Breaking News

Conservatives are banned from entering the UK, while extremists are welcomed

Please share our story!


Eva Vlaardingerbroek, a Dutch conservative commentator and activist who has been outspoken about mass migration, is banned from entering Britain because the state considers that her presence in the UK is not “conducive to the public good.”

It wasn’t that long ago that a certain Keir Starmer was urging the British people to elect as prime minister a man who described the Islamist terrorists Hamas and Hezbollah as “friends.”

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Two-Tier Britain: Banning Conservatives, Welcoming Extremists

By Matt Goodwin

Here is a story you might have missed and one that tells us a great deal about how utterly absurd Britain has become.

Eva Vlaardingerbroek – a 29-year-old Dutch lawyer, commentator and conservative influencer – has just been banned from entering Britain.  Her electronic travel authorisation revoked. No due process. No clear explanation. Just a curt line from the Home Office:  “Your presence in the UK is not considered conducive to the public good.”

Let that sink in.

A peaceful citizen. No criminal record. No charges. No convictions.

Her crime?

Holding and expressing conservative views that challenge the prevailing liberal consensus among Western elites.

Just look at the glaring double standard that is on display here and then try to tell me we do not live in a two-tier regime.

The very same British state that has rushed to ban a conservative influencer refuses to ban the Muslim Brotherhood, refuses to proscribe the Iranian Revolutionary Guards and refuses to stop countless, unvetted ISIS sympathisers, extremists, terrorists and other criminals from entering the country illegally on the small boats.

Britain now operates some of the weakest borders in the developed world. We tolerate illegal entry on an industrial scale. We allow foreign extremists to exploit asylum systems designed for genuine refugees.

We turn a blind eye to radical networks, criminal gangs, Islamists and others in our prisons and on our streets because confronting them would be “politically difficult.”

But a conservative influencer with a large following? A woman who dares to speak about mass migrationcrime and national decline? She’s a threat to society.

Utterly ridiculous.

This is the very definition of a two-tier regime – one rule for those who challenge the failing consensus among Western elites, such as Keir Starmer, and another rule for everybody else who backs them.

Eva herself put it plainly: “I’ve been banned from travelling to the UK. They revoked my ETA. My presence is not considered conducive to the public good.”

Not conducive to the public good? For what? Speaking at conservative conferences? Criticising Keir Starmer in her videos? Speaking at a Tommy Robinson rally in London? Opposing mass immigration? Calling for remigration? Being friends with Elon Musk?

You do not have to agree with Eva’s views to think that in a free and democratic society she should have the right to share them. After all, it wasn’t that long ago that a certain Keir Starmer was urging the British people to elect as prime minister a man who described the Islamist terrorists Hamas and Hezbollah as “friends.”[1]

What we are witnessing is not about national security. It is not about public safety. It is not about “extremism.”  It is about control.

It is about what I pointed to in a television debate this week – “authoritarian progressivism” – an instinctive impulse that runs through Keir Starmer, the Labour government, and even the British state to shut down and sideline any views that happen to challenge their failing policies.

They cannot inspire the people, so they try to control the people. They cannot win the arguments, so they try to shut them down.

And this is not an isolated case.  As I have written before, it is part of a much wider pattern – one that should deeply worry anyone who still thinks Britain is a free country that values individual liberty.

In recent weeks and months, we learned that computer games now warn British children that feeling concerned about mass immigration is “far-right.”

We discovered Home Office guidance that quietly blurs the line between terrorism and “counter-cultural” views, viewing conservatives as being somehow equivalent to terrorists.

We watched police turn up at people’s doors for tweets, retweets, jokes, opinions, even throwing people in jail because they happened to share strident remarks about immigration and broken borders on social media.

The message from the British state is becoming unmistakable: challenge the consensus and expect consequences.

This is why this latest case really matters.

Related: My Plan for 2026: Something Big Is Coming, Matt Goodwin, 14 January 2026

It is about whether ordinary citizens are still allowed to question policies that are clearly failing – on immigration, on crime, on social cohesion – without being smeared, surveilled or silenced.

Eva Vlaardingerbroek is not British. But that’s almost beside the point. Because if the state can arbitrarily decide that a peaceful speaker is “not conducive to the public good,” with no explanation and no appeal, then nobody is safe from that logic.

Today, it is a Dutch activist who has called for an end to mass immigration. A few months ago, it was French intellectual Renaud Camus who was banned from entering the country because he had dared to suggest the peoples of Western nations are being “replaced.” A few years before that, it was Dutch politician Geert Wilders who suggested Western nations are at risk of “Islamification.”

Tomorrow, it could be me. It could be you. It could be any one of us who happen to share views that collide with the groupthink that is being forced upon us by a remote and self-serving ruling class.

As Eva herself said, with bitter irony: “I’m a 29-year-old lawyer with no criminal record. But I have an opinion, and apparently that’s my crime.”  Exactly.

This is the same Britain where ministers lecture us endlessly about democracy, tolerance, human rights and free speech.

The same Britain that claims moral authority on the world stage. The same Britain where politicians were “outraged” by President Trump and Vice-President Vance suggesting that Britain and Europe might have a very big problem with free speech. And the same Britain that now seems incapable of distinguishing between actual threats and ideological dissent.

Britain has not become authoritarian overnight. But it is drifting – steadily, quietly – towards something far colder and more illiberal than most people realise.

And cases like Eva’s matter precisely because they expose the truth. And the truth is now inescapable.

Britain, once the home of individual liberty and free speech, is no longer a country that is confident enough to debate ideas. It is a country that is increasingly afraid of them.

[[1] Note added by The Exposé: In 2009, Jeremy Corbyn, former leader of the Labour Party, referred to Hamas and Hezbollah as “friends” and invited them to speak at an event in the UK Parliament.]

About the Author

Matthew Goodwin is a British political scientist and commentator known for his research on populism and right-wing movements. He was a professor of politics at the University of Kent until July 2024.

Goodwin has authored several books, including ‘Values, Voice and Virtue: The New British Politics’ and ‘National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy’ (co-authored with Roger Eatwell), and ‘Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain’ (co-authored with Robert Ford).

You can follow him on Substack, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter/X and Facebook.

Featured image: Eva Vlaardingerbroek

Expose News: Blonde bombshell in the UK? Sources say Conservatives are banned, but extremists get a free pass! What's going on?!

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Rhoda Wilson
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joy N.
Joy N.
1 hour ago

🙏🙏
What the Holy Bible says of this horrific decade just ahead of us.. Here’s a site expounding current global events in the light of bible prophecy.. To understand more, pls visit 👇 https://bibleprophecyinaction.blogspot.com/

Petra
Petra
37 minutes ago

Someone telling the plain TRUTH is considered dangerous in a country that deliberately imported thousands of Islamic Pakistani CHILD RAPISTS and did nothing to stop them grooming White British Children.

Sorry, the U.K. is lost.