Breaking News

If A Weaker Virus Is Killing More People, then the Host Must Have Been Weakened

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In his second “Red Pill Podcast” Joel Smalley answers the question: was the cure worse than the disease? In other words, “Is there evidence of increased mortality associated with the mRNA injections?”

He continued: “Given the glorification of the novel therapy, and incessant propaganda claiming it is ‘safe and effective’, you might wonder why I would even consider asking such an audacious question?”


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


By Joel Smalley

In the last episode, I presented the case that the UK government’s response to Covid as a public health threat was disproportionate. The mortality data did not support the premise that Covid was the “biggest threat faced by the UK in decades” and certainly did not merit the “most significant set of restrictions on British life in living memory”.

Following on, today, I’m going to be answering the question “Covid-19 – was the cure worse than the disease?” In other words, “Is there evidence of increased mortality associated with the mRNA injections?”

Given the glorification of the novel therapy, and incessant propaganda claiming it is “safe and effective”, you might wonder why I would even consider asking such an audacious question?

But by now, you will know that I will attempt to answer the question objectively. I hope to provide a phlegmatic response based on the evidence in the public mortality data which will contrast with the dogma spun out by the mainstream media.

With a bit of luck, I might encourage you to question for yourself if the benefits of this experimental medical intervention outweigh the risks as Boris Johnson assured us on 7th April last year.

And once you question that as well as questioning the nature of the public health threat, you will be well on your way to recognising that the official Covid narrative lacks evidence on every point.

For context, let’s take a brief look at seasonal excess mortality in England.

Every year, June to August represents the baseline of mortality above which deaths rise for the subsequent nine months.

Drawing a straight line through cumulative mortality for the first three months and plotting the excess above it for the rest of the year, allows us to compare seasonal excess mortality across different years, normalised to its summer baseline.

Up until spring 2020 when Covid first emerges, the seasonal pattern is quite consistent, rising modestly in autumn before accelerating in winter and levelling off in spring.

The out-of-season timing and magnitude of the Covid epidemic is evident. However, after an early but not unusual rise in mortality the following autumn, winter mortality 2020-21 is every bit as severe as during the spring ‘20 epidemic “in spite” of the mass program of mRNA injecting. This kind of explosion in mortality must be triggered by something, it’s not natural.

There is no apparent extraordinary mortality event in 2021-22. The tail-off is due to delays in registering deaths, nothing more, and will be examined in more detail later.

Looking at the daily deaths time series, we can accurately identify two obvious distributions.

The first starts at the beginning of September 2020 and appears to be waning in early December.

However, the second distribution explodes on 8th December 2020, the exact date that the mass injection program begins.

Both distributions run concurrently until the end of March 2021.

If we zoom in on the range between September ’20 and March ’21, we can fit Gompertz distributions to prove that the distributions are continuous and complete, i.e., that none of the policy interventions at the time had any impact.

So, having identified a significant increase in mortality concurrent with the rollout of the mRNA injections, how did this manifest in total deaths for different age groups for the same period that we examined last time – June to May?

For the over 65s, deaths in 2020-21, the first year of the mRNA injections, were 35,000 higher than usual, compared to 53,000 in 2019-20, the year of Covid. This is a drop of 34% and should not be unexpected due to the vulnerable population being much smaller and also a virus that would be naturally weaker.

Estimating 7,150 deaths that occurred but were not yet registered when the data was published for the year ending May ’22, there were 23,000 more deaths than usual, a drop of 56% from the Covid epidemic year.

For the over 40 to 64s, deaths in 2020-21, the first year of the mRNA injections, were 9,300 higher than usual, compared to 5,700 in 2019-20, the year of Covid. This is an increase of 63% and should be unexpected due to the vulnerable population being much smaller and also a virus that would be naturally weaker.

Estimating 8,300 deaths that occurred but were not yet registered when the data was published for the year ending May ’22, there were 9,400 more deaths than usual, an increase of 65% from the Covid epidemic year.

For the 5 to 34s, there remains very little change in deaths in any year since Covid first emerged.

So, is the vaccine safe and effective based on the evidence in the public data? Have thousands of lives been saved?

If this is true, how come more than 3,000 more people aged between 40 and 64 have died in each full year since the mRNA injections were administered when we would naturally expect fewer deaths?

I have shown again that interventions did not have any impact on mortality and the virus naturally favours less virulent mutations. So, if a weaker virus is killing more people, the host must have been weakened. It is the most plausible explanation.

Is there scientific evidence to support that hypothesis? The Substacks of Robert MaloneIgor ChudovPaul AlexanderGeert Vanden BosscheEl Gato Malo, and many others are replete with rigorous scientific explanations.

To claim ignorance at this late stage would be the feeblest of defences for anyone who is still supporting the injections in any way.

The data and the scientific research are overwhelming now but could we have known sooner and saved thousands of lives lost due to the mRNA injections?

We did try as early as March last year. Simply asking questions earned you the reputation as an “anti-vaxxer” and a fair few censorships and deplatforms.

I hope that alone should make you ask a few more?

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News

Tagged as:

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
1 month ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] If A Weaker Virus Is Killing More People, then the Host Must Have Been Weakened […]

Stephanie
Stephanie
1 month ago

since the wax destroys the natural immune system, it’s no wonder this is happening

PureBlood1778
PureBlood1778
1 month ago

My 75 year old aunt texted me last night to tell me she and my uncle tested positive for Covid. I drove to their house at 12:30 AM and dropped off Ivermectin pills, HCQ, zinc, and Quercetin. She told me today her fever came down and that I may have saved her life. Uncle is feeling great. This is considered a negative outcome by the cabal. They would prefer my family dead. Their evil is no longer a theory and very much a reality. You can get your ivm by visiting https://ivmpharmacy.com

Rabbitnexus
Rabbitnexus
Reply to  PureBlood1778
1 month ago

So glad you included zinc. That’s the cure and the ivermectin and HCQ are just ionophores, to carry it into cells. So many do not seem to get this. Without extra zinc it’s a hit and miss thing.

Christopher Schulz
Christopher Schulz
Reply to  PureBlood1778
1 month ago

The inevitable inflammatory response comes within 5-7 days,
should monitor oxygen with pulse oximeter, it could still go down to around 89-90. Naproxen is Anti-SARS & Flu, So is Melatonin.
then the numbers should creep back up to 96

Frank S.
Frank S.
1 month ago

Acc. to Dr. David Martin (Greg Hunter 6/28), he’s fairly certain everyone has Spike Proteins through the vaxxed ‘shedding’. These alone (though toxic) give us the COVID symptoms (inc. Delta, Omicron, etc.) even in unvaxxed people..I believe the Spike Protein itself cannot replicate, or induce cells to reproduce it. Only those vaxxed with mRNA can do that.

Rabbitnexus
Rabbitnexus
Reply to  Frank S.
1 month ago

I’d agree with this. The Fauci Fleas are also getting into pets. Dogs, cats and rabbits (which I can personally attest to). There’s a cure for this, it works as well in rabbits anyway, as in humans. I’m very aware of Fauci Fleas, having had COVID I can smell the vaxxed and get instantly sick around them, which passes almost as quickly as I leave their presence. I used Dhamasa, (Fagonia Arabica) to cure my own long term problems after COVID and also to cure my rabbits. One I got at 14 weeks came from a fully vaxxed family and was having severe spasms several times day and she was pregnant at this time. I treated her with Dhamasa in her feed for a few weeks and stopped her symptoms in days. The babies when born began dying suddenly from heart attacks with no warning at around 5-6 months before I realised they’d inherited the problem and was only able to save one by administering the same Dhamasa. It was a shocking eye opener to see the results in such short order. It’s a herb, sold on eBay and Amazon etc usually from India. For people a heaped teaspoon twice a day in a small glass of water. Take it for a few months I’d suggest. I cured my heart disease with it years ago, how I knew about it. With heart disease I suggest using it for a year. It is not commonly known, I’ve been talking about it for a few years and because of this there’s some aware of it. I discovered it’s use as a cure, so don’t be surprised if you don’t find much on this aspect of its use. It definitely works. So effective I cannot overstate it.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] – If A Weaker Virus Is Killing More People, then the Host Must Have Been Weakened […]

Rabbitnexus
Rabbitnexus
1 month ago

We used to say there’s no cure for stupid. Now there’s a vax for that.

Christopher Schulz
Christopher Schulz
1 month ago

Turns out, early home treatment with an antiviral regimen to thwart
viral load, thus mitigate the inevitable inflammatory response was the
proper strategy all along. When the virus struck back in Nov 2020 I was
already prepared with Pulse Oximeter, Temp Gun & a simple protocol of:
Naproxen, Melatonin, VitD3+Zinc. Worked for me
From Naproxen Repurposing to Naproxen Analogues and Their Antiviral Activity against Influenza A Virus | Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (acs.org)

trackback
1 month ago

[…] You can listen to the first episode HERE and read about the second episode HERE. […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] You can listen to the first episode HERE and read about the second episode HERE. […]