Breaking News

Mortality Rates per 100k prove Quadruple Vaccinated Adults are 104% more likely to die than Unvaccinated Adults

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

An analysis of data contained in a report quietly published by the UK Government department known as the Office for National Statistics has shockingly revealed that four-dose vaccinated adults aged between 40 and 49 are up to 104% more likely to die than unvaccinated adults based on mortality rates per 100,000 population.

Meanwhile, one-dose vaccinated adults aged between 40 and 49 are up to 185% more likely to die than unvaccinated adults of the same age.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


The ONS dataset, available on the ONS website here, details deaths by vaccination status from April 1, 2021, to May 31, 2023. Our analysis focused on mortality rates per 100,000 person-years from January to May 2023 among residents in England aged 40 to 49, and what we found is truly shocking.

Click to enlarge
Source Data

The figures reveal that both one-dose and four-dose vaccinated adults aged 40-49 were significantly more likely to die than unvaccinated adults of the same age in every single month since the beginning of 2023.

January was the worst month for both vaccinated groups as a mortality rate per 100,000 of 411.3 was recorded among the one-dose vaccinated and a mortality rate of 258.5 per 100,000 was recorded among the four-dose vaccinated.

Whereas a mortality rate of just 144.5 per 100,000 was recorded among the unvaccinated.

Click to enlarge
Source Data

The graph above shows more clearly how the four-dose and one-dose vaccinated dramatically surpassed unvaccinated 40-49-year-olds in terms of mortality rates per 100,000.

And it shows that the January to May average mortality rates were 132.08 per 100,000 among the unvaccinated, 264.14 per 100,000 among the one0-dose vaccinated and 225.2 per 100,000 among the four-dose vaccinated. Meaning, on average, the one-dose vaccinated were 100% more likely to die than the unvaccinated, and the four-dose vaccinated were 71% more likely to die.

Click to enlarge
Source Data

However, a month-by-month analysis shows that in March, the four-dose vaccinated were 104% more likely to die than unvaccinated 40-49-year-olds based on mortality rates per 100,000.

Click to enlarge
Source Data

While in January, the one-dose vaccinated were 185% more likely to die than unvaccinated 40-49-year-olds.

Because these figures are mortality rate per 100,000 it cannot be argued that this is because more people have had the Covid-19 vaccine. This means the figures are extremely worrying, especially when we consider the fact they also include Covid-19 deaths.

It appears the UK Government has quietly revealed that the Covid-19 injections are deadly and killing adults in the thousands.

Share this page to Telegram
3 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kevin
Kevin
1 month ago
UltraZero
UltraZero
1 month ago
trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read More: Mortality Rates per 100k prove Quadruple Vaccinated Adults are 104% more likely to die t… […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read More: Mortality Rates per 100k prove Quadruple Vaccinated Adults are 104% more likely to die t… […]

M. G.
M. G.
1 month ago

Why are they always U.K. charts?

mitsigan
mitsigan
Reply to  M. G.
19 days ago

because the expose is uk based

LookingUp
LookingUp
1 month ago

This makes no sense. If the mortality rate for those with one shot is 185% higher than the non-shot, how can the rate be lower (104%) for those with four?

KarlM Alias
KarlM Alias
Reply to  LookingUp
1 month ago

Many of the serious conditions brought on by the genetic shots take time to kill. For example, pulmonary arterial hypertension (blocking of lung capillaries) and myocarditis take on average 5 years, but can be much longer. There are also much fewer who took the 4th shot, either because they were already dead, or else figured out (correctly) that these things can maim and kill in more ways than there are stars in the sky.

mitsigan
mitsigan
Reply to  LookingUp
19 days ago

because the ones who stopped taking shots are the ones who were seriously injured by their first shot, and their injury increased their chances of dying

Dominique
Dominique
1 month ago

This ONS data is DELIBERATELY understating the vaccinated death rates. YOU MUST SUMMATE ALL OF THE VACCINATED DEATHS (regardless of dose and you will see that the death rates for vaccinated vs unvaccinated are over 400% higher.

Manuel
Manuel
1 month ago

Of course this is correct, but it is using the same RELATIVE MORTALITY statistic just like PFIZER used with it’s 95% effectiveness Scam. Lets not use the Sheeple Fooling techniques the Enemy uses. Lets be honest.

Relative data should be put in perspective cmparing it with ABSOLUTE MORTALITY DATA. Pfizer did not do the comparison to ABSOLUTE EFFECTIVENESS in order to hide it and to make the 95% Effectiveness Title convincing to the Sheeple.

What does the ABSOLUTE CONCEPT mean? It measures the benefited (effectiveness) the or damaged (toxicity, or mortality) to the WHOLE number of studied people. It compares those affected to the TOTAL POPULATION… In Pfizer’s case the Absolute Effectiveness was 0.85% which meant that less than 1% of the total people studied benefited from their vaccine… To see if the vaccine give an overall benefit one has to compare the Absolute Efficiency to the Absolute Mortality and/or Absolute Toxicity of the Vaccine. If the benefited is more than the damage the Vaccine would be ok, but if the damaged is more than the benefited then the Vaccine is NOT OK.

Conveniently Pfizer, the Government and Mainstream Media steer away from the Absolute Numbers

In this case lets not tangle the numbers and give the ABSOLUTE TOXICITY BY COMPARING THE VACCINATED’S TOXICITY TO THE VACCINATED NUMBER.

I estimate that the Absolute Toxicity will be much larger than the Absolute Benefit of 0,85% (even if there is no certainty that the Pfizer number was not chated in the trials since conflict of interest existed)