Breaking News

Lack of access to HCQ was a major factor in covid deaths, a new study finds

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A study published yesterday in the journal Science, Public Health Policy & the Law found that countries which restricted access to hydroxychloroquine (“HCQ”) had higher covid fatalities.

“Estimates indicate that if all countries where HCQ access was restricted had made HCQ available, covid-19 fatalities would have been reduced by about 520,000,” the study authors stated.

The study also found that policies such as lockdowns, travel restrictions or mask requirements had no effect on covid fatalities.

When HCQ is mentioned as a treatment we cannot help but remember the late Dr. Vladimir Zelenko who treated thousands of coronavirus patients in 2020 using hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and zinc sulphate with a 99.9% success rate (2 deaths).  Dr. Zelenko’s treatment protocol was adopted by President Donald Trump and then undermined by Anthony Fauci.

Further reading:


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Deadly Policy: Peer-Reviewed Cross-Country Study Finds That Routine Hydroxychloroquine Access May Have Prevented Over 520,000 Covid-19 Deaths

By James Lyons-Weiler

Countries that restricted access to hydroxychloroquine had higher fatalities. National lockdowns had no effect on fatalities.

A comprehensive cross-country analysis to identify the factors affecting covid-19 infections and fatalities found that lack of access to hydroxychloroquine was a major factor in driving covid-19 deaths.

The study, ‘Access to Hydroxychloroquine Is Associated with Reduced COVID-19 Mortality: A Cross-Country Analysis’, which was published yesterday in the Public Health Policy Research section of the IPAK PHPI open-access journal Science, Public Health Policy & the Law, controlled for other variables like obesity, urbanisation, age, healthcare infrastructure, and policy responses such as lockdowns and travel restrictions.

A key finding of the studies included was a robust negative relationship between access to HCQ and covid-19 fatalities. Countries that restricted access to hydroxychloroquine had higher fatalities. The analysis model resulted in an estimate that around 520,000 fatalities could have been avoided if HCQ had been made widely available in countries where it was restricted.

The study also found that obesity, older populations, fewer hospital beds, and less sunshine were associated with higher rates of infection and fatalities.

In contrast to these factors, which were significant across multiple models, national lockdowns were never significantly associated with lowered mortality rates, and local lockdowns were only significantly associated with lowered mortality rates in one model. The study therefore found that policies like lockdowns, travel restrictions, and mask mandates were generally not associated with a reduction in fatalities. PCR testing was, positively associated with reported infections, but not with fatalities, which the authors attribute to the high false positive rate of the use of non-quantitative PCR testing to assess covid-19 diagnostic status.

A strong point in the study’s design is the author’s address of the issue of endogeneity. The authors used malaria prevalence as an instrumental variable for HCQ availability and found the result was robust and not due to confounding variables. Endogeneity in this context refers to the potential problem that the relationship between HCQ availability and covid-19 fatalities might be confounded by unobserved variables or reverse causality. The authors found that endogeneity was not an issue for the relationship between HCQ and fatalities.

Public Health and Policy Implications

The negative association between HCQ availability and fatalities is an important one. Policies on HCQ availability and use should be reconsidered given these results, which should be interpreted in light of the massive compilation of studies that show a net protective effect of early use of hydroxychloroquine in the covid-19 public health and clinical settings (now 552 studies; c19hcq.org). Countries that have restricted the use of HCQ in the past should now abandon the deadly policy.

HCQ for covid-19: real-time analysis of all 552 studies (c19hcq.org)

The totality of evidence available on hydroxychloroquine efficacy provides a good starting point for further research and policy discussion.

About the Author

James Lyons-Weiler is a research scientist and author of the books ‘Cures vs. Profits’, ‘Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism’, and  ‘Ebola: An Evolving Story’.  He shares his research and interpretation on the IPAK Knowledge website and through courses offered by IPAK Edu.  He also publishes articles on his Substack page ‘Popular RationalismHERE.

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
2 months ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

christine.257
christine.257
2 months ago

And this is the only free cure for a Covid infection which anyone can do whether they are poor or wealthy: Covid Crusher
3 minutes from preparation to job done!!
Everything else you have read, or heard, is totally irrelevant – how simple is that
Covid Crusher: Mix one heaped teaspoon of Iodine table salt in a mug of warm clean water, cup a hand and sniff or snort the entire mugful up your nose, spitting out anything which comes down into your mouth. If sore, then you have a virus, so continue morning noon and night, or more often if you want, until the soreness goes away (2-3 minutes) then blow out your nose and flush away, washing your hands afterwards, until when you do my simple cure, you don’t have any soreness at all, when you flush – job done. Also swallow a couple of mouthfuls of salt water and if you have burning in your lungs, salt killing virus and pneumonia, there too.
My simple salt water cure, kills all Coronaviruses and viruses, as soon as you think you have an infection, or while self isolating, before the viruses mutate into the disease in your head and body, for which there is no cure – that is, after you have been out shopping, or mixing with people with potentially, Omicron or Delta viruses, or any other virus.
It washes behind the eyes, the brain bulb, brain stem (Long Covid), The Escutcheon Tubes to the inner ears and the top of the throat which is at a point roughly level with half way up your ears and not where your mouth is and down the back of your throat, when sore.
I have been doing this simple cure for over 30 years and I am and others, never sick from viruses and there is no reason why any of you should be either – when your only alternative are those vaccines!!
I do my simple preparation, after I have been out and about, or come into contact with people who have been vaccinated – it has kept me safe – and I hope it keeps me safe for the foreseeable future as Graphene Oxide is in the very air we breathe, outside, as well, but now from the vaccinated!!
Simply put, if the inside of your nose is dry and crusty, you are OK, if your nose is runny, you really need to do a salt water sniffle as quickly as possible and monitor the results, to see if further salt water sniffles are necessary, but later on in that evening – so far – I remain immune from potential Covid infections, doing just this.
For 30 years, I have NEVER been ill from viral infections and there is no reason why you should be either, if you do as I do and it costs zero too Yes, I get the viruses, but this is how I stop them from infecting me and how I have avoided vaccines (which don’t work) like the plague they are, in my opinion – AND THERE IS STILL CLEAN SEA WATER TO USE INSTEAD.
Nobody has been injured or killed by my above salt water cure

idbodbi
idbodbi
Reply to  christine.257
2 months ago

…and add a pinch or two of calcium chloride, heat two minutes in the microwave on high, let cool. To prevent bacteria in the brain.

Chris C
Chris C
2 months ago

How much more nonsense are we going to hear about HCQ and Ivermectin as banned cures for “covid” symptoms.

“Covid” does not exist: it is rebranded flu or common cold that are healing or detoxing periods caused by electromagnetic field effects on cells, bad diet or environmental toxins or lack of sunlight.

We are surrounded by drug pushers instead of naturopaths.

marlene
marlene
2 months ago

This was no oversight. It worked to depopulate a half million more. Just another possible cure held back.

trackback
2 months ago

[…] –  Lack of access to HCQ was a major factor in covid deaths, a new study finds […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] journal Science, Public Health Policy & the Law just published a study showing that in countries where hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was restricted from use during the Wuhan coronavirus […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] journal Science, Public Health Policy & the Law just published a study showing that in countries where hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was restricted from use during the Wuhan coronavirus […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] journal Science, Public Health Policy & the Law just published a study showing that in countries where hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was restricted from use during the Wuhan coronavirus […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] journal Science, Public Health Policy & the Law just published a study showing that in countries where hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was restricted from use during the Wuhan coronavirus […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] montrant que dans les pays où l’hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) a été restreinte à l’utilisation pendant le coronavirus de Wuhan ( COVID-19 ) « pandémique, » beaucoup plus de personnes sont mortes par rapport au nombre de morts dans les pays où les citoyens étaient libres de prendre autant de HCQ qu’ils le voulaient sans ingérence du gouvernement. […]