Breaking News

Book Review: ‘Covid-19: The Great Reset’ (Part 2, Centralisation)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Klaus & Co. have sold 250,000+ copies of this book. It would shock me if 250+ people have actually finished it, tweeted Critical Sway. “I’m one of those people and frankly, I can understand if you don’t want to be next. [So] let me help.”

Three key themes emerge from the book:

  1. Pandemic Severity – of the virus, the control measures, the economic fallout
  2. Centralisation – World governance, coordination, public-private partnerships
  3. Societal Shifts – Human behaviour, equality, ESG

We’ll tackle one at a time.  This will be a big job. So, I’m splitting it up:

Critical Sway on Twitter, HERE and HERE

Below is Critical Sway’s Twitter thread.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


Chapter 2 – Centralisation

Klaus & Co. are back with their campaign for:

  • → Centralisation
  • → Global Governance
  • → Public-Private Partnerships

Can they make a case? Let’s find out…

COVID-19: The Great Reset by Klaus Schwab & Thierry Mallaret.

It’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s a book.

  • → Klaus is founder & exec. chair of the WEF
  • → Nobody’s ever heard of Mallaret, but he’s from the WEF too

Chapter 1 – Pandemic Severity (in case you missed it, “ICYMI”) HERE.

Chapter 2 (right here & now) is all about centralisation.  Following are some ideas from Klaus & Co. that focus on:

  • → Increasing the role of government
  • → Centralising decision making
  • → Interfering with markets

You will probably be able to sense my disdain.

If you read the first instalment of the series, you already know Klaus & Co. don’t set the bar all that high. In any case, this rare and brilliant insight will give you a feel for the tone…

Apparently, everything is connected to everything else.

Then this one… (stay with me a moment, I’m building up to a point here).

Ok, I agree with Klaus & Co. on some things:

  • → We have complex interactions to consider
  • → Those interactions cut across various spheres of expertise
  • → Experts find it difficult or impossible to work outside of their own disciplines

So, what are we to make of this???

I would describe that as a conclusive list of reasons NOT to centralise decision-making. Klaus & Co. see it as a great opportunity TO centralise decision-making. Just like the aftermath of WW2:

1. The inference here is that the aftermath of Covid-19 is similar to the aftermath of WW2.  QUICK STATS…

  • COVID-19 → 6.5 million deaths*
  • WW2 → 40 to 50 million deaths

*Without discussing “died of” vs “died with”.

2. Entire books have been written about the institutions Klaus & Co. chose to mention as examples.  I’ll ask you this: How well are those institutions doing vs their original purpose?

  • Bretton Woods → Economic Stability
  • The UN → World Peace
  • The EU → Peace & Prosperity

Klaus & Co. move on to tell us about the future role of government in society:

Look, I’m a free market, libertarian-leaning kind of guy. Klaus and I were never going to see eye-to-eye on this.  For the record, I think increasing the role of government is a terrible idea that might be in the interests of a select few people, but not the rest of us.

Next, we read about private companies becoming more involved in the mitigation of global risks.  Or, said another way – governments becoming more involved in the affairs of private, profit-making enterprises.  What could go wrong?

Klaus & Co. say that the WTO and WHO are underfunded.  I say underfunded is not as good as defunded, but you have to start somewhere.

Oh, BTW…

The WHO budget for the 2022/2023 biennium is $6.72 billion. Whether that could reasonably be described as “underfunded” is a subjective judgement, I suppose.  You can guess my opinion on the matter.

Of course, you can’t talk about the WHO without talking about Bill Gates…

I’m not sure why Klaus & Co. find this comment from Bill “compelling”.  Apart from the fact that he said it.   And I mean, he’s kind of invested… he would say this, wouldn’t he?

Guess what else Klaus & Co. predict will become the subject of centralised, top-down control? → Minimum wages.  Via increased regulation.

I predict that would be a net negative.  I’m not going to try and explain why in a tweet.  Richard Ebeling, via the Mises Institute, does a far better job of it than I could anyway:

Freedom and the Minimum Wage, Mises Wire, 13 February 2018

One final contradiction – just in case Klaus & Co. haven’t done enough of that yet…

We went from this:

“The shock that the pandemic has inflicted on the global economy has been MORE SEVERE and has occurred MUCH FASTER than ANYTHING ELSE in RECORDED HISTORY.”

To this:

And finally… If there is ANY doubt left in your mind that Klaus Schwab thinks we should have global governance… This quote should settle it:

Klaus & Co. clearly like the idea of centralised powers who can rule over the world.

I don’t.

Excessive concentration of power is a recipe for disaster, no matter who wields it.  Eventually, someone with genuinely evil intent seizes control. That is inevitable.  And, in 2022, it might have already happened.

Thanks for reading and I hope you’ll be back to check out the final instalment. Chapter 3 is all about the societal changes foretold by Klaus & Co.

P.S. There’s always the chance that I’ll push my luck too far and get shut down one day. If you want to make certain we stay in touch, you can sign up for my newsletter with this LINK. No spam, I promise.

You can find Critical Sway’s full Twitter thread on ThreadReader App HERE or, in the event it is removed from Twitter, in the copy attached below.

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
17 days ago

[…] RHODA WILSON ON SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 • ( LEAVE A COMMENT […]

Nigel Watson
Nigel Watson
17 days ago

The likes of Price Charles can do one. I won’t be worshipping mother earth or other guff. The BBC still want us to worship the Queen like she’s a god. My latest YouTube: in the age of ego & self-love, who should you look up to?

trackback
17 days ago

[…] RHODA WILSON ON SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 • ( LEAVE A COMMENT […]

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
17 days ago

Got too love how Schwab and the WEF lie and nobody questions it.

A fairer society … having nothing and be happy is what he intends for us is not the same as him having everything and being ecstatic.

That is his promise … figuring that wind/solar produces only a fraction of the energy of fossil fuels then the pandemic is his population cull to make sure demand does not exceed supply.

He really thinks we are all stupid and chances are his IQ is not much over 120 if that and doubt he can run a mile so he is giving himself a free pass into his great reset soley by all the money and wealth he has manged to steal from people.

Criminals run the world now.

trackback
17 days ago

[…] – Book Review: ‘Covid-19: The Great Reset’ (Part 2, Centralisation): […]

Budanevey
Budanevey
17 days ago

“Public-Private Partnerships” is Corporatism, which Roosevelt called “Fascism”. Mussolini himself used the word “syndicalism”. That’s the World the Globalists are making, one in which individual rights are subordinated to “arrangements of hierarchies” like governments partnering with Big Tech to violate Free Speech and Data Privacy, governments partnering with ESG Corporations to impose Mandates that break the Nuremberg Code, and governments partnering with Big Finance to rig investment etc. Entire populations are now governed by “arrangements” behind closed doors, World Bank, Central Bank, Merchant Bank, Equity Fund Cartels steering money to ESG goals, the WEF, IMF, WHO, Club of Rome, Chatham House, Rockefellers, Gates Foundation, EU, NATO, NGOs. The EU calls them “Social Partners”. There is no place for Individual Rights in this paradigm, which are also being eroded through “Public-Private” Lawfare networks, partisan agencies, officials, attorneys and judges.

Matthew
Matthew
16 days ago

That’s a lot of words for what amounts to ‘most of you have to die so we can have more’.