Breaking News

Pharma-funded Australian drug regulator grants full approval to Pfizer for its harmful covid injection

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On 13 July, Australia’s drug regulator quietly granted full approval for Pfizer’s Comirnaty “vaccine.” This is the same product that currently has 81,361 reported adverse events, with 443 deaths.

Why would the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (“TGA”) give full approval to a drug that has a bad safety profile?  Is it because the TGA receives nearly all its funding from the companies that it is supposed to regulate?


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Full registration granted for Pfizer Covid vaccine, Australia

By Rebekah Barnett

Australia’s drug regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (“TGA”), has quietly granted full registration to the Pfizer Comirnaty covid vaccine.

There was no media release, and the page associated with the product has not been updated since September 2022.

However, the TGA’s website page titled ‘Covid-19 vaccines regulatory status’, last updated on 27 July 2023, clearly states that full registration was granted on 13 July 2023.

This is the same product that currently has 81, 361 reported adverse events in DAEN (Australia’s VAERS or Yellow Card database). 443 of these entries are reported deaths, one of whom is Amy Sedgewick, who died at 23 years old after suffering a “catastrophic reaction” to her Pfizer vaccinations.

It should surprise no one that the Pfizer Comirnaty product has received full registration, despite: high rates of infection, hospitalisations and excess deaths after the vaccine rollout; independent peer-reviewed analysis of Pfizer’s own trial data determining the product to have one of the most appalling safety profiles of any drug in pharmaceutical history; and pharmacovigilance data indicating the same.

After all, an investigation by Australian science journalist Maryanne Demasi for the British Medical Journal found that the TGA receives more industry funding than any other regulator in the world, at 96%. More than nine out of every ten applications for new drugs are approved by the regulator.

Source: Table 1 How the regulators compare, From FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire? By Maryanne Demasi and published in the British Medical Journal on  29 June 2022

From the investigation:

Sociologist Donald Light of Rowan University in New Jersey, US, who has spent decades studying drug regulation, says, “Like the FDA, the TGA was founded to be an independent institute. However, being largely funded by fees from the companies whose products it is charged to evaluate is a fundamental conflict of interest and a prime example of institutional corruption.”

From FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire? By Maryanne Demasi and published in the British Medical Journal on  29 June 2022

Or, in Senator Alex Antic’s words, in a Senate Committee Hearing last week, “The TGA is not going to bite the hand that feeds it.”

Representatives from the TGA insisted that receiving most of their funding from industry presents no conflict of interest. They also disputed the figure of 96% of funding coming from the TGA.

At the same hearing, for the Committee’s review of a bill proposing to abolish workplace discrimination on the basis of covid vaccination status, two Pfizer representatives repeated, “safe and effective, benefits outweigh the risks” like bots churning out pro-forma answers to questions that were not in their FAQ database.

During the hearing, Drs. Krishan Thiru (Country Medical Director, Pfizer Australia), and Brian Hewitt (Head of Regulatory Sciences, Pfizer Australia):

  • Told the Committee that Australians subjected to coercive vaccine mandates were not forced to take their product. Rather, they were offered an “opportunity.” An opportunity to lose their income, be locked out of gyms, cafes, concert venues, community clubs, visiting aged care and hospitals, and in my home state, to be banned from purchasing alcohol – even via drive-thru.
  • Refused to say under oath that the Comirnaty product stops or limits transmission, but also refused to walk back CEO Albert Bourla’s statements that it does.
  • Could not explain how their product causes myocarditis and pericarditis.
  • Refused to disclose details of Pfizer’s indemnity agreement with the Australian Government, for which the Government has allocated an “unquantifiable” amount in 2023-24 Federal Budget papers.
  • Confirmed that Pfizer Australia imported reserved lots of their vaccine for their own employees. (Note: This was first revealed by Jikkyleaks, late last year. Earlier this year, a spokesperson from the TGA told DDU that the reason the Pfizer employees got separate reserved batches was to use up a small number of residual vials that, due to their small number, were not able to be supplied to the Australian Government public vaccination program. The product was purported to be identical to other batches used in the public program, and was tested by the European Authority.)
  • Told the Committee that, “Pfizer always abides by all of the laws and regulations in the markets within which it operates,” a stunning statement in light of the company’s long history of criminal fines and alleged fraud.

The performance of the Pfizer representatives provides assurance of the company’s commitment to obfuscation, semantic games, and profits at the expense of human rights and medical ethics. Watch the hearing in full HERE.

As it stands, both Moderna and Pfizer’s primary series covid vaccine products have now been granted full registration by the TGA. This bodes well for the private-public partnerships in mRNA research projects and manufacturing facilities rolling out around Australia.

Post note:

A final word from the internet’s most scientifically qualified mouse:

About the author

Rebekah Barnett is an Australian independent journalist.  You can follow and support Barnett’s journalism on her Substack page ‘Dystopian Down UnderHERE.  She is also a volunteer interviewer for ‘Jab Injuries Australia’,  a website that collects stories of people who claim to have been injured by Covid vaccines.

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Islander
Islander
1 month ago

Pharma-funded, says it all!

Sidney DSouza
Sidney DSouza
1 month ago

Tedros the W H.O. director declared the end of the Covid-19 Pandemic on 05 May 2023. Why has the TGA given approval after the WHO declared end of the pandemic?

mgofhg
mgofhg
1 month ago

13th July?!? Why has it taken nearl a month for this to come out?

christine.257
christine.257
1 month ago

How the US weaponised the war on Covid (As did the countries we live in, not USA)
By
Paula Jardine
August 7, 2023

ON June 17 Sasha Latypova, a retired pharmaceutical industry executive, gave an interview to Jan Jekielek, a senior editor of the Epoch Times, about the military machinery behind the global Covid-19 response. Latypova told him: ‘So right from the start there was a huge deception going on. They’re treating it as war and they’re telling people it’s a health event. They’re covering up military activity with this representation of health event and a response to a health threat.’

The ‘they’ Latypova is referring to is not China, which is currently under the spotlight due to the controversy over the origins of SARS-CoV2, a laboratory engineered virus. It is the American government to which Latypova has turned her attention after she reviewed redacted copies of the Operation Warp Speed contracts which were obtained through Freedom of Information requests.

‘They’re utilizing the structure of ordering countermeasures, ordering prototypes, with the Department of Defense ordering them from the pharmaceutical manufacturers under Defense Production Act, and under Other Transaction Authority,’ said Latypova. ‘Good manufacturing practices are not part of it at all.’

The US Department of Defense (DoD) dictionary defines a countermeasure as a ‘form of military science that, by the employment of devices and/or techniques, has as its objective the impairment of the operational effectiveness of enemy activity.’ Medical countermeasures (MCM) are ‘FDA-regulated products (biologics, drugs, devices) that may be used in the event of a potential public health emergency.’ This concept of countermeasure development for use in civilian populations in public health emergencies is a legacy of the administration of President George W Bush. The War on Microbes is a sub-genre of Bush’s War on Terror.

The US military defines a biological agent as a ‘micro-organism (or toxin derived from it) that causes disease’. Vaccines are regulated by the FDA as biological products, therefore they can be described as biological agents. The mRNA products instruct recipients’ cells to make a form of its spike protein, the most antigenic and, some researchers argue, toxic part of a coronavirus.

Since December 2020, 5.5billion people, 72 per cent of the global population, have been injected with Covid-19 vaccines commissioned under Operation Warp Speed by the US Army as countermeasure prototypes. Evidence is mounting that these OWS vaccines are ineffective at countering the virus while evidence simultaneously mounts linking them to increases in the incidence rates of cancer and cardiac diseases. The novel technologies used were hastily fast-tracked into human trials while Operation Warp Speed received material assistance from the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) who recklessly authorised them. By the US military’s own definition, the objective of a countermeasure is ‘the impairment of the operational effectiveness of enemy activity’. The injection of these countermeasure prototype vaccines which satisfy the US military definition of a biological agent into people has killed some recipients and permanently disabled increasingly large numbers of others, resulting in their ‘operational effectiveness’ as human beings being impaired. Even if it was not its intention, based on the measurable effects of their deployment, by the US military’s own definitions of terms used in OWS contracts, the products it commissioned amount to bioweapons.
TCW
Me: However, vaccines don’t work and never have – there has been no test done against a salt water placebo to see if vaccines do anything at all, apart from causing injuries and death – injecting vaccines is a lot to stake your life on, based on, an “assumption”. Hang on though, that was your vaccinated life we are talking about, not “theirs” – that right?

READ THIS: https://www.keionline.org/misc-docs/DOD-ATI-Pfizer-Technical-Direction-Letter-OTA-W15QKN-16-9-1002-21July2020.pdf

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Pharma-funded Australian drug regulator grants full approval to Pfizer for its harmful covid in… […]

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

They just want the money And they know they and therir kids will get the special batch or exemptions from the doc anyway IMO

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read More: Pharma-funded Australian drug regulator grants full approval to Pfizer for its harmful c… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read More: Pharma-funded Australian drug regulator grants full approval to Pfizer for its harmful c… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Pharma-funded Australian drug regulator grants full approval to Pfizer for its harmful covid injecti… On 13 July, Australia’s drug regulator quietly granted full approval for Pfizer’s Comirnaty “vaccine.” This is the same product that currently has 81,361 reported adverse events, with 443 deaths. Why would the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (“TGA”) give full approval to a drug that has a bad safety profile?  Is it because the TGA receives nearly all its funding from the companies that it is supposed to regulate? […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Pharma-funded Australian drug regulator grants full approval to Pfizer for its harmful covid injecti…On 13 July, Australia’s drug regulator quietly granted full approval for Pfizer’s Comirnaty “vaccine.” This is the same product that currently has 81,361 reported adverse events, with 443 deaths. Why would the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (“TGA”) give full approval to a drug that has a bad safety profile?  Is it because the TGA receives nearly all its funding from the companies that it is supposed to regulate? […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Pharma-funded Australian drug regulator grants full approval to Pfizer for its harmful covid injection. LINK […]

Blisskitt
Blisskitt
1 month ago

That link does not show as you say Covid-19 vaccines regulatory status’, last updated on 27 July 2023, clearly states that full registration was granted on 13 July 2023, at all. I searched the entire website and could find no reference to full approval. Updated yes on that date but still all shows provisional.