Breaking News

FACT: The COVID Virus was made in a BioLab & Fauci, Bill Gates & Moderna are all responsible

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

There is no question that SARS-CoV 2 (causing Covid-19) is man-made.

The following article contains a collection of information/evidence displayed in no particular order that proves this beyond a reasonable doubt.

Here is that evidence…

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

U.S. D.O.D. issued a contract for COVID-19 Research in Ukraine in November 2019

The U.S. Government’s “USA Spending” website reveals that it had spent a staggering $4.04 trillion “in response to COVID-19”. A deeper look at the website’s “Award Search” feature uncovers a contract awarded by the Department of Defense to Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. for “Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services” on September 20, 2012.

A closer examination of the contract’s “Sub-Awards” tab reveals 115 transactions with recipients and brief descriptions, the majority of which are mundane items like “laboratory equipment for Kyiv” and “office furniture for Kyiv.”

Click to enlarge

There is, however, among the 115 transactions listed in the “Sub-Awards” tab of a contract awarded by the U.S. Department of Defense to Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. one transaction that stands out:

An award to Labyrinth Global Health INC for “SME Manuscript Documentation and COVID-19 Research.”

While it is not surprising to see an award for Covid-19 research during a pandemic, the fact that the contract was awarded on November 12, 2019, at least one month before the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus and three months before it was officially named Covid-19, raises questions about the government’s knowledge of the virus.

Furthermore, the contract was instructed to take place in Ukraine, as was the entire contract awarded to Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. These findings suggest potential U.S. Government involvement in the creation and spread of the virus.

In September 2012, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) within the US Department of Defense awarded a contract to a global engineering, procurement, and construction company specializing in infrastructure development.

The contract was for a Biological threat reduction program in Ukraine, and concluded in October 2020. While the details are unclear, it is known that $21.7 million of the $116.6 million contract was spent on this program.

It is puzzling why the DOD would contract a company specializing in infrastructure development for a biological threat reduction program.

Furthermore, it is intriguing that both the DOD and the contracting company subsequently paid Labyrinth Global Health INC to conduct COVID-19 research in Ukraine prior to the emergence of the novel coronavirus and before it was officially named Covid-19.

These events raise questions about the nature of the biological threat reduction program and its potential connection to the alleged COVID-19 pandemic. And the discovery of a contract awarded by the U.S. Department of Defense for Covid-19 research in November 2019 suggests that the U.S Government either knew the virus existed naturally or was involved in constructing it in a lab.

Bill Gates is not a Scientist or a Doctor, yet he is the undisputed King of the Public Health

Moderna confirmed in 2016 that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation had granted them $20 million to support their “initial project related to the evaluation of antibody combinations in a preclinical setting as well as the conduct of a first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trial of a potential mRNA medicine”.

But Moderna also revealed that the framework agreement they made with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation could bring the total funding up to $100 million for “follow-on projects” that are proposed to and approved by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation up to 2022.

And the terms of this agreement stipulate that Moderna are obliged to grant the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation certain non-exclusive licenses.

A Non-Exclusive Licence grants the licensee the right to use the intellectual property, but means that the licensor remains free to exploit the same intellectual property and to allow any number of other licensees to also exploit the same intellectual property.

Therefore under the terms of the agreement made with Moderna, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have now been granted a non-exclusive license to the Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injection, and are therefore profiting from its use.

But guess what. The Moderna COVID Vaccine was already ready in early December 2019.

Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and Moderna had a coronavirus candidate in December 2019

A confidentiality agreement reveals that NIAID and Moderna agreed to transfer “mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates” to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill on December 12, 2019.

The material transfer agreement was signed the December 12th 2019 by Ralph Baric, PhD, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and then signed by Jacqueline Quay, Director of Licensing and Innovation Support at the University of North Carolina on December 16th 2019.

The agreement was also signed by two representatives of the NIAID, one of whom was Amy F. Petrik PhD, a technology transfer specialist who signed the agreement on December 12th 2019 at 8:05 am. The other signatory was Barney Graham MD PhD, an investigator for the NIAID, however, this signature was not dated.

The final signatories on the agreement were Sunny Himansu, Moderna’s Investigator, and Shaun Ryan, Moderna’s Deputy General Counsel. Both signatures were made on December 17th 2019.

All of these signatures were made prior to the general public having any knowledge of the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus.

A Brief History of man-made pathogens designed by Baric, Daszak, Zhengli and Moderna and funded by Fauci, the NIH, the NIAID and the US Government to carry out the research necessary for the creation of SARS, MERS and Covid-19

1984: Dr Anthony Fauci is appointed director of the NIAID (National Institute of Allergies and Infectious diseases) – There is an Orwellian Appointment for you.

1986 July1: 1986 – 1999 funding amounts not specified and then funded by $1,987,840 over 7 years from 2000 to 2007 excluding 2002.
NIAID (National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases) funding Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Subject: Mechanism of MHV Replication (Mouse Hepatitis Virus). This was the start of the partnership between Fauci and Baric.

1999: U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services (HHS) funds research amplifying the infectious character of Coronaviruses.

1999: The Bill and Mellisa Gates Foundation set up GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization) with a promise of $750 million in funding. So it was never going to be a bit part actor in the vaccine movie. – 

2000: In May Ralph Baric successfully constructs a 28k base pair Coronavirus from smaller fragments by reverse transcription (making DNA from RNA)  He makes an infectious TGE (Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus – which is a type of Coronavirus) clone from isolated components of the genome. He files for US Patent 6,593,111 B2: The invention is exemplified by, although not limited to, the assembly of full-length, functional coronavirus genomes.

The present inventors have successfully assembled a full-length infectious clone of transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGE). Using a novel approach, six adjoining cDNA subclones that span the entire TGE genome were isolated. Each clone was engineered with unique flanking interconnecting junctions which dictate a precise, systematic assembly with only the correct adjacent cDNA subclones, resulting in an intact TGE cDNA construct of about approximately 28.5 Kb in length – .

Among other advantages, full-length infectious clones of TGE permit the precise genetic modification of the coronavirus genome –

2001: April 20: NIH Grant GM63228 funds Ralph Baric et al at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to do Chimera research to transform the original SARS Coronavirus which was pathogenic only to animals, existing in nature as a pathogen for dogs and rabbits, to make it pathogenic to mankind targeting lung epithelial cells. The justification for this research was that it was supposedly designed as a vector virus to distribute HIV vaccines. This resulted in US patent application US28531801P

2001 May21: Ralph Baric and Boyd Yount (Assigned to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) file US Patent 6,593,111 B2 Directional Assembly of Large Viral Genomes and Chromosomes  The Patent Office search report found: Lai, Michael M.C “The making of infectious viral RNA: No size limit in sight” PNAS vol 97 No 10, May 9, 2000 pp 5025-5027 And it found: Thiel et al “Infectious RNA transcribed in vitro from a cDNA copy of human coronavirus genome cloud in vaccinia virus 92: 1273-1261 (2001)

2002: April 19: The University of North Carolina files US patent 7279327 for an infectious replication defective coronavirus (to be used as a virus vector for an HIV vaccine), claiming priority from US28531801P. Inventors were: Kristopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, Ralph S. Baric 
2002 November 16: The first case of an atypical pneumonia is reported in the Guangdong province in southern China.  

2003 February 25: First cases of unusual pneumonia reported in Hanoi, Vietnam.

2003 February 28: WHO officer Carlo Urbani, MD, examines an American businessman with an unknown form of pneumonia in a French hospital in Hanoi, Vietnam.

2003 March10: Urbani reports an unusual outbreak of the illness, which he calls sudden acute respiratory syndrome or SARS, to the main office of the WHO. He notes that the disease has infected an unusually high number of healthcare workers (22) at the hospital (in Hanoi, Vietnam).

2003 March11: A similar outbreak of a mysterious respiratory disease is reported among healthcare workers in Hong Kong.

2003 March15: WHO issues a heightened global health alert about the mysterious pneumonia with a case definition of SARS after cases in Singapore and Canada are also identified. The alert includes a rare emergency travel advisory to international travellers, healthcare professionals and health authorities.

2003 March17:  An international network of 11 leading laboratories is established to determine the cause of SARS and develop potential treatments.

2003 March24: CDC officials present the first evidence that a new strain of a virus most frequently associated with upper respiratory infections and the common cold in humans called the coronavirus might be a likely cause of SARS.

2003 March29: Carlo Urbani, who identified the first cases of SARS, dies as a result of the disease. Researchers later suggest naming the agent that causes the disease after the infectious disease expert.

2003 April4: President George W. Bush adds SARS to the list of quarantinable diseases, which gives the CDC the authority to isolate persons who might have been exposed to the disease.

2003 April12: Canadian researchers announce they have completed the first successful sequencing of the genome of the coronavirus believed to cause SARS.

2003 April14: CDC officials announce their laboratories have sequenced a nearly identical strain of the SARS-related coronavirus. The CDC version includes an additional 15 nucleotides, which provides the important beginning of the sequence.

2003 April16: A new form of a coronavirus never before seen in humans is confirmed as the cause of SARS according to Koch’s postulates, which are four specific conditions that must be met for a pathogen to be confirmed as a causal agent of disease.

2003 April 25: CDC Patent filed and ultimately becomes US 7,220,852 (the patent on the RNA sequence) and 7,776,521 (the patent on the testing methodology). These patents give the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services the ability to control the commercial exploitation of SARS coronavirus. 

2003 July2: WHO removes Toronto, Canada from its list of areas with recent local SARS transmission after 20 days passed since the last SARS case was reported and isolated.

2003 January26: Dr. Anthony Fauci appointed to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Grand Challenges Scientific Advisory Board (served through 2010 – when he joined their Global Vaccine Action Plan). 

2006 Chinese researchers combine HCV, HIV-1, SARS-CoV-1 & SARS-CoV-2: Huang Q, Cheng Y, Guo Q, Li Q. Preparation of a Chimeric Armored RNA as a Versatile Calibrator for Multiple Virus Assays. Clinchem 2006; 52(7):1446-1448 and Supplement A.Inform1999200020022003.

2007: NSF Grant IIS-0513650 (Italy, France and Indiana University) study addresses FIRST CRITICAL STEP to control a pandemic – shutdown International Travel. Given this knowledge why did Fauci tell Trump a Travel Ban was unnecessary? 

2009 April15: ModernaTX INC is incorporated in Delaware USA

2010 August 6: Moderna (prior to its establishment) files U.S. Patent 9,447,164 which attracted the investment of (and “inventorship” for) venture capitalists at Flagship Ventures. This patent grew out of the work of Dr. Jason P. Schrum of Harvard Medical School supported by National Science Foundation Grant #0434507. While the application claims priority to August 2010, the application didn’t get finalized until October, 2015.

2010 September21: Wildlife Trust is rebranded to become ECO Health Alliance under the directorship of Peter Daszak.

2010: The World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have announced a collaboration to increase coordination across the international vaccine community and create a Global Vaccine Action Plan.
The Leadership Council is comprised of:
Dr. Margaret Chan, Director General of WHO;
Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, Director of NIAID, part of the National Institutes of Health;
Mr. Anthony Lake, Executive Director for UNICEF; 
Ms. Joy Phumaphi, Chair of the International Advisory Committee and Executive Secretary, African Leaders Malaria Alliance
Dr. Tachi Yamada, President of Global Health at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation 

2011 March9: ModernaTX (MODEfied RNA) was registered in Massachussetts 

2012 September22: UK Identifies first case of MERS

2012-April2: Moderna claims priority to US201261618957P in its 5 patents cited below all of which refer to a double CGG codon Furin Cleavage site.

2013 December 16: Moderna files 4 patents referring to a double CGG codon Furin Cleavage site.
US9149506B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding septin-4 –
US9216205B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding granulysin –
US9255129B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding SIAH E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 –
US9301993B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding apoptosis inducing factor 1 –

2013: Baric and Chinese scientists isolate 3 coronaviruses from bats with HKU4 spike protein – unable to infect human cells. Yang Y…Baric RS, et al. Receptor usage and cell entry of bat coronavirus HKU4 provide insight into bat-to-human transmission of MERS coronavirus. PNAS 2014;111(34):12516-12521. Funded with NIH grants RO1AI089728 & R21AI109094.

2014 October 17: Obama Administration halts Gain-of-Function Research

2015 Dr. Zhengli et al “reengineered HKU4 spike aiming to build its capacity to infect human cells.” “To this end, we introduced two single mutations…mutations in these motifs in coronavirus spikes have demonstrated dramatic effects on viral entry into human cells.” 

2015: Baric and Zhengli announce they can make a more dangerous, virulent and infectious virus. Two Mutations Were Critical for Bat-to-Human Transmission of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS). J Virol.2015;89(17):9199-9123. Funded by NIH grants RO1AI089728, RO1AI110700. 

2015 July: South Korea had its last case of MERS. There were 2,494 confirmed laboratory cases and a total of 858 deaths in 27 countries; 80% of these cases came from Saudi Arabia. So the mortality rate for MERS was 34.4%. But it was not very transmissible. Infections were limited to family members, other hospital patients and health care workers who encountered MERS patients.

2016 June2: Moderna files US9587003B2 referring to a double CGG codon Furin Cleavage site: Modified polynucleotides for the production of oncology-related proteins and peptides  – 

2017: Gain-of-Function Research Ban Lifted

2018: US Patent 7279327 for the chimeric adaption of the naturally occurring animal SARS Coronavirus to become infectious to humans targeting lung epithelial cells is transferred from University of North Carolina to he US National Institute for Health (NIH) – who funded it in the first place.

2018 March 27: Peter Daszac and the Eco Health Alliance in 2018 submitted a proposal to DARPA to do gain of function research on SARS coronaviruses to insert is furin cleavage site (such as is found in HIV1) in an optimal position into the coronavirus gene. COVID-19 has a furin cleavage site optimally positioned to infect humans.

Let’s look at the big picture: A novel SARS coronavirus emerges in Wuhan with a novel cleavage site in it. We now have evidence that, in early 2018, they had pitched inserting novel cleavage sites into novel SARS-related viruses in their lab,” said Chan. “This definitely tips the scales for me. And I think it should do that for many other scientists too.”  – this is the Eco health alliance DARPA funding proposal.

Oh dear. That really nails it. DARPA confirms that Peter Daszac of the Eco Health Alliance submitted a proposal on 2018March27 to add an HIV1 type furin cleavage site to SARS1. SARS CoV 2 has that furin cleavage site. In fact the double CGG codon Furin cleavage site is the main difference between Covid-19 and the Bat Coronavirus RaGT13. Fauci funded Wuhan through the Eco Health Alliance. 

Here is Peter Daszak admitting that he and Ralph Baric made new forms of SARS in the lab

The Daily Mail said of this proposal – The most alarming aspect of the research plan revealed in the documents is a plan to search viral genetic databases for new types of ‘furin cleavage sites’ which help a virus attack a host. According to the proposal, ‘high-risk’ versions of these sites, once identified, would then be grafted onto SARS-like bat coronaviruses via genetic engineering. This revelation is alarming because SARS-CoV-2, the virus which causes COVID-19, has just such a furin cleavage site, which increases its power and deadliness, but a similar feature has never been observed in other SARS-like coronaviruses in nature.

Actually the double CGG codon Furin Cleavage site does not exist in ANY virus in nature. And this proposal nails Peter Daszak/ECO Health Allinace at the creator of SARS CoV 2 and Covid-19. which differs from the Bat Coronavirus RaTG13 only by the insertion of double CGG Codon Furin cleavage site and by other smaller deviations all of which are 3 or less base pairs (1 codon) long –  

2018: Zhengli presents research at Shanghai Jiao Tong University on 14 Nov. 2018 entitled “Studies on Bat Coronavirus and its cross-species infection.” This presentation has since been deleted from the University website. 

2019 March 28: Moderna files their final patent application for their gene therapy mRNA-1273 (amino acid chain) Covid-19 vaccine, 6 months before the outbreak of the disease.-

US 10,703,789 filed January 12 2019
US 10,702,600 filed February 28 2020
US 10,577,403 filed June 12 2019
US 10,442,756 filed December 18 2017
US 10,266,485 filed June 11 2018
US 10,064,959 filed April 21 2017
US 9,868,692 filed July 27, 2017

The 2nd patent, filed on February 28 2020 was a continuation of an earlier patent application number 16/368,270 which was filed on March 28, 2019 

2019August 7: Fort Detrick in Maryland  si the centre of all US bio weapons production. On August 7th, 2019, its deadly germ research operations were abruptly shutdown following serious safety violations, in particular relating to the disposal of dangerous materials –  The CDC issued a Cease and Desist to Fort Detrick on 2019July15. The lab put all research on hold on August2 and was shut down on 2019August7 according to reported by Heather Mongilio –  The lab reopened partially in late November 2019 and fully reopened in April 2020. The Link has now been changed, the article has been suppressed.  Link does not work for EU people any more. It worked when it was first posted! 

2019: Summer deletion of Wuhan Institute of Virology Corona Virus data bank. 

2019 October: Glen Beck discovers evidence that 10 hospitals in Wuhan had Covid-19 cases – 

2019: November: University of North Carolina, Moderna and NIH began the sequencing of the 1273 amino acid spike protein vaccine a month before the outbreak officially occurred.

2019 November 12: Black and Vetch sends $369,511  to Labyrinth Global Health in Ukraine for ” Covid-19 Research” before Covid-19 was know or named publicly..

2019: December 31 Wuhan Municipal Health Commission report discussing COVID-19 pneumonia – deleted.

2019: December31: WHO is informed of a pneumonia type outbreak in Wuhan. 

This timeline proves that before every new type of Coronavirus appeared and became a threat to the health of mankind, the nightmare team of Baric, Daszak and Zhengli funded by Fauci’s NIAID and the NIH of Collins and the US government with more than 114 million dollars (see below for the breakdown), had developed the capability to make that new type of Coronavirus themselves. This is true of SARS Cov 1, of MERS and of SARS CoV 2 (Covid-19).

So it seems to the writer that Fauci’s NIAID and the US Government, funded Baric and Daszak to make these bioweapons – possibly for legitimate national security reasons. But when the capability had been developed, then greed set in and a very profitable business model became visible. Furthermore, a global reset political population control model also appeared. These two models were too appealing to too many powerful people. So the decisions were made to release these weapons not long after they were made. There is no question that SARS CoV 2 (causing Covid-19) is man-made, because the virus has a double CGG codon Furin Cleavage site which does not appear in any natural virus. – 

There is no candidate for its creation that is not funded by the NIAID or the NIH or the US government. So this is a US government program. Hence Biden’s instruction to his intelligence services to investigate the origins of Covid-19 resulted in the obvious lie that: WE DON’T KNOW. That one conclusion is in itself proof that the US intelligence services are behind the pandemic. Because they do know that it was man-made. Indeed every reader of the Expose knows that.

The chances of the US intelligence services being unaware of the existence of the Expose in circumstances where every Covid-19 stats department in the 5 eyes countries has responded to their articles by either stopping producing figures, or castigating department heads or changing the way figures are calculated or straight up rigging their figures, are Zero. So they are covering up. So they are guilty. Also the closure of Fort Detrick (the premier US bioweapons facility) due to a leak, in August, 2 months before the October 2019 infections in 10 hospitals in Wuhan, is far too close for comfort. 

When you add to this the fact the Eugenicist Bill Gates and his foundation have been vaccine mad since 1999. You begin to see that this may not have been a legitimate national security endeavour from the start. 

When you consider that Fauci’s NIAID has been funding Baric since 1986, you see that these players are part of a long standing team. 

When you consider how much money they have received from the US government, you see who really is managing this team.

When you consider the number of Biolabs discovered in Ukraine, you see how seriously the US government takes bioweapons research.

When you consider that Moderna had all 7 of its vaccine patents filed 6 months before the outbreak of the disease, and has the double CGG codon cited in 5 of its patent applications dating from 2013, you realise that they are on the inside of this game and a part of the team (through Fauci presumably).

So we know it was man made. We know who funded its creation. We know who created it. We know who profited from it. We know who used it for political control. All that remains is to determine whether those who profited from it and funded it and sought control from it deliberately arranged for its release in order to realise those profits and that control. That is for the reader to decide.

What I will say is that the US-funded Biolabs were not located in Ukraine in order to target Genetic Russians in my opinion. Because first of all, I do not think mankind has that capability yet (thank God). And secondly, the Russians developed their own vaccines denying their market to the nightmare team above. And thirdly even if a virus could be designed that preferentially targeted some aspects of a typical Russian genome, that would constitute a war crime against every nation. Because genetic Russians do not only live in Russia and are not only Russian citizens.

They live all over the globe in large numbers in every country. Such a weapon would be a universal world war, the minute it was released. I think those labs were in Ukraine in order to further the globalist agenda.  Perhaps when they released the next pathogen, they were going to blame it upon Russia, rather than upon China? Or maybe just admit the US did it. Whatever the globalists think will cause the most damage to the system they are trying to destroy or should I say reset, in order to build back better.

Funding for the creation of Covid-19

US Government Funding for Peter Daszak and ECO Health Alliance

US government Funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology

The Wuhan lab got a $3.7 million grant from the US government approved by Obama running over 4 years from 2015 to 2019. – 

Fauci also gave them $3.7 million from the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases)  – In 2019, with the backing of NIAID, the National Institutes of Health committed $3.7 million over six years for research that included some gain-of-function work. The program followed another $3.7 million, 5-year project for collecting and studying bat coronaviruses, which ended in 2019, bringing the total to $7.4 million. – 

“The controversy was such that it led to a Congressional moratorium on chimeric research in the USA. At which point, Dr. Antonio Fauci diverted 3.7 Million U.S. Dollars of U.S. Taxpayer monies to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to continue the research. Rudy Giuliani, legal counsel to U. S. President Donald Trump, and former Mayor of New York city, recently demanded an explanation from Dr. Fauci for this transfer, which violated U.S. Laws against funding the research.

In addition to the research done at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, the specific kind of research into Coronaviruses as possible biological warfare agents, was being done at Fort Detrick, Maryland, USA, by the U. S. Army, which has a Level 3 and 4 Biowarfare Lab at the military base. This lab was cited by the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in July, 2019 for failure to maintain proper containment standards” – 

NIAID and NIGMS Funding of Ralph S. Baric at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

2001 May1: $1,007,735 over 4 years from 2001 to 2004
NIGMS (National Institute of General Medical Sicences)
Reverse Genetics with A Coronavirus Infectious Construct
Baric, Ralph S. 
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

2004 February15: $1.402,316 million over 5 years from 2004 to 2008.
Reverse Genetics
Baric, Ralph S. 
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

Aim 1, we will develop a full length SARS cDNA clone and compare the phenotype of rescued molecular cloned viruses with wildtype using biochemical assays and macaque challenge experiments.
Aim 2, we will develop high titer SARS single hit replicons for use as expression vectors and vaccines.
Aim 3, we will select for SARS host range mutants that replicate in murine (mouse and rat) cells, identify the mechanism of SARS cross species transmission using reverse genetic approaches and evaluate the pathogenicity of these viruses in rodents and non human primates. The goal of this application is to establish genetic control over the SARS genome and provide uniform reagents that will be used by other groups throughout the country.

2004 May15: $367,042 for 2004
Remodeling SARS Coronavirus Genome Regulatory Networks
Baric, Ralph S. 
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

2005 May1: $1,676,513 for 2005
Developing Vaccine Candidates for the SARS Coronavirus
Baric, Ralph S. 
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

Total NIAID funding for Ralph Baric at University of North Carolina was $46,958,414. ( all grants to Baric, Ralph)

2000 201,232
2001 455,041
2002 253,321
2003 902,719
2004 1,628,345
2005 3,277,688
2006 3,262,315
2007 3,315,802
2008 3,539,843
2009 4,273,858
2010 1,877,793
2011 1,703,273
2012 6,871,244
2013 8,985,633
2014 1,404,641
2015 222,637
2016 1,368,161 
2017 3,414,868

Dr David Martin – (not entirely accurate) Richard Flemming (comprehensive). Richard Flemming (comprehensive).  (detailed)

So the US government funded Peter Daszak’s ECO Health Alliance to the tune of 61,491, 183 dollars. It directly or indirectly funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology to the tune of 7.4 million dollars and the NIAID (with a million or so from the NIGMS) funded Ralph Baric to the tune of 46, 958,414 dollars. This totals more than 114 million dollars in the period from 2000 to 2020 to make new Coronaviruses which are infectious to humans.

Q: What kind of a species succeeds in making the common cold more dangerous, but fails to find a cure for it?

Q: What kind of a species makes and enforces a vaccine for a disease which is more lethal than the disease itself?

A: A species whose leadership is genocidal and needs to be removed if we are to survive much longer.


Peter Daszak’s DARPA proposal to…

Search viral genetic databases for new types of ‘furin cleavage sites’ which help a virus attack a host. According to the proposal, ‘high-risk’ versions of these sites, once identified, would then be grafted onto SARS-like bat coronaviruses via genetic engineering.

Is precisely how SARS-CoV-2 was made (essentially the double CGG codon PRRAR Furin Cleavage site was inserted into the RaTG13 Bat Coronavirus). It was man-made, because nature does not have a double CGG codon furin cleavage site in any virus  

The way man made it was to add that cleavage site as Daszak proposed. DARPA rejected his proposal quite rightly (under Trump), because it is a really dangerous thing to do as we have now all discovered. But Daszak had other sources of funding and the proposal became a reality 

This is a lot more evidence and detail for Daszak’s role in the creation of Covid-19 in the website  I do recommend looking at it. It is written by a victim of Covid-19 who has done a massive amount of research. He discloses the Daszak introduced Ralph Baric to Shi Zheng Li and postulates that Daszak orchestrated the whole show.

He reveals that Daszak was a fact-checker at Facebook for a while! He represents that his father was a Nazi death camp executioner in Ukraine during WW2. The author of the site is embittered against Daszak and the site is a Daszak takedown. But the passion he feels has driven him to do a lot of interesting research – which should be seen.

Ironically, the way I proved that Covid-19 was man-made was to do precisely what Peter Daszak wanted DARPA to pay him to do, not for any human targeting Furin Cleavage site but for the particular embodiment of it found in SARS2 (the one that Daszak and the nightmare team eventually settled on I suspect).

When I found that no natural virus had that embodiment at all, I knew that Covid-19 was man-made. Having read the DARPA proposal I believe that man was Peter Daszak, the guy who organised the letter to the Lancet from 27 scientists organised by Peter Daszak who said: 

“We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”

Well, in my book they are none of them are scientists. Because science is about making hypotheses from evidence and formulating theories to be tested by experimentation. It is not about strongly condemning those who follow the scientific method and slandering their efforts using derogatory language.

These 27 are now shown up for what they truly are. I challenge all 27 of them to show me a virus which occurred in nature before 2019 and has a double CGG codon Furin Cleavage site (PRRAR). If they cannot find one then retract their name from that self-condemning letter, and return to being what they were trained to be..

Allow me to explain something to the 27 of Daszak. When two scientists get together and formulate a new scientific theory by discussion, that is a conspiracy theory, a theory arising out of their ‘breathing- together’. If you ban conspiracy theories from science, then any theory which results from any meeting between scientists must be thrown out.

That would abolish most of science. Because even when a scientist by himself formulates a theory as a result of a moment of inspiration, that theory will have had seeds planted through many preceding moments of conspiration. In short, if you condemn conspiracy theories, then you are a 21st-century politician, not a scientist. You may very well be offered a nice lucrative job as a fact checker at Facebook, YouTube or Twitter, however.

It was not until January 9th 2020 that the WHO reported that Chinese authorities had determined the outbreak was due to a novel coronavirus which later became known as SARS-CoV-2 with the alleged resultant disease dubbed COVID-19.

So why was a Coronavirus vaccine created by Moderna transferred to the University of North Carolina on December 12th 2019?

The same Moderna that have had an mRNA coronavirus vaccine authorised for emergency use only in both the United Kingdom and the United States to allegedly combat Covid-19.

What did Moderna, Fauci & Bill Gates know that we didn’t?

In 2019 there was not any singular coronavirus posing a threat to humanity which would warrant a vaccine.

As the world tries to move on there are many questions that remain unanswered, the above being just some of them.

But the discovery of a contract awarded by the U.S. Department of Defense for Covid-19 research in November 2019, and the fact Moderna and Fauci’s NIAID has an mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidate funded by Bill Gates ready in December 2019, suggests that the permanent U.S Government, Dr Anthony Fauci, Mr Bill Gates & Moderna all know the answers to those questions.

Share this page to Telegram
4 3 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
8 months ago

So conflicting, Dr Vernon Coleman says that covid was rebranded flu, not bioweapons.

Reply to  Martin
8 months ago

Please refer to Dr David Martin – he explains why, in US Statute, viruses subject to certain genetic engineering processes are legally defined as bioweapons and therefore subject to higher levels of scrutiny and regulation – and sanction for non compliance?

FFIW, Daszak writing to the UK press yesterday, when he has largely invisible, to postulate about what is or is not GoF processes, is perhaps an indication of the panic running through all the SARS COV2 “bad actors” – his prior public appearance was to organise and seek publication via the Lancet of the letter denying the lab leak which was signed by the gang of 27…now seen as a sysops deflection exercise which appears to have failed spectacularly?

Reply to  Martin
8 months ago

Most of “science” is propaganda now, most “scientists” and “experts” are paid mouth pieces for Bill Gates. Gates is to science what a fart is to a submarine!

Reply to  Truthbknown
8 months ago

All “science” is bought and paid for by the owners of the system.

Reply to  Martin
8 months ago

The bioweapon is the vaccine.

Jamie cronus
Jamie cronus
8 months ago

Why do the expose and others insist on pushing this obviously bogus story of gain of function?
It places your legitimacy in question. The annual flu data can be traced back to the 1980’s, peak then trough peak then trough.
But then as if by magic “poof!” in 2020 this solid chain of data is broken as annual influenza disappeared. No.
Covid 19 is flu albeit with the assistance of a misused pcr test and a global PR team.
Think. C’mon man you can do so much better expose!

Eduardo Nunez
Eduardo Nunez
Reply to  Jamie cronus
8 months ago

No, Jamie. Influenza viruses do not contain spike proteins. Only Coronaviruses do. Spike proteins are irritants to all and toxins to many.. Influenza viruses do not cause the clotting abnormalities and thromboses as does the SARS CoV-2 . Influenza doesn’t cause anywhere near the number of Adult Resp distress syndrome w Respiratory failure cases as can SARS CoV-2. Influenza viruses fall under the Orthomyxovirus category, whereas Coronavirus are Orthocoronaviruses. The only thing they have in common is that they are RNA viruses(like most viruses are-Influena, Coronavirses, Rhinoviruses, Rabies, Hepatitis A&C and HIV(Although HIV is easily reverse-transcribed into a DNA virus before it can enter the nucleus of the white cell it is invading-hence the term “retrovirus” for it’s family) as opposed to pure DNA viruses (Herpes, Adeno, Pox, Papova, Parvo, Hepatitis B etc.

Reply to  Eduardo Nunez
8 months ago

“Im no scientist” but when you listen to such as Dr Shankara Chetty describe how infected patients exhibited a serious allergic reaction post infection causing oedema in the lungs, indicative of kidney dysfunction, I don’t know that influenza has ever caused a similar reaction?

Reply to  Eduardo Nunez
8 months ago

The vaccines cause the clotting – not any virus

Reply to  Eduardo Nunez
8 months ago

No Eduardo, all viruses are fictitious. No virus has ever been isolated. They’re all theoretical products of fake science.

Reply to  Jamie cronus
8 months ago

With respect, I do not think annual influenza disappeared – authorities such as the NHS in the UK were forced into testing using a scientifically flawed and fraudulent PCR based test regime which when a “positive result” was “confirmed” was recorded as “CV19” – let’s not forget that anecdotally an orange tested “positive”.

SARS COV2 is emphatically non naturally occurring, non zoonotic, GoF modified by virtue of the FCS which makes “it” pathogenic to humans whereas zoonotic CVs are not.

Jimmy Jukebox
Jimmy Jukebox
8 months ago

When you Understand The Lies and Fraud of HIV AIDS,
Then You WILL UNDERSTAND The Lies and Fraud of COVID-19.
Robert Willner Explains HIV AIDS Lies and Fraud The BEST.


8 months ago

An investment of 6.5 million shares in Moderna by a company called Theleme back in 2014-15, had given a fantastic return on investment while the covid scam was in full swing.
As a sitting director of Theleme, will Rishi Sunak now sell those shares with this news gaining traction?

8 months ago

More rehashed scientifically illiterate guff.

FACT: There is no question that SARS-CoV 2 has never been properly isolated and proven to exist.

FACT: Viral “genomes” are constructed on computers using unscientific and fraudulent methods and do not exist in their entirety in the real world.

FACT: SARS-CoV-2 has never been proven to be replication competent or cause any disease.

FACT: EM pictures claiming to show SARS-CoV-2 have never been proven to be anything other than extracellular vesicles produced in response to cellular damage. They are protective not harmful.

All of the above has been proven “beyond a reasonable doubt” and incontrovertible evidence of all of these facts exists. The Expose has chosen not to report on it anymore (they used to) for some reason.

U.S. D.O.D. issued contracts prove nothing. Research grant awards and patents also prove nothing. These are paper trails left for people to find when the limited hangout position has to be adopted (now seems to be that time). 

Of course they had advanced knowledge of the scam they were about to unleash on the world but this does not mean “the U.S Government either knew the virus existed naturally or was involved in constructing it in a lab.” A third option (the truth) is that the virus exists only on a computer which is where it was constructed to be used as a psy-op in conjunction with fraudulent tests like the PCR.

“Bill Gates is not a Scientist or a Doctor.”

People who write for The Expose are not Scientists or Doctors either (including the “concerned reader”). Dr Stefan Lanka is a scientist, Dr Sam Bailey, and Dr Mark Bailey are doctors. I am a scientist. These are just a few examples of well qualified people who The Expose never seem to report on for some reason.

The fact that virologists have failed to induce cytopathic effects in human lung epithelial cells and so prefer to use African green monkey kidney cells instead (which are very sensitive to damage by the antimicrobial compounds added to cell cultures) invalidates the claim that coronaviruses were engineered to be “pathogenic to mankind targeting lung epithelial cells”.

No “coronavirus” has ever been shown to be replication competent so it isnt necessary to engineer a “replication defective coronavirus.” 

What evidence is there for the “mysterious” or “atypical” pneumonia? None at all. 

“A new form of a coronavirus never before seen in humans is confirmed as the cause of SARS according to Koch’s postulates, which are four specific conditions that must be met for a pathogen to be confirmed as a causal agent of disease.”

That is a complete lie and i challenge the author of that lie to post the scientific paper upon which the lie is based. “Fact checkers” have also published similar lies which can easily be refuted.

“Let’s look at the big picture: A novel SARS coronavirus emerges in Wuhan with a novel cleavage site in it.”

The big picture is that a genetic sequence was created on a CCP computer in Wuhan with the novel cleavage site included. There is no evidence of a real pandemic at all or that “the decisions were made to release these weapons not long after they were made.”

The scientifically illiterate and patronising “concerned reader” presumes that:

“They do know that it was man-made. Indeed every reader of the Expose knows that.”

Really? Seems to me that many readers of The Expose don’t believe in this pseudoscientific guff. See the comments for further details.

Yes they are “covering up” and yes “they are guilty” but what they are covering up and are guilty of is inventing an imaginary virus on a computer to terrify the world into compliance with. 

“All that remains is to determine whether those who profited from it and funded it and sought control from it deliberately arranged for its release in order to realise those profits and that control. That is for the reader to decide.”

Many readers have already decided that this story is a limited hangout to hide the real truth that the whole thing has been a psy-op.

The “concerned reader” claims to have “proved that Covid-19 was man-made” because he fails to understand the difference between a genetic sequence uploaded to the internet and an actual physical infectious particle.

The scientifically illiterate “concerned reader” who does not understand the scientific method, nor does he understand that the pseudoscience of virology doesnt follow the scientific method patronises the readers even more with this: 

“science is about making hypotheses from evidence and formulating theories to be tested by experimentation. It is not about strongly condemning those who follow the scientific method and slandering their efforts using derogatory language.”


Reply to  Sam
8 months ago

Can’t prove or disprove what you say because I am only a “concerned citizen”. I do know that the shots patented before the “virus” was released are killing and maiming people because they are bio-weapons containing spike proteins that program every cell in the body to manufacture more spike protein. I know that the nano-particles contain harmful materials that affect immunity and can cause heart issues, blood issues, and neurological issues as well as organ and reproductive damage.

Reply to  Glen
8 months ago

Yes the shots are lethal bio/nano weapons but there was no virus and no pandemic. That was the ruse to convince people to take the shots. If people dont understand the nature of the scam they will repeat it.

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  Sam
8 months ago

Hi Sam,
I am a simpleton and like to keep things simple.
In 1916 there was the Spanish flu, which killed millions of people.
The Mormons and Amish refused to have the vaccinations against the flu. Most survived, many helped in the Hospitals.
The same families that were involved in the Spanish Flu jabs, were again involved in the C19 jabs.
Even the same slogans were used.
History repeated itself, and our Politicians were again involved in the chemical manufacturing and profiting of the C19 fluid.
These Politicians must have their day in court. Or they will never accept their part in the scam.

Reply to  Dave Owen
8 months ago

Unfortunately the courts are also part of the corrupt system. Everything is owned by the same bastards who committed these crimes against humanity.

8 months ago

The U.S. Department of Defense through DARPA is ultimately responsible.

Reply to  Glen
8 months ago

They’re just another tool of the owners.

Reply to  Charles
8 months ago

It’s a big club and we ain’t in it!

8 months ago

They left one part out: The virus was RELEASED ON PURPOSE to wreck the global economy and steal an election!

Reply to  Truthbknown
8 months ago

No virus was released. They don’t exist. Kapisch?

8 months ago

VIRUSES ARE NOT CONTAGIOUS- this is essential to understand- “ covid “ is just the rebranding of colds/ flus which are the fetid cycle of the human body – there is no infectious virus – it’s a lie – VIRUSES EXPLAINED Stop spreading the mainstream propaganda

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  Mooners53
8 months ago

Andrew Bridgen MP UK Parliament 17 March 2023This article in Tapnewswire, shows how our Politicians played with our lives and our children’s lives.
To say the UK MP’s are well paid, there were only about 8 in the whole debate.
Treason can be the job for our Military to have trials for.
Sooner the better.

Reply to  Dave Owen
8 months ago

Don’t hold your breath.

8 months ago

The perfect scam.
CO2 & all viruses are;
– Invisible, colorless, & odorless, so the average person can’t even verify anything about them.
– Both have adherents that love computer models, not actual scientific proof. Climate models have hundreds or thousands of inputs yet they don’t even include the sun as an input. Its completely ignored, as if it doesn’t exist. The sun is a million times the size of earth, 93,000,000 miles from earth, yet responsible for all life on earth.
– Covid/Climate crank Neil Ferguson is a perfect example. Upon the release of the current scam pathogen, he set about playing with his models to predict an apocalyptic holocaust if the world didn’t heed his dire warnings and immediately lockdown the whole economy.

The Climate Change Scam & COVID Virus Scam.

The History Of The Modern “Climate Change” Scam

Reply to  OverLord
8 months ago

Most people are inclined to be afraid and believe in the invisible, but when they see the chemtrails in the sky right above them with their own eyes, they pay no mind to it. It seems natural to them to be sprayed like cockroaches.

8 months ago

[…] They created “covid-19” to subdue entire populations and trigger these agendas. […]

8 months ago

I think covid being made in a lab is gas-lighting. I mean if covid is no more dangerous than the flu, then why bother?

Consider three things:
1) Respiratory viruses do not kill their host cell. The human immune system kills infected cells. So respiratory viruses have nothing in them that actually kills human cells. So how can a lab make a virus more dangerous?

2) Respiratory viruses are not contagious. During the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, experiments showed that phelgm and mucus when stuck up the noses of healthy sailors did not make them sick.

3) Terrain theory. Flu (covid) is really caused by your body being run down, not some virus. This could be over-work, a bad diet, drugs, air pollution etc.

Saying covid was made in a lab, scares people. So you really should avoid saying these things. If people are scared, they will go along with the agenda.

Maybe some people in a lab did make a new bit of DNA or RNA. Maybe they put it in some kind of lipid coat. But really I don’t think these new creation would spread much or cause much new illness.

But the main point is that COVID vaccines don’t work and cause much harm.

There are articles out now saying covid vaccines have 35% DNA contamination. This is going to cause harm to the human gene pool. The problems this is going to cause cannot be under-estimated. People are seeing the future. Unvaccinated dating is needed to save the gene pool.

8 months ago

The COVID lab leak theory is not a logical, reasonable or sensible theory. There was no excess death anywhere in the world until “lockdowns”. From the Diamond Princess cruise ship to Iran to Italy to the US to Europe or anywhere else, everywhere had normal death totals until lockdowns. It was ventilators, drugs, fear and the refusal to treat sick old people (and now the vax), that caused excess deaths after, and only after, lockdowns. Are you suggesting this virus leaked, or was released, and then waited until lockdowns to attack? And even after the medical industry began unwittingly culling the herd, there was no excess death in people under 25 in the US throughout the “pandemic”. No excess death in young people in Europe. Japan had less death in 2020 than 2019. No excess death in China, Australia or New Zealand until the “vaccine” roll out. Most of Africa had no excess death. Scotland reports no COVID deaths in working age police, doctors, nurses, teachers or shop workers. In the US all cause mortality jumped to 2004 levels. 2004. There was no lab leak in 2004 was there?  What incredible function this virus has gained. It causes the exact same symptoms as the flu, while replacing the flu, patiently waiting until lockdowns to strike like lightning, politely ignoring young people, the Japanese, all famous people, Africa, Scottish doctors, nurses, teachers, cops and grocery store employees, but wreaking havoc on the rest of humanity the likes of which we haven’t seen since the great plague of 2004. Maybe it gets it’s magic abilities from the double CGG codon Furin Cleavage site, or the HIV inserts. Stop pushing this nonsense. It is a red herring. Everyone talking about man made SARS-COV-2 is looking at a genome on a computer screen. That genome IS man made. On a computer, not in a lab. It exists only in silico. The lab leak story is “false narrative B”. “False narrative A” is “there’s a deadly virus on the loose, put a couple masks on and hide in your basement until we get a vaccine”. It is meant for the masses; the Official Theorists. The 75% who are so incurious they will believe every official narrative unquestioningly. But the system, or the deep state or the oligarchs or the illuminati or whatever you call the military/intelligence/mafia/priest class that runs the world, they are going to have additional narratives that attempt to capture and distract the 25% that still retain some semblance of consciousness. Q-anon, snake venom, lab leak. Narrative B is for the rest of us. It is just as fake as narrative A, mixed with more intrigue. There is no new virus in the data. If there was a new virus it would show up statistically, but it doesn’t. There are no unique symptoms nor any accurate test so it only exists anecdotally. “I had a weird thing”, “I know a guy who died from it”, “it was so bad my cousin was put on a vent”. People get and die from “weird” things everyday. This is not new. It’s the advertising of “weird” things that’s new. There is no evidence this virus exists outside of a computer. Yes, mad scientists are cooking up lots of dangerous stuff in labs all over the world, but this “lab leak” story is a scripted narrative, based on real research and real contracts and real people and maybe, though I doubt it, real viruses, but it is a script based on those things not an event caused by those things. It is the only theory that reasonably explains all available data. So, to all lab leak theorists, please answer these questions for me if you would be so kind (you’ve been working on this theory for three plus years so this should be easy).
1) Was it leaked (accident) or released (on purpose).
2) Who leaked/released it. Names please.
3) If it isn’t a global psy op (involving “elites” from all over the world), but a nefarious act of one or a few, why haven’t any of the individuals involved (Fauci, Daszak, Wuhan lab techs or whomever) been prosecuted?
4) From where, exactly, was it leaked/released?
5) When, date specific, was it leaked/released?
6) How was it leaked/released. Details, please. Did a hose carrying aerosolized COVID break free in the Wuhan lab? Maybe a couple lab employees were infected and tasked with sneezing their way into a pandemic. Was liquid COVID dumped into the water supply by Tony Fauci? Did Peter Dasak rent a crop duster and just start spraying the crap out of us? It’s been over three years and I’ve yet to hear even an attempt at defining what “lab leak” means.
7) If it was released on purpose, as in a bio attack, how were the people releasing it going to avoid it? Wasn’t it dangerous to them and their loved ones?
8) How do you explain the global death data data? No excess death before lockdowns, no excess death in young people, no excess death in many countries, etc.
9) How do you explain the Wuhan lockdown? What were the “authorities” in Wuhan reacting to? According to the data, this is a disease a little less deadly than the flu for young healthy people and slightly more deadly than the flu for old, sick people, and it is without unique symptoms. Wuhan is a city of over twelve million people. It is so polluted there were street protests throughout the summer of 2019 demanding the government do something about all the pollution. They have a lot of pneumonia already, how did they notice a new flu that replaced old flu during regular flu season? Were the hospitals scrambling to figure out why they were treating 17 cases of pneumonia in 78 year old patients with four comorbidities instead of the usual 14 cases of pneumonia in 78 year old patients with four comorbidities? We had the same disease right? Did it occur to you that we should totally weld people into their apartments to “stop the spread”? I think Wuhan was scene one of “COVID-19, The Movie”, a scripted event carried out by the movie’s producers, but what do you think they were reacting to in Wuhan?
10) Speaking of Wuhan; you believe US funds went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and that US entities collaborated with the Chinese on virus research, yes? Do you think it reasonable US intelligence would allow this without having human and signals intelligence in and around the lab? Did the US hand over money and research and then say “Well friends, we’re gonna head on home. Good luck making pathogens or medicines or whatever and don’t forget to close the fridge tight so a deadly virus doesn’t escape. Please don’t hesitate to call us if you need anything!” Don’t you think western intelligence would have been all over China’s first biosafety level 4 laboratory, especially since western nations were funding it? And if so, and this isn’t a scripted psy op, shouldn’t we have known exactly what was happening in Wuhan by Christmas 2019?
11) What’s your opinion of Event 201, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation sponsored tabletop exercise that simulated an outbreak of a more transmissible, novel, SARS like coronavirus that jumps from bats to people causing a global pandemic a month before an outbreak of a more transmissible, novel, SARS like coronavirus that jumps from bats to people and causes a global pandemic. Do you think these folks were psychic? Were these people involved in the “lab leak” or responding to it?  Brad Connett was there. And George Gao. But I think the most interesting attendee was Avril Haines. At the time she was a Senior Research Scholar at Columbia University; a Senior Fellow at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory; a member of the National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service; and a principal at WestExec Advisors. Now she is the Director of National Intelligence, the head of the United States Intelligence Community. I think Event 201 was the table read for “COVID-19, The Movie”. It was the script global intelligence networks were going to follow when “COVID-19, The Movie” started filming a couple months later.
The “lab leak” theory is a deep state distraction. If a virus leaked from a lab they can justify the masks and the vaccines and the quarantines and every other disgusting immoral, unethical, illegal behavior of the state during COVID. They will get away with it. Imagine the awakening if the TV announced “Breaking news: It turns out, after a thorough and exhaustive investigation, there never was a virus.” Now that might cause the system some real trouble.

Reply to  Bill
8 months ago


7 months ago

[…] The COVID Virus was made in a BioLab & Fauci, Bill Gates & Moderna are all responsible […]

6 months ago

[…] remain ensnared in the Covid lie evidenced by silence about SARS Coronavirus research and the evidence of patented genetic gain of function technology, some owned by the Department of Defense. The DOD was the behind-the-scenes actual authority behind […]

6 months ago

[…] remain ensnared in the Covid lie evidenced by silence about SARS Coronavirus research and the evidence of patented genetic gain of function technology, some owned by the Department of Defense. The DOD was the behind-the-scenes actual […]

6 months ago

[…] remain ensnared in the Covid lie evidenced by silence about SARS Coronavirus research and the evidence of patented genetic gain of function technology, some owned by the Department of Defense. The DOD was the behind-the-scenes actual […]