic was a massive underestimation of what was seen once It was put into practice in response to the alleged Covid-19 pandemic.

Within a summary of the document the NHS state that over the duration of a wave they estimate 5,500 – 5,800 deaths would occur in care homes.

In reality, there were 2,000 more deaths recorded in just a single week during the first alleged wave of Covid-19, than what the NHS expected to occur during the entirety of a wave.

The confidential documents also show that the NHS planned to reduce services in response to a pandemic and only maintain life-critical services. This meant they would switch to palliation and end-of-life care. In 2017 the NHS recognised they did not have enough trained staff to deliver end-of-life care, so they developed training packages that could be rapidly rolled out during a pandemic, and trained staff who were “interested” in the meantime.

The confidential NHS documents clearly show that the elderly and vulnerable were to be denied treatment and put on the end-of-life pathway in response to a pandemic, and the evidence clearly shows this was put into practice.

In relation to deaths of people with learning difficulties the ONS said – ‘the largest effect was associated with living in a care home or other communal establishment.

Having a learning difficulty and being in care doesn’t mean you are more likely to die of Covid-19. What it means is that you are much more likely to have a DNR order placed on you without informing yourself or your family, which Carers / NHS staff then use as permission to put you on end-of-life care.

We know this happened because an Amnesty report and CQC (Care Quality Comission) report said so.

The Amnesty report states that –

‘Care home managers and staff and relatives of care home residents in different parts of the country told Amnesty International how, in their experience, sending residents to hospital was discouraged or outright refused by hospitals, ambulance teams, and GPs. A manager in Yorkshire said: “We were heavily discouraged from sending residents to hospital. We talked about it in meetings; we were all aware of this.”’

Another manager in Hampshire recalled:
There wasn’t much option to send people to hospital. We managed to send one patient to hospital because the nurse was very firm and insisted that the lady was too uncomfortable and we could not do any more to make her more comfortable but the hospital could. In hospital the lady tested COVID positive and was treated and survived and came back. She is 92 and in great shape.
She explained that:
There was a presumption that people in care homes would all die if they got COVID, which is wrong. It shows how little the government knows about the reality of care homes.

‘The son of one care home resident who passed away in Cumbria said that sending his father to hospital had not even been considered:
From day one, the care home was categoric it was probably COVID and he would die of it and he would not be taken to hospital. He only had a cough at that stage. He was only 76 and was in great shape physically. He loved to go out and it would not have been a problem for him to go to hospital. The care home called me and said he had symptoms, a bit of a cough and that doctor had assessed him over mobile phone and he would not be taken to hospital. Then I spoke to the GP later that day and said h would not be taken to hospital but would be given morphine if in pain. Later he collapsed on the floor in
the bathroom and the care home called the paramedic who established that he had no injury and put him back to bed and told the carers not to call them back for any Covid-related symptoms because they would not return. He died a week later.
He was never tested. No doctor ever came to the care home. The GP assessed him over the phone. In an identical situation for someone living at home instead of in a care home, the advice was “go to hospital”. The death certificate says pneumonia and COVID, but pneumonia was never mentioned to us.’

A care home manager in Yorkshire told Amnesty International:
In March, I tried to get [a resident] into hospital—the ambulance had employed a doctor to do triage but they said, “Well he’s end of life anyway so we’re not going to send an ambulance” … Under normal circumstances he would have gone to hospital … I think he was entitled to be admitted to hospital. These are individuals who have contributed to society all their lives and were denied the respect and dignity that you would give to a 42-year-old; they were [considered] expendable.

The CQC felt it necessary to issue a statement in August 2020 addressing the issue of inappropriate DNR’s being placed on care home residents without informing the resident or their family –

‘It is vitally important that older and disabled people living in care homes and in the community can access hospital care and treatment for COVID-19 and other conditions when they need it during the pandemic … Providers should always work to prevent avoidable harm or death for all those they care for. Protocols, guidelines and triage systems should be based on equality of access to care and treatment. If they are based on assumptions that some groups are less entitled to care and treatment than others, this would be discriminatory. It would also potentially breach human rights, including the
right to life, even if there were concerns that hospital or critical care capacity may be reached.’

That statement was issued because the CQC found that 34% of people working in health and social care were pressured into placing ‘do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) orders on Covid-19 patients who suffered from disabilities and learning difficulties, without involving the patient or their families in the decision.

The evidence suggests that in reality you were ordered to stay at home, to protect the NHS, so that they could prematurely end the lives of the elderly and vulnerable and tell you that they were Covid-19 deaths.

The confidential documents finally released by the NHS have just proven it.

Share this page to Telegram
5 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

20 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Harry Brook
Harry Brook
2 months ago

My Friend mom makes 45 US dollars an hour on the internet . She has been out of w0rk for eight months but last month her pay check was 11,000 just w0rking on the internet for a few hours. Simply give it a shot on
the accompanying article… https://indeedgold.blogspot.com/

Cyn
Cyn
2 months ago

They should be paraded through the streets in a cage so that victim’s families can address them and then, hung in a public square.

Richard Parker
Richard Parker
Reply to  Cyn
2 months ago

YES!! And they should be hung without a hood over their heads so that we can see their faces at moment of their deaths.

Mig
Mig
Reply to  777
1 month ago

Well… fortunately the governments have found, in the last few minutes before they were completely F*** somebody to blaim in stead of themselves…

It is incredibly stupid and not possible at all, but to pretend to have no reason at all was no longer being accepted, because everbody can see the increase starts with the introduction of the not at all vaxxes

Im joking of course, but I write it down because acting the way they do now bij not acting at all…is in fact really even more stupid than my idea…

Mike
Mike
2 months ago

And now, after they killed the infirm – they are going after all and sundry over 50! Don believe it?
Read here: https://expose-news.com/2022/10/01/over-50-then-your-government-wants-you-dead/
So, don’t get dick, don’t get old – of start to fight back now! This 50+ rule must include a huge portion of the HoC and HoL, plus all ciVile servants – so what can be done? Raise hell with your MP for a start! Let them know WE KNOW what they’re doing! Legalised (?) MURDER! What else can you call it?
Don’t expect the Met Police to do ANYTHING, they’re so corrupted over the last few years the don’t know whether they’re coming or going! As to upholding the Law of This Land – forget it! They’re also too busy fighting various claims of their corruption they’ve not got their mind on the reality of what is happening!
I’m sure there are honest MPs in there, but only by letting them know WE KNOW will they be forced into action!

janna
janna
2 months ago

Had we known then what we know now we would never have stayed home nor would we have had the so called “vaccination”. They are all a bunch of crooks and pray they must pay soon

Andy
Andy
Reply to  janna
2 months ago

Respectfully, people were saying this in the spring and early summer of 2020. They were warning about the mandatory and coerced vaccinations coming that are designed to cull the population and to push the agenda of digital control. We were ridiculed and humiliated. Others got vaxxed. I hope that you treat it. We should all repent, seek God and follow Jesus Christ, because God’s judgment is upon us.

Drench
Drench
2 months ago

Nuremberg II

Michele Baillie
Michele Baillie
2 months ago

Theresa May was Home Services Minister- and I believe; was overseeing the NHS when all this was being developed (since at least 2012)

uftonwood
uftonwood
2 months ago

How many of us, ignorant of medicine, bought the covid19 story? I did before finding the truth on the web, a web that tolerates sites like expose while they collect the details of all us un-vacced. When these sites are taken down the next knock on your door will be from the death squad.

777
777
2 months ago

Yup that pretty much sums it up. Guess what they will do it all over again wait and see. You all masked up for a lie, that is breaking the commandments of God. But most don’t believe in God anymore to their hurt!

Adam
Adam
2 months ago

As the tide turns, a lot of us are realising we are at the juncture of people gaining an awareness of the true power structure that dominated the planet. Things have changed, elites have been forcibly shifted. Hold tight, respond surely and decisively. Just because a programmed muppet is hostile to you you are clever enough to realise they are battling aspects of their own psyche and they are utilising you as the medium to deal with it. Aeonic movements are at play. I woul suggest an understanding of “self importance” as explored un castenadas writings is a concept that should be understood. This may give you a glimpse of some of the archetypal patterns that are at play. Individually and collectively. What a brilliant website, a light in the saturated desert of darkness. Hold tight people. Hate and destroy your enemy, love your fellows. Be honest, true.

trackback
2 months ago

[…] While you “Stayed at Home to Protect the NHS”, your Government killed the Elderly & Vulnera… […]

Gloria Hington
Gloria Hington
2 months ago

Great

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Click here to visit: While you ‘Stayed at Home to Protect the NHS’, your Government killed the Elderly &… […]