|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
On Monday, The Telegraph reported that a London-based Hamas operative was behind Greta Thunberg’s silly “aid” yacht bound for Gaza. Zaher Birawi, who was described in Parliament as a person with links to Hamas, called himself a “founding member” of the Freedom Flotilla International Coalition, which arranged the voyage.
Hamas is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood in Gaza. The Muslim Brotherhood’s only aim is to control the world through Islam. So, who controls the Muslim Brotherhood?
Is it the Rothschilds or is there a Jewish connection, as some suspect? Not according to Walter Veith’s research, who provides evidence that Islam was started by the Roman Catholic Church. To this day, Veith says, Islam, which is the religion introduced to initiates at the highest levels of Freemasonry, is still under the control of Rome.
And the Vatican is collaborating with the United Nations (“UN”), with the aim of installing a one world religion with the Pope as its spokesperson.
Is it surprising that a UN puppet, Thunberg, collaborates with a Hamas operative, which is also a UN collaborator?
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Table of Contents
What is the Muslim Brotherhood?
The Muslim Brotherhood was founded in Ismailia, Egypt, by Hassan al-Banna in March 1928. It was started as a social and religious club by a twenty-two-year-old schoolteacher, who recruited six members of the Suez Canal Company.
According to founder al-Banna, “It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet.”
Al-Banna wrote that the Islamic flag must be raised again in the territories once ruled by Islam: “Thus, Andalusia (Spain), Sicily, the Balkans, the Italian coast, as well as the islands of the Mediterranean are all Muslim Mediterranean colonies, and they must return to the embrace of Islam.”
Al-Banna was a sympathiser, if not an admirer, of Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler. In 2021, the Egyptian-German scholar Hamed Abdel-Samad said that al-Banna admired Hitler and modelled the Muslim Brotherhood on the Nazi Party, noting that the Muslim Brotherhood, like the Nazi Party, is a political party that relies on an armed militia and has an “ideology of an inspiring leader-saviour.”
The Brotherhood now has branches in 70 countries and territories, including its main contingents in Egypt, Syria, Gaza, Libya, Tunisia and Jordan.
The Muslim Brotherhood is always working to spread its ideas throughout Egypt and the Middle East to gain more followers. They work on almost all social levels, including schools, universities, mosques, politics and professional offices. One main strategy of the Brotherhood is to utilise a grassroots network of social and charitable organisations to expand its membership base, gain trust and demonstrate Islam’s relevance in all aspects of life.
Terrorism: Muslim Brotherhood, Jewish Virtual Library
According to Al Jazeera, the members of the Muslim Brotherhood represent a broad spectrum of interpretations of the initial ideology of its founder, Hassan al-Banna. “The [Muslim Brotherhood] officially renounced violence in the 1970s during the rule of Egyptian President Anwar el-Sadat,” Al Jazeera said. Mmmm …
In June 2011, the Egyptian official news agency recognised the Muslim Brotherhood as a legitimate political party for the first time since it was outlawed by the government in 1954. Recognised as the Freedom and Justice Party, the Brotherhood was permitted to run in parliamentary elections scheduled for late 2011. Writing about the Muslim Brotherhood’s (“MB’s”) political gain in Egypt and beyond, Al Jazeera noted:
In late 2011, Tunisia’s Ennahda party (an Islamist party inspired by the MB) won the first parliamentary elections to be held in the country after the overthrow of President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali. In 2012, the Muslim Brotherhood ran a candidate in the post-Arab Spring presidential elections in Egypt.
Other than Egypt, which is the birthplace of the Muslim Brotherhood, there are [political] parties that can be considered offshoots of the Muslim Brotherhood in a number of Arab countries, as they were inspired by the core tenets of MB ideology. These include Hamas in Palestine, the Ennahda party in Tunisia, and Kuwait’s Islamic Constitutional Movement.
In Jordan, the Muslim Brotherhood is represented in the Islamic Action Front, the political wing that is one of the largest blocs in the Jordanian parliament. It broke formal ties with the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood after the 2013 coup in Egypt. In Bahrain, the political arm of its Muslim Brotherhood group is known as the Minbar.
Not all Islamist parties are MB, a clear example of that is the Salafi movement of Egypt, which was Islamist in nature, but chose its own path in various political situations.
What is the Muslim Brotherhood? Al Jazeera, 18 June 2017
Muslim Brotherhood’s Plan for the West
It’s not only in the Middle East that the Muslim Brotherhood is spreading its ideology. The organisation also maintains active branches in the United Kingdom, France and numerous other European countries, as well as in the United States. A 2002 article published by the Intelligence Resource Program states, “Today, a very complex financial network connects the operations of over seventy branches of the Muslim Brothers worldwide.”
In addition to official branches, there are organisations worldwide that have either been established by people with strong personal ties to the Brotherhood but which operate completely independently or are influenced by the Brotherhood through people with some ties to it.
Related: What is the real aim of so-called pro-Palestinian activists?
During a US Subcommittee on National Security in July 2018, Ron DeSantis, who was chairing the meeting, said: “Muslim Brotherhood networks raise money here in the US to support Hamas’ terrorist activities in the Middle East. According to the Department of Justice, in the early 1990s, Hamas’ parent organisation, the Muslim Brotherhood, planned to establish a network of organisations in the US to spread a militant Islamist message and raise money for Hamas.”
Related: Muslim Brotherhood and Jama’at-i Islami, Pew Research Centre, 15 September 2010
The video below was aired by the Norwegian TV2 channel in November 2010. The reporter spoke with Kamil Al Najjar from England, who knows the Muslim Brotherhood better than most because he was a member of the organisation in his homeland. After defecting, he still received death threats.
Hassan al-Banna transformed Islam from a religion to a political ideology. “Almost in every country in the world, they have a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood,” he said. “They are trying to deceive the people, and they have managed to deceive a lot of Western politicians into believing them. And their only aim is to control the world with Islam and establish Islamic governments around the world.”
Al Najjar said that Islamists have an agenda for Europe. “For the West, their aim is to [inaudible] the West because they know they cannot use force to convert the West. So, they use the ‘seed’.”
Related:
- Muslim Brotherhood has plans to subvert European countries from the bottom up
- Kevork Almassian: Glorification of Islamic State, Syrian massacres and the geopolitics that supports them
Zionist Conspiracy Theory Comes to the Aid
Earlier this year, Moomen Sallam, a former leader in the Muslim Brotherhood chapter in Egypt, joined Yasmine Mohammed to discuss how the Brotherhood operates both in Egypt and on a global scale in Europe and North America. They also discussed Egypt’s role in the war in Gaza and the recent chaos in Syria.
Moomen Sallam is a leading voice amongst freethinkers in Egypt and the author of several articles and books, including ‘ABC Secularism’and‘ABC Liberalism’, and co-author of ‘Egypt and Israel: Forty Years in the Desert of Cold Peace’.
Sallam stated that it was only when he joined the Muslim Brotherhood that the veil was lifted. To those outside the organisation, they champion freedom and democracy but within the organisation, they are anything but. He said he was shocked to discover that the organisation operates with an opaque, top-down, dictatorial approach. Questioning or criticising the way the organisation is run, its ideology or its members is not tolerated. Spies are everywhere, he said, with members listening, watching and reporting anything said by other members that the leaders may disapprove of.
He also described what happened within the Muslim Brotherhood during Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait, which gives us an insight into how the perceived “liberation” of Jerusalem isn’t only about “liberating” Jerusalem.
Muslim and Arab nationalists always describe the “liberation” of Jerusalem through liberating places that are between them and Jerusalem, he explained. For example, if on the way to Jerusalem, they pass by Kuwait, Muslim and Arab nationalists will say, “If we want to liberate Jerusalem, we have to first change the regime in Kuwait.” In this case, Muslim and Arab nationalists would have been saying to themselves, “Saddam Hussein will unite all Arab and Muslim countries and lead us all to ‘free Palestine from the river to the sea’,” Sallman said.
But Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait split the Muslim Brotherhood. Some, such as the Muslim Brotherhood of Jordan, Hamas, the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (“PLO”) and almost all of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle East and North Africa took the view described above, Sallam said. “They took the side of Saddam Hussein. That was very stupid.”
On the other hand, the Muslim Brotherhood of the Gulf didn’t take Hussein’s side because Kuwait was “one of their countries.” So, for the Muslim Brotherhood of Kuwait and the Muslim Brotherhood of Saudi Arabia, Hussain’s invasion of Kuwait represented a conflict of interest.
The Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt didn’t know which side to back; whether they should stand with “the main block of the Muslim Brotherhood or with the Muslim Brotherhood of the Gulf, who are the main [financial] sponsors,” Sallam said.
It was a bad situation between those who backed Hussein and those who backed Kuwait, Sallam said. When the American, British and Egyptian armies went to Saudi Arabia to liberate Kuwait from Hussein, “of course, the conspiracy theory came out again … that this is a plan made by the Zionists,” he said. Mohammed added, “It’s always the Jews,” meaning that, as always, accusations against the Jews are used to deflect attention or blame.
Related: Gulf War, Wikipedia via EncycloReader
Rothschild and the Suez Canal
Some claim that the Muslim Brotherhood is a Rothschild family project, presumably because of the connection of early members of the Muslim Brotherhood to the Suez Canal Company. But even a cursory glance at history and the timing of events suggests this theory doesn’t hold much water.
Ferdinand de Lesseps was a French diplomat and entrepreneur who secured the necessary political and financial support to construct the Suez Canal. The canal opened in 1869 and connected the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea, significantly reducing travel distances between Europe and East Asia. The construction of the canal began in 1859 and was completed in 1869.
Related: Who built the Suez Canal? How Britain gained ownership of the canal and the Suez crisis, The i Paper, 25 May 2023
The Rothschilds, originally named Bauer, are a powerful banking family with roots in Germany. According to Fritz Springmeier, “The oldest known Rothschild went by the name of Uri Feibesch who lived [possibly in Frankfurt] in the early 16th century. His descendants lived in the House of Red Shield. His great, great, great, great-grandson was Moses Bauer, who lived in the early 18th century … The Bauer line continues today, but in the 1700s, one man re-named his branch of the family [Rothschild] after its symbol and address – the Red Shield or the Seal of Solomon.”
But as Springmeyer acknowledged, definitive facts are difficult to find. “The truth is sometimes hard to tell. The stories the family weave are hard to distinguish from the truth. Myths are one of their best weapons, and a researcher must be wary,” he wrote.
The Rothschilds played a significant role in European finance and were involved in various major projects, including the financing of the Suez Canal. Lionel de Rothschild, a member of the family, was instrumental in helping the British government purchase shares in the Suez Canal in 1875.
In 1875, the London banking house of N. M. Rothschild & Sons advanced the Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli, acting for the British Government, £4 million to purchase Suez Canal shares. This transaction was crucial in securing British influence over the Suez Canal, which had a profound impact on global trade and colonial interests.
The funds were repaid within five months, but the purchase was controversial, with accusations that Disraeli had undermined Britain’s constitutional system by not seeking parliamentary consent.
The Suez Canal Company was originally a joint-stock company headquartered in Paris, with France holding 52 per cent of shares and Egypt holding 44 per cent at the time of its founding. When Egypt’s viceroy, Ismāʿīl Pasha, fell into financial troubles in 1875, he sold his country’s shares to the British government, making Britain the largest shareholder of the company.
However, in July 1956, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalised the Suez Canal Company, transferring ownership to Egypt, which precipitated the Suez Crisis. Since then, the canal has been completely operated and maintained by the state-owned Suez Canal Authority of Egypt.
The Muslim Brotherhood began in 1928, at a time when the British government was the largest shareholder of the Suez Canal Company and long after any apparent involvement with the Rothschilds.
Resources:
- Suez Canal History, Britannica
- Suez Canal Company, Britannica
- The building of the Suez Canal (Timeline), Napoleon
- Lionel de Rothschild and the Suez Canal, The Rothschild Archive
- Suez Canal loan receipts, 1876, The Rothschild Archive
Islamic Connection to the Vatican
Some may say that the Muslim Brotherhood is a project of the Vatican. When asked why they would make this link, they might refer to a lecture given by Walter Veith in 2004. Although Veith doesn’t address Islamism, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, he does give details as to how the religion of Islam fits into the “mystery religions” that are under the control of the Vatican.
Walter Veith is a retired professor and researcher in medical bioscience. He abandoned his atheist and evolutionist worldview following a series of challenging events for which his scientific training offered neither explanations nor solutions. Since then, he has travelled the world, presenting thoroughly researched lectures on Bible prophecy, health, Creation science and secret societies. You can find his numerous lectures on Amazing Discoveries’ website HERE.
In 2004, Veith gave a 36-part lecture series titled ‘Total Onslaught’. Part 16 was titled ‘The Islamic Connection’, in which he presented evidence that Islam was created by the Roman Catholic Church.
‘The Islamic Connection’ has since been removed from the Amazing Discoveries’ YouTube channel. We don’t know the reasons but we should bear this in mind as it equates to a retraction, which could be for any of a variety of reasons, for example legal or other threats, or more innocuous reasons such as an inaccuracy, misquote or additional information subsequently coming to light that replaces previous information shared.
“Evangelism in Islamic countries is totally forbidden; this religion has full control of the entire territory which it controls,” Veith began his ‘The Islamic Connection’ lecture. Before digging into who or what Islam is, he explained that he had a high regard for those who followed the Islamic faith. He praised their loyalty and their principle of standing up for high moral standards.
However, in the Islamic faith, just as there is in Catholicism, “there is an inner circle and an outer circle,” he said. “That the inner circle has one faith and the outer circle gets goyim religion – the Islamic faith – and that controlling them both is a central organisation which is seated … in Rome.”
The first point Veith noted was that Muhammad’s wife, Khadījah, was a Roman Catholic. “She came from a Roman Catholic convent, so we could say she was a Roman Catholic nun. She was super rich, she lived in a convent and she had the whole of the economy, basically, in her hands. And she employed this young man Muhammad, whom she then also married,” he said.
Related: Mohammed Mustafa was born in 570 A.D. – died 632 A.D., Jah Truth
Moving on to comparing symbols, relics and rituals between Islam and the Catholic Church, Veith demonstrates how the two religions have some notable similarities. He posed the questions: “Is it possible that both religions in the inner circle worship the same lucifer but that the outer circle knows nothing about this? … Is it possible that both religions serve the same master behind the scenes and that the masses are deceived?”
At timestamp 32:54, Veith discussed claims made by a Jesuit, Alberto Rivera. Rivera claimed that the Jesuit General, Cardinal Bea, personally instructed him on the origin of Islam. According to Rivera, the Roman Catholic Church started Islam in order to take the Arabs under their control and secure Jerusalem.
Related: How The Vatican Created Islam, by Former Jesuit Priest, Alberto Rivera, The Millenium Report, December 2015
In addition to the symbolism and rituals, Catholic and Islamic insiders have an infamous organisation in common: Freemasonry. Freemasons of the highest order – 32nd Degree in the Scottish Rite and 29th Degree in the York Rite – can become Shriners, Veith said (see timestamp 48:17). The Shriners are an Arabic Order.
Quoting from James Shaw’s book ‘The Deadly Deception’, Veith said:
The Shrine (Ancient Arabic Order, Nobles of the Mystic Shrine) … the “Show Army of Masonry,” maintains a very high profile … It is necessary to be a 32nd Degree Mason for six months before being eligible to join the Shrine.
The Deadly Deception: Freemasonry Exposed by One of Its Top Leaders, James D. Shaw and Tom C. McKenney, 1988, pgs.73 and 74
Shaw stated that the Shrine is a shrine to Allah and, during Shriner events, there is a copy of the Koran on the altar:
We went into the Shrine … we began the initiation … After the medical screening came the hazing … After the hazing it was time for the serious part, the ritual, and then time to take the oath … And, with the Koran on the altar, we sealed our solemn oath in the name of “Allah, the God of Arab, Moslem and Mohammedan, the God of our fathers.”
The Deadly Deception: Freemasonry Exposed by One of Its Top Leaders, James D. Shaw and Tom C. McKenney, 1988, pgs. 74 and 75
“So,” Veith said, “Masonry is nothing other than the ‘ancient mystery religion’, and Jesuits are the ‘ancient mystery religion’, and Islam is the ‘ancient mystery religion’ behind the scenes … [and] Rome controls it all.”
By “ancient mystery religion,” Veith was referring to Gary H. Kah’s “ancient mystery religions” at the top of the secret societies hierarchy as illustrated in his 1991 book ‘En Route to Global Occupation’ (see page 94, HERE).
“Catholicism, from the beginning, has controlled Islam,” Veith said. “Islam is just a tool of esoterics to indoctrinate people in accepting a synthesis [which in this case is a union of the religions].”
“I believe there are many, many people in Islam who will see the light; who will see that they have been deceived. Just as there are many, many Catholics who will see the light that they have been deceived,” he said.
Explaining how the Catholic/Islam insiders use Islam “today” (remember this lecture was given in 2004), he said they want people to be afraid of Islam and Islamists. Because people who are afraid “will accept any changes that are necessary to meet the threat … They’re going to rub up two religions against each other; Judeo-Christian culture [and] Islamic culture, rub them up [so they] destroy each other until what is left? Synthesis. And then you have one world religion, and lucifer rejoices because he’s king.”
You can watch Veith’s eye-opening lecture below and a read study guide that accompanies it HERE.
If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it on Rumble HERE.
In part 26 of the ‘Total Onslaught’ series, Veith gave a lecture on the UN and the occult agenda. In this lecture, he exposed the real motives behind the UN’s new world order: the creation of a global religio-political system will have far-reaching consequences for every person on Earth.
The aim is that the world is going to move towards a unified world religion. What might this religion be? Veith quoted Alice Bailey, a British and American writer known for her works on Theosophy and her influence on the New Age movement. She founded the Lucis Trust in 1922, which supports the United Nations. In a 1993 World Goodwill letter, Bailey said “… the universal world religion … will neither be Christian nor heathen, neither Jew nor Gentile …” Curiously, she didn’t add “neither Islamist/Muslim nor kaffir.”
timestamp 011710
Related:
- The psychopathic religion of the Globalists shapes their decisions and actions
- United Nations and World Invocation Day: A day to invoke satan and the antichrist
- Technocracy: The system of control that makes reality engineering possible on a global scale
Who will be the spokesperson for this new world religion? To answer this question, Veith quoted Robert Muller, a former UN Assistant Secretary-General who was referred to as the UN’s “Philosopher” and “Prophet of Hope,” and “father of global education”:
timestamp 011808
“The Pope will … speak for all religions.” Really?! The Roman Catholic Pope? The man who heads the Roman Catholic Church, whose insiders control the “ancient mystery religions,” including Islam? Is the Vatican dictating to the UN, or is the UN dictating to the Vatican? We don’t know. But it signifies that the Vatican is collaborating with the UN and the two organisations’ religious outlooks align. And as Bailey stated, the universal religion they aim to impose is not Judaism nor Christianity.
Not only is the UN collaborating with the Vatican, but, as we noted in a previous article, the UN’s agency UNRWA has long been operating as the de facto government in Gaza. For the UN to operate to this extent in Gaza, they are collaborating with Hamas.
Read more: George Soros, the United Nations and groups organising pro-Hamas protests
Using the information above, let’s connect the dots to circle back to the beginning of this article: The Vatican controls Islam; the Vatican collaborates with the UN; the UN collaborates with Hamas; and, Hamas, through its links to Islam, is ultimately controlled by the Vatican.
It’s not surprising, then, that Greta Thunberg, who is the UN’s poster girl for its climate change agenda, collaborated with Hamas in a publicity stunt to “free Palestine.” Essentially, it is a case of one UN representative working alongside another to further the UN/Vatican’s goals.
Note: A theory we haven’t delved into above is whether the Muslim Brotherhood is working for intelligence agencies. In part 11 of ‘Total Onslaught’ (timestamp 57:53), Veith quoted a book written in 1960 which stated the Knights of the Military Order of Malta not only control the banking, industry and military complexes of the world but they also rule the international intelligence community – the KGB in the East and the CIA in the West. And as it is the Jesuits who control the Knights of Malta, it is ultimately the Jesuits who control the intelligence agencies. The Jesuits, also known as the Society of Jesus, is a religious order within the Catholic Church.
Read more: How much influence does MI6 have in world events and who do they answer to?
Featured image: The Freedom Flotilla Coalition activists on board the yacht named Madleen bound for Gaza. Please note: There appears to be little or no room for “aid” on board. Source: Sky News
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
Who controls the Muslim Brotherhood?
The Muslim Brotherhood’s only aim is to control the world through Islam.
OH, REALLY ?…
Rabbi Ari Shishler: Our Goal As Jewish People For The Last 3300 Years Since The Revelation At Sinai Has Been To Control The Worldhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIs1oCJWiRs
Rabbi Yom Tov Glaser: HOW THE JEWS CREATED CATHOLICISM
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RCehr7bCIF4z/
THE ARAMAIC LANGUAGE OF THE QUR’AN
https://aramaicquran.wordpress.com/2012/03/28/the-aramaic-language-of-the-quran/
ARAMAIC is the language that JESUS spoke.
The word TORAH is mentioned 18 times in the QUR’AN in 16 verses.
JESUS is the most mentioned person in the QUR’AN by reference; 25 times by the name ISA, third-person 48 times, first-person 35 times, and the rest as titles and attributes.
THE TORAH AND THE GOSPEL ARE INTEGRAL TO THE QUR’AN.
RABBI ADMITS: ISLAM IS ISRAEL’S BROOM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6Ivk_043pM
RABBIS FANTASIZE ABOUT THE DESTRUCTION OF WESTERN CIVILISATIONhttps://www.bitchute.com/video/x8GSINJuRZTb/
Ah yes, the Elephant in the room, well said, it always has been and it always will be “Them”
Thanks, Anton Cardew,
It’s getting and harder to mention the Elephant in the room and it is only a matter of time before it becomes a criminal offence. No wonder that the people are “reluctant” to mention the Elephant in the room.
U.S. Congress passes bill laying groundwork to CRIMINALIZE all criticism of Zionism, Israel or Jews in any context whatsoever, even with FACTS
https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-05-congress-passes-bill-criminalizing-criticism-zionism-israel.html
As Voltaire said: “To find out who rules over you find out who you are not allowed to criticise.”
Of course, the “fact checkers” and “historical evidence suggest” that Voltaire never wrote or uttered this specific phrase. Whoever said it, was spot on.
Thanks for bringing Walter Veith’s work to the attention of the world. I am not a 7th Day Adventist but I started listening to him over 10 years’ ago because I am very anti-Catholic. The SDA’s do excellent research on the evils of Popery, the Vatican and their connection to world powers.
I lived near New Orleans and always wondered why the Islamic crescent moon was a symbol on their police cars. Also, as a child I noticed at every holiday parade, the Shriners, that high level masonry sect wore fezes with large tassels.
I believe the Islamic religion is the secret weapon of globalists and will be used to overwhelm especially Christians in the end times.
I just read a Substack article put out by Rurik Skywalker, a young Russian blogger who is now reporting that huge numbers of Muslims are beiing imported into Russia and actually blocked a major freeway the other while praying. Meanwhile the Orthodox Christian church is beiing denied all marches. BTW, the idea that Russia is the US’ “enemy” is pure Kabuki theater
It is a shame Walter Veith can’t see the truth regarding the Lord’s Day (Christian Sabbath) and through much else the SDA are so wrong on, such as food and drink… Oh and they revere Ellen G. White as a prophetess!
I like his stance on the KJV1611 and much else, also he is a very good speaker.
Regarding the evil powers that be we read about in the above article, it is enough to know that the rulers of the darkness of this world are the spiritual wickedness in high places. Ephesians 6:12.
The KJV1611 has high as opposed to heavenly as it is rendered in all modern translations. Why is this important? Satan has been ejected from heaven! He is now the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience. Ephesians 2:2.
And who would deny that evil isn’t rife in the high places; governments and kingdoms etc.? They are not in heaven!
I agree with the commentator regarding definitive facts are difficult to find; “The truth is sometimes hard to tell. The stories the family weave are hard to distinguish from the truth. Myths are one of their best weapons, and a researcher must be wary.”
Very interesting article, Rhoda.
Hi Islander, you say “Very interesting article, Rhoda.” Thank you.
This talking about muslims is now the same as talking about the j. The victim countries are not muslim countries nor are they j. Both those groups should have no say in those countries. Both should go back to their own countries. How many Christian Brotherhoods are there in muslim or j countries? How many Christian churches and cathedrals? How many mosques and s’s are there in Christian countries? How many people have been raped and murdered in muslim and j countries by Christians? How many have been raped and murdered in Christian countries by muslims and js? Who do you think runs your country?
Hi Kelly, the Muslim Brotherhood are Islamists. An Islamist is not the same as a Muslim. Yes, Islamism/Islamists recruit young Muslim men but that doesn’t make the two synonymous.
As for the anti-Jewish rhetoric: I will guarantee at least 70% of what you’ve read or heard about Jews in recent years is from the anti-Jew lobby, most of whom are people pushing the Globalists’ agenda, neo-Nazis, Islamists or Muslims (and some others, particularly on the hard and far left of politics) who are being radicalised. In other words, it is propaganda – some of it poorly done and easy to spot.
In recent years anti-Jewish rhetoric ramped up when Russia invaded Ukraine (I guessed this was neo-Nazis in Ukraine and their supporters getting stuck in, or perhaps Russia using reverse psychology on Western populations to make them turn against Ukraine), it then quietened down until Hamas’s terrorist attack on Israel after which it ramped up to even higher levels. It then notably suddenly quietened down again after Israel destroyed Hamas’ command centre in Gaza, which doesn’t mean it all came from Hamas but indicates that other Islamist propagandists such as Islamic State in Iran either got pre-occupied or warned off at around the same time. My guess is that now, the majority of the much lower levels of anti-Jewish propaganda is coming from far-left activists or Islamist activists outside the Middle East (e.g. Islamists who are living in Western countries or so-called “pro-Palestinian” activists).
If people fall for the anti-Jewish PsyOp then they will use it over and over again to deflect attention and blame (There’s a classic example of redirecting people’s attention onto Jews to deflect negative attention away from the Muslim Brotherhood in Han’s comment above yours, it’s an amateurish attempt so I’m guessing Han is a low level activist). So let’s not fall for it.
And Christianity is NOT Catholicism . Real Christians were exterminated in the west by the Vatican(Catholics) . The Cathars , Albigenses . In the east the Manicheans , were exterminated . When the last Manichean priest died in China it was immediately reported to the British consulate in the 1800s.
Amen to that! The Catholic cult gives Christianity a bad name
You’re DEAD RIGHT there!
When I first believed, I couldn’t figure out why they kept Him hanging on their crucifixes for all to see.
It is written: He is not here, for He is risen. Matthew 28:6.
Risen indeed. Luke 24:34!
I could be here all night expounding the evils of popery-thankfully you are WIDE awake to them!
Sorry, don’t know where you get your “history”, BUT real Christians were not and have not been “exterminated”.
YES, such is the purpose of j000 created catholicism. However, IF you knew how to read scripture and understand it you would know that the “church age” has now come to a close. There are still a few real Christians, but they are scattered.
You have accepted and embraced catholic/j000/masonic embellished history.
Dear Rhoda Wilson,
“We are being Censored. Please share the Facts the Mainstream Media refuse to…”
If you don’t like being Censored, why then do YOU Censor the comments of some of your readers, like me, sharing “the Facts the Mainstream Media refuse to” publish ?…
Why did you Censor my replies to kelly and you, if I may ask ?
Is there anything in my replies to kelly and you that is NOT FACTUAL ?
I guess you are NO different at all from those you are accusing of CENSORSHIP and YOURSELF.
Anything NOT fitting YOUR narrative YOU will not publish, RIGHT ?
Very disappointing. Yes, there is absolutely no difference between the Mainstream Media and the “so-called” Mainstream Alternative Media with THE EXPOSE a shining example
of CONTROLLED OPPOSITION.
Kind regards,
Han
Han, two of your comments were flagged by a spam filter as requiring approval. One of them I did not approve because it was the length of an article and because you were having a jibe at me. To avoid such comments being deleted, keep your comments to comment length and discuss/debate topics, hopefully as raised in the article you are commenting under.
I did not approve the second of your comments because, for no apparent reason, you were having a jibe at another commentator and spreading yet more anti-Jewish rhetoric.
Yet, your comments being blocked has not stopped you from trolling and you have now posted a third comment which is similar in nature. The only reason why your comment above has remained, is so that others who read this have some insight into the “personality” that is behind the profile named “Han” who, in the first comment posted, tried to divert negative attention away from the Muslim Brotherhood by accusing the Jews. This is typical of Islamic ideologues.
You are an activist, that is clear, and I suspect you haven’t read the article you are commenting under, you were simply triggered to start trolling because Islamism (in the form of the Muslim Brotherhood) was discussed in a context which did not glorify it, or make Islamists out as innocent victims of e.g. the West, as you would wish. Through your comments that remain under this article, others will gain insight into why and, perhaps to a small degree how, Islamic activists spread anti-Jewish rhetoric with the hopes of recruiting others to their cause.
I’ll end with this: If you keep trolling The Expose, me or any other users of this site, and/or keep coming onto this site to simply leave anti-Jewish rhetoric, then your comments will be deleted – yes, you, “Han,” will be “censored” on our site, either by the site’s spam bot, by me or by anyone else at The Expose.
Dear Rhoda Wilson,
You write: “Through your comments that remain under this article, others will gain insight into why and, perhaps to a small degree how, Islamic activists spread anti-Jewish rhetoric with the hopes of recruiting others to their cause.“
My response: I am certainly not an Islamic activist. The Bible lessons at Primary and High School made me a Atheist when I was 13 years old.
I detest Judaism, which created Christianity and Islam, the Abrahamic religions, and now half the world’s population, Christians and Muslims are worshipping Mr. Yahweh, the Jewish Psycho Genocidal God.
1 Samuel 15:3 – “Now go and completely destroy the Amalekite nation – men, women, children, babies, cattle, sheep, goats, camels and donkeys.”
Remember Netanyahu calling the Palestinians “Amalek” and so justifying the genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza?
I was so pro-Jewish that I wanted to fight for Israel in the Six Day War in 1967.
However, my Jewish blinkers came off after that War and I became pro-Palestinian. I have not stopped reading about Israel and its history since then.
History, European history in particular, has always been my favourite subject.
I get 80 to 90% of my info on Jews, Israel, Zionism, etc., from JEWISH SOURCES, so, please, don’t accuse me of “spreading anti-Jewish rhetoric”.
Here another Jewish source:
JACOB ROTHSCHILD Speaks: My Family Created Israel: https://youtu.be/GnU4NLDF1LU
Kind regards,
Han
Han, you are an activist. Here’s another example of your blatant Islamic activism: “I get 80 to 90% of my info on Jews, Israel, Zionism, etc., from JEWISH SOURCES … JACOB ROTHSCHILD”. I note the use of capital letters to emphasise, a psychological trick commonly used by propagandists to make slogans/mantras stick in people’s minds – but this is not my main point.
Using Jacob Rothschild as one of your “JEWISH SOURCES” is propaganda. There are two ideologies that would use/disseminate the lie that “JACOB ROTHSCHILD” is a “JEWISH SOURCE” – Nazism (or now neo-Nazism) and Islamism. Since you were triggered to protect Islamism and you label yourself as “pro-Palestinian” which is an Islamic (Muslim Brotherhood) run operation, that signifies you are an Islamist or Islamic activist rather than a neo-Nazi or a neo-Nazi activist.
Yes, you can believe Rothschild’s lies, that he was an Ashkenazi Jew (a Jewish convert), if it suits your narrative but for anyone who has done some research and is being honest, they know that Jacob Rothschild was not Jewish, he was luciferian. If you don’t know the difference between Judaism and luciferianism (satanism) then I suggest you change where you are getting your information from, and, for your sake, the sooner the better because as, Walter Veith’s lecture in the article above demonstrates, Islam is one of lucifer’s ploys to deceive the many who choose to follow it.
Dear Rhoda Wilson,
You write: “Using Jacob Rothschild as one of your “JEWISH SOURCES” is propaganda.”
My response: Oh, really ?… Propaganda ?…
Rothschild family – Wealthy Ashkenazi Jewish noble banking family originally from Frankfurt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family
You write: “Han, you are an activist. Here’s another example of your blatant Islamic activism: …”
My response: As an Atheist I don’t care one bit about the Abrahamic religions; the scourge of Humanity.
The sooner we can get rid of them the better for Humanity.
WHO CREATED THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ?
The use of Islamic terrorism for the political ends of Western nations is nothing new.
After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in 1924, the British and Americans stepped in to fill the vacuum by providing their own versions of “Islamic” leaders.
This started with the creation of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was created through a grant from the British.
Under British sponsorship, the Brotherhood flourished, and today represents a sizeable and powerful force in the Islamic world, but most worryingly, as the institution behind almost every act of terror in the name of Islam.
And beginning in 1967 through the late 1980s, ISRAEL helped the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD establish itself in the occupied territories. It assisted Ahmed Yassin, the leader of the Brotherhood, in creating HAMAS, betting that its Islamist character would weaken the PLO.
WHO CREATED AL QAEDA AND ISIS ? America’s CIA & Israel’s Mossad
That is why Israel has never been attacked by Al Qaeda or ISIS.
Who is more dangerous to the people of the world: The Muslim Brotherhood or The World Economic Forum (WEF) and its Great Reset ?
The Agenda: Their Vision. Your Future (2025) | Official Trailer – 3 minutes.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/39YTzsgaw30G/
The Agenda: Their Vision – Your Future (2025) | Full Documentary (4K)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFHHOBiUrkg
Klaus Schwab, the founder of the WEF, is Jewish.
Schwab is recorded as a Jewish family name with Nathan Schwab of Frankfurt am Main in 1590; Chouabe and Chevaube in 1614; Schvaub in 1670; Schwabe in 1715; and Schowabe in 1720.
Distinguished bearers of the Jewish family name Schwab include the French scholar and librarian, Moise Schwab (1839-1918), and the 19th/20th century American physician, Sidney Isaac Schwab. – 253292 ID Number: Written by researchers of the ANU Museum of the Jewish People in Tel Aviv
https://dbs.anumuseum.org.il/skn/en/c6/e253292/Family_Name/SCHWAB
Kind regards,
Han
Hi Han,
This video with Catherine Austin Fitts, is well worth watching.
Keep up your good work.
Thanks Dave,
The video is certainly well worth watching and Catherine Austin Fitts is a very brave woman and knows what she is talking about.
Rhoda,
There’s a lot going on here!
As for this censorship card being played against The Expose; I remember in the dim and distant past, before this quickfire social media age (or should I say rage), there was such a thing as a “local rag” as well as the national broadsheets/tabloids.
I think its been ten years or more since I purchased a printed newspaper.
As and when, I would write my views on the topic of the day to the editor (there was a “Letters to the Editor” column, or two, or more; mostly they would be printed in full, sometimes edited, oftentimes they weren’t published at all-when this happened I never considered I was being censored, I just accepted the editor’s decision as final! Wasn’t this always the editor’s prerogative?
But times have changed, much for the worse…
Hi Islander, I hear you. But there is no doubt that Han is an activist, and he has all the hallmarks of an Islamic activist (not a Muslim activist, an Islamic activist). Activists always revert to accusations such as “censorship.” Another tactic they frequently use is to make personal attacks, by that I mean using words. It’s what they are trained to do – target the person not the message.
I understand that well.
I’m also an “activist”. An activist for Christ.
Hi Islander, the difference between Christian activism and Islamic activism is love. Christians are taught to love. Islamists are taught to be “anti” – anti-West, anti-Jewish, anti-Israel and so on. Islamism is an ideology that encourages, demands even, strife, anger and hate, and sometimes violence and death.
Hi Islander,
You write: “I’m also an “activist”. An activist for Christ.”
My response:
Matthew 15:24 – Then Jesus said to the woman: “I was sent only to help God’s lost sheep – the people of Israel.”
Jesus Christ in Matthew 10:34
“Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.”
Exodus 15
The Lord is a man of war: the Lord is his name
Jeremiah 51:20-24
“You are my battle-axe and sword”, says the LORD.
“With you I will shatter nations and destroy many kingdoms. With you I will shatter armies -destroying the horse and rider, the chariot and charioteer. With you I will shatter men and women, old people and children, young men and young women.”
I wonder how many Christians actually read their Bible, written by the Jews ?
I did and became an Atheist.
CHRISTIANITY: THE GREAT JEWISH HOAX – by Thomas Dalton, PhD
AT 2.1 billion people, Christianity is the largest religion on Earth. And yet, not a fraction of a percent of these people understand even the basic facts of their own so-called religion.
If they did, they would be utterly appalled. Their entire religion is a fraud; it is based in Jewish lies and Jewish duplicity to an extent that is astonishing.
https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/08/christianity-the-great-jewish-hoax/
ABRAHAM, Jacob, Moses, King David, and King Solomon in all his splendour, never existed. The Israelite exile in Egypt, the Exodus and the Israelite conquest of the Promised Land never took place, a 15-year study of archaeological evidence has concluded.
The Old Testament stories in the Bible are FICTION.
The study – by Professor Thomas Thompson, one of the world’s foremost authorities on biblical archaeology – says that the first 10 books of the Old Testament are almost certainly fiction, written between 500 and 1,500 years after the events they purport to describe.
Professor Thompson: “It is out of the question that Saul, David, and Solomon, as described as kings in the Bible, could have existed. I think the biblical accounts are wonderful stories, invented at the time when Jerusalem was part of the Persian Empire in the 5th Century BC.”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/leading-archaeologist-says-old-testament-storeis-are-fiction-1500431.html
The Scriptures affirm Satan’s misuse of the Holy Oracles (Matthew 4:6).
As for me, I won’t be tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive. Ephesians 4:14.
Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience. Ephesians 5:6.
But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived. 2 Timothy 3:13.
Hi Islander, thank you for your reply.
You write: The Scriptures affirm Satan’s misuse of the Holy Oracles (Matthew 4:6).
My response: Always blaming Satan for the wrong things in this world.
God doesn’t exist, nor does Satan. Jesus Christ and Mohammed never existed. All Jewish Fairy Tales.
The Jew Marcus Eli Ravage author of ‘A Real Case Against the Jews’ published in Century Magazine, 1928: Full text: https://archive.org/details/2018-real-case-against-the-jews-a-marcus-eli-ravage/page/8/mode/2up
“Our Kings, our statesmen, our prophets, our warriors are your heroes. Our ancient little country is your Holy Land. Our national literature is your Holy Bible. What our people thought and taught has become inextricable woven into your very speech and tradition, until no one among you can be called educated who is not familiar with our racial heritage.
No conquest in history can even remotely compare with this clean sweep of our conquest over you.”
Christianity was a clever Jewish ploy to bring the Goyim, non-Jews, worldwide under the Jewish spell of Abraham, Moses, Jesus Christ and above all: The Fear Of God. That is the Jewish god, the genocidal Mr. Yahweh, worshipped by Christians and Muslims.
The Jews created Christianity, Islam and Communism to conquer the world and succeeded beyond their wildest expectations. They wrote the Torah/Bible, The Qur’an and The Communist Manifesto.
What is incredible about the Bible is not its “Divine authorship”; it is that such a concoction of contradictory nonsense could be believed by anyone to have been written by an omniscient God and that such obvious nonsense is offered as being “Divine Truth”.
Seeing God:
Jesus vs God:
Last words of Jesus:
“ It is necessary to be a 32nd Degree Mason for six months before being eligible to join the Shrine.” not true. I always enjoy reading about Masonry from people that are not masons. As a 3rd degree master mason, I can tell you I am eligible to join the shrine. I have been asked several times. And I can assure you there is no Koran in any AR shrine building.
And Catholics don’t become Masons. They can be excommunicated from the church for doing so. I have seen it. They are supposed to join the Knights of Columbus.
Fraternal orders. You can deduce this by reading 33 degree Albert Pike when he speaks of manufacturing a war between Christians and Muslims, with the objective that they mutually destroy each other and they can force a one world religion.
Not surprising by any stretch, the churches are part of the covenant. There isn’t any left vs right, just two sides that agreed to work together and keep the people as the enemy. Then, their crooked system can continue at the expense of the same people. This is synonymous with a farming ‘pen’ where the ‘food’ is kept. A pen is also a ‘wall’ and politicians all worship the ‘western wall’ because they abuse those populations. This same trend can be seen all the way back to Sumeria, when the ‘5th house’ was added.
They now expect our families to willingly die in a manufactured war so that they can stay in power and keep the same crooked human oppression system running.
They expect us to accept a police state, micro-managed life, sterilization, brain implants and zero chance of ever rising as a family because it keeps them living their lifestyles.
Every death they cause is a murder because it’s all premeditated.
Germany in the 1930’s was very opposed to secret societies & communism <<and their origins>>.
[…] What is the Muslim Brotherhood? […]
Lots of very wingy and wild speculation in this one. Although the Muslim Brotherhood was founded in Egypt in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna, some ten years later it was militarized by the Brits and from that time was used for various terror operations serving Western interests. After the Rothschild-directed, US-UK-Israeli triumvirate began the bloody war in Syria in 2011, it became more and more evident that whether or not the Brotherhood was actually advancing Islam in the world, it was used by the same triumvirate powers to radicalize, recruit, train, arm and deploy young Muslims for a host of terrorist organizations including Al Qaeda, IS, ISIL and ISIS for their terror and destabilization operations, not just in the Levant, but also in Afghanistan, and as far away as in the Philippines.
As a result of Yalta and Potsdam in 1945, the Rothschild-controlled West, led by the US and the UK, ceded the control of most of Protestant and Catholic eastern Europe to the Rothschild-controlled USSR. Meanwhile, the Vatican by virtue of the mainly-US occupation of Italy and western Europe further lost a great deal of its international influence. Based on the historical antipathy between the Catholic Church and its arch foes of Freemasonry and the Rothschild-promoted, global communist movement, the Vatican after WWII was not in a very good bargaining position with those secular forces wanting essentially either to wipe out the religion or the commandeer it in some more sophisticated manner, than using the more direct Soviet methods of suppression.
When connecting the big dots of history it is very difficult to see that the “selection” of the liberal, Pope John XXIII, in 1958, as well as much of the politicking of Vatican II during the 1960’s to “update” the religion more to worldly ways, was not mainly due to such very powerful external influences. And yes, most certainly, in the Masonic and Rothschild corruption processes the Vatical became one of their tools for a “New World Order” one-world government and one-world religion – to make us “safe” just like with the Covid vaccines.
Fortunately for many of us, the current reforms taking place in the RC Church today are running counter to those external controls, and there is a very strong current towards more traditional norms – returning to the primacy and centrality of the person of Jesus Christ.
Hi Fred B, as soon as you have proof of Rothschilds’ involvement, you have to suspect Illuminati involvement (depending which Rothschild you are referring to) and, if so, then you know you’re looking at an operation being carried out by the fourth level from the top of the global structure. I suspect (but don’t know) the Jesuits are below one level, on the same level as the Freemasons. I’ll explain why.
“Todd made clear the Rothschilds … are at the top of the Illuminati hierarchy”
https://expose-news.com/2022/10/14/todd-warned-about-plan-world-take-over/
“The Illuminati was founded by Adam Weishaupt in Bavaria, now in Germany, on 1 May 1776. Weishaupt sought to cast aside organised religion in favour of a new form of “illumination” through reason. He drew upon ideas expressed by the Jesuits, the Mysteries of the Seven Sages of Memphis, the Kabbalah and the Freemasons. He recruited heavily from the latter group, infiltrating masonic lodges in his quest to recruit some of the wealthiest and most influential men in Europe.”
Some claim Weishaupt was a Jesuit, some claim he was a Jesuit Priest and others say he was Jesuit educated but wasn’t a Jesuit and was, in fact, pathologically hostile toward the Jesuits . At any one time it’s not possible to know whether the Illuminati and the Jesuits are trying to kill each other or are working together.
https://expose-news.com/2023/01/30/illuminati-freemasons-rosicrucians-and-jesuits/
Also when we can evidence involvement of the Rothschilds, we can suspect it is an operation coming from higher up (depending which Rothschild you are referring to). According to John Coleman’s research, the Rothschilds have a representative on the Committee of 300, a Committee which also includes the Black Nobility, also known as the Venetian Nobility.
https://expose-news.com/2023/05/08/black-nobility-new-world-order-and-the-great-reset-king/
For an understanding how all these seemingly separate groups fit together, even though at times they appear at odds with each other, and the hierarchy within their structure, watch Gary Wayne’s video embedded in the article below (beginning at 55:33). The hierarchy he explains, working from the bottom up, is:
5. Plethora of secret societies including the Freemasons: At the 33rd Degree Freemasons become “enlightened” or “illuminated”. (The Jesuits also are associated with “Enlightenment” thought, so perhaps it is not only through Freemasonry that someone can progress, i.e. there is more than one route to become “illuminated” and progress up to the next level e.g. through the Jesuits.)
4. Illuminati: The Illuminati grafts the illuminated Freemasons into their society.
3. Rosicrucians: Rosicrucians graft members of the Illuminati that have Noble bloodlines (Venetian Black Nobility?) into their society.
2. Council of 300 (aka Committee of 300?)
1. 13 families: Above the council of 300 is the 13 families that come from the “pure” (Nephilim) bloodlines who have 3 anti-Christ figures (an heir and two spares, so to speak) to rule the world that is under a One World Government, raised from childhood for this purpose, ready to be released into the world at any time just in case the opportunity arises.
https://expose-news.com/2023/12/24/the-babylon-conspiracy-two-angles/
Who are the 13 families that have “pure” bloodlines? Below is Fritz Springmeier’s list, although it would be good to see what other researcher’s say because he includes the Rothschilds which, in my mind, is not correct. The Rothschilds can’t be a “pure” bloodline as, although they did have some members who married into Nobility, they are not from Nobility so their bloodline can’t be “pure.” To keep their bloodlines “pure” the 13 families, which descend from ancient kings (going back to Nimrod), would marry (or at least procreate) among themselves, surely?
https://archive.org/details/who-are-illuminati-and-what-are-the-illuminatis-13-bloodline-families
Although I am not familiar with much of what you say, the article I published may be describing the same things you are referring to but at a higher level in their hierarchy.
Thank you for all of the information. Very likely I refer too much to the Rothschild dynasty as being at the top of the heap, but we do have the ownership problem of the West which appears to be quite ethnically disproportionate, together with a ruthless money power behind the scenes. Whomever has the most of it (money) no doubt is most powerful and ought to be most responsible when things go wrong. Of course there is “old money” going back likely to Roman times with Swiss banks holding the fortunes of the various controlling families, all of whom keep a very low profile it would seen, and likely do not mind the Jews taking most of the heat. As for military power being a rival to the money power, it is said that all wars are bankers wars.
As a former RC seminarian way back some 50 years ago for about 5 years, and as an ardent person of that faith, I do know something about RC Church politics. The war within, at the time and ever since, has been between the liberals (or progressives”) and the conservatives. The external conflict was usually over the efforts of the left to water down faith and morals of the Church to make the Church more in conformity to the mores of the times and for ecumenical unity, and if not an actual unity regarding major beliefs, then at least to give up many of the major differences separating the various creeds (which, incidentally, seems absurd if your religion is essentially based on a creed). The problem is that so-called “progressive” direction was mainly being honed and directed to unmake the Catholic faith mainly to serve the pottage of universal DEI globalist ends, with a greater concentration of power and wealth into the hands of the ruling money power and the owners of most of global assets.
It is said that the revolutionary Second Vatican Council of the 1960’s in opening the windows to air out a rather stuffy and rigid Church, also let in a lot of pollution, which was certainly the case in what followed regarding faith and morals in some of its examples and in some of its teachings. I do not know how influential the Jesuits or the entire RC Church is in the geopolitical power politics of today with, numerous nations being destabilized, invaded, robbed, and carved up, and even in some cases the people being exterminated, but I tend to think they have little to do with those evils, either on the left or the right. Rather, it is the absence of any particular moral condemnation which indicates a vulnerability and a fear.
However, regarding the more pragmatic and political Jesuits, it would seem that those on the left in that order have had few qualms in evoking the principle that “the ends justify the means”, and have gone along with the international banking cartel, and majority-asset owners on the planet to usher in the UN Agendas, for a New World Order. In doing so they are in the very least accomplices to the evil methods utilized, which include the massive global-warming and climate-change frauds, as well as to aiding and abetting the heinous Covid plandemic and the many crimes against humanity used to carry it out.
Although, the hands of the Vatican and the Jesuits, in my view, are not as dirty as the actual planners, agencies, organizations which did the Covid wet work, the Vatican, the international banking cartel, and the British Crown, in their complicity were willing enablers. The financing of the Covid operation had to be governed by the international banking cartel. As for the moral aspect, there was not one peep, protest, or condemnation, from the heads of any major religious organization – despite the fact that a harmful US bioweapon virus had been deliberately released in populated centers all around the globe, and despite the fact that its lethality was designed to kill a few million very vulnerable people, and the additional fact that the actual death numbers and the ones they fabricated created, were deliberately used to terrorize us into submission. There was absolutely no need for the massive lockdowns, or the toxic, so-called “experimental”, money-making vaccines which, in any case have killed far more people than the Covid virus to date, and which keep on destroying the lives of young and old alike.
I have always been of the view that Pope Benedict most likely retired from his papal office in 2013 in order to make way for the very pragmatic Jesuit head, Cardinal Bergoglio, to become Pope Francis, in order to help lead the world into the long-planed UN-Agenda, totalitarian, nation-deconstructing, open-border NWO. Francis was given the honor of inaugurating UN Agenda 2030 in NYC in September of 2015, and based on the more spiritual and conservative Catholic direction Benedict took since becoming Pope in 2005, and the fact that he had no ill-health reasons to induce him to retire, I have had to conclude that he was personally unwilling to aid and abet in the methods being employed to usher in the NWO or for the actual totalitarian ends being sought. However, I also believe that at the time there were enormous external threats from money-power sources to bankrupt the Church or seriously harm it for its non compliance.
The few of us who have investigated the entire Covid pandemic since it began in 2019, have no qualms in calling it a “Plandemic”. The planning went back before 2010 and the Vatican would have been aware of it and the reasons for it.
Hi Fred B, you say, “We do have the ownership problem of the West which appears to be quite ethnically disproportionate.” If you have been trained to search for something you will find it – i.e. if you have been trained to search for a specific ethnicity in everything and you look hard enough, you will find what you’re looking for.
How do they train you what to look for? Through repeated messaging., through mantras, through memes etc. It’s called a PsyOp.
If you’re looking a specific ethnicity to identify them then you are on the wrong track. People from all ethnicities, religions etc have been recruited to their cause. The only people that could be mistaken as a Jew that has any influence and is in their number is the Rothschilds. And even then, the people who are searching for a specific ethnicity in everything (much like the Black Lives Matter movement, which is no coincidence) get basic information about the Rothschilds wrong, and I would say purposefully wrong because the correct information is not hard to find.
Firstly, they continuously push out that Jacob Rothschild was the head of the Global Rothschild family. He was not. He was only head of the British Rothschilds. The people who use identity politics to label people completely and deliberately, in my mind, ignore the head of the Global Rothschild empire who is the man who is pulling the strings. Why is that? Could it be because of Rothschilds families’ internal politics, a family spat? Jacob Rothschild was in a power struggle about 20 years ago to keep control of the Rothschilds’ global empire, he lost that power struggle, but perhaps that’s why the Rothschilds would offer Jacob to the world as a target, they have never forgiven him or see him as threat to the new head of the Global Rothschild operations? If so, then who is ultimately driving the anti-Jacob Rothschild narrative?
Second, when they erroneously target Jacob Rothschild, they always use him as an example to hate all Jews, even though Jacob Rothschild was a luciferian not a Jew. The identity politics fanatics then use Jacob Rothschild to train others to become Jew hunters, to look for Jews in every place, every situation (much like Black Lives Matter, and it is no coincidence).
So you see, those that rely on identity politics to identify who to target (much like Black Lives Matter) are not telling the truth – it is a PsyOp.
If you want to know who is controlling things, start by researching the Venetian Black Nobles. The Rothschilds are not Black Nobles, some members of their family have married into Nobility at some point, I’m not sure if its Black Nobility, but the Rothschilds are not of the pure Noble bloodline, so the Rothschilds will always be subject to the Black Nobles. I’m not sure if I’m correct to view it this way, but I tend to view the Rothschilds as the Black Nobles’ banker. That doesn’t mean the Rothschilds don’t have significant influence, and guilty of many crimes, but it does mean that they are not at the top of the pile. And if, as Jacob Rothschild was, the other heads of the Rothschild families are luciferians (satanists), then they will follow that hierarchy of being subject to the Black Nobles because it is their religion, it is from the Nobles that their anti-Christ, their ruler of the world, will rise. So there will be a worship-like attitude, like worshipping a god, towards the 13 families and their anti-Christ.
Rhoda, when you write “..that their anti-Christ, their ruler of the world, will rise.” Do you mean the biblical antichrist, the coming ruler of the world?
Hi Islander, Yes, sorry, reading it back I can see how it could have been misinterpreted because of the words I used.
What the 13 families, their secret societies beneath them and those that follow satanism would deem their saviour (I guessing as I’m not sure what they refer to him as, possibly they refer to him as the “Sangreal World King” that Dean Henderson talks about?), is what Christians refer to as the anti-Christ as foretold/forewarned in the Bible.
For anyone who isn’t familiar with the anti-Christ and the false prophet as the Bible has forewarned, the article below has collected some verses that make mention of them.
https://www.bibleuniverse.com/articles/the-anti-christ-daniel-7-and-revelation-13
For anyone who feels afraid, read Psalm 23 and then read Matthew 6:9-13.
https://biblehub.com/kjv/psalms/23.htm
https://biblehub.com/kjv/matthew/6.htm
Rhoda, you refer to “the global Rothschild family”; do you know of any one particular Rothschild with a peculiar Greek heritage?
Hi Islander, nope. Do you have a particular Rothschild in mind? If so, who were you thinking of?
If you’re speaking generally … I’ve only heard about the five branches of the Rothschild family that together make up the global Rothschild empire: the English, French, Italian, German/Austrian and Eastern European families (I think I’ve got the five branches right, but easy enough for anyone to look up to check) – any one of them could have Greek heritage in their number, as they could have any other ethnic group. Remember that the Rothschilds have married into European Nobility over the centuries to further their influence – so some of them are of mixed Noble heritage. How many Rothschilds are descended from European Nobility as a result of marrying into Nobility? Your guess is as good as mine.
Also remember that even the Rothschilds have never claimed to be Hebrew/Israelite. We know this because they hide behind the cover of calling themselves Ashkenazi Jews (non-Israelite/Hebrew Jewish converts). So when we refer to mixed heritage it is Greek/German/French/Italian (and/or any number of ethnicities) and Khazarian (as some researchers say the Rothschilds originally were) or more likely, over the centuries, a mixed Khazarian ethnicity. Khazars (which inhabited what is today called Ukraine and bits of Russia) originally came from the Turkey/Iran region, I think but best confirm that as I may not be recalling correctly. So, if Turkey/Iran region is correct, the Rothschilds are a mixture of Turkish/Iranian and any of several ethnicities depending who they intermarried with over the centuries. We should probably note that when we think of Iran in pre-Khazar days, they were likely Persians, not Arabs.
For readers who haven’t heard of the Khazars, here’s a few articles to wet your appetite:
1. Leuren Moret: Ancient Iranian bloodlines have controlled the world for 5,000 years
https://expose-news.com/2024/10/04/iranian-bloodlines-control-the-world/
2. Khazaria, Rothschild Dynasty, New World Order, Ukraine and Implementation of the Nephilim Agenda
https://expose-news.com/2022/04/04/khazaria-rothschilds-ukraine-and-nephilim-agenda/
3. Another resource that looks interesting: Khazars on Encyclopedia of Ukraine
Hello Rhoda,
Although the antichrist will be one man, I should have asked, do you know of a Greek branch of the “global Rothschild family”? Anyway, you have said pretty much that there is. I have long been aware of the vast wealth, influence and fame of the Rothschild dynasty, but only on the periphery, I haven’t studied their history anything like as much as you have. Hitherto, I had always considered the Rothschilds to be Jewish.
Biblically speaking, as you would know there are only two people groups; the Jews and non-Jews (Greek/Gentiles). Gentile is first mentioned in Matthew 4:15-it is not found in the OT, and literally means nations in the Greek.
The reason I am interested is because Antichrist must be of Greek origin, and the beast will rise up out of the sea (Revelation 13:1). This is the Mediterranean Sea/Great Sea contiguous with the Greek mainland and its islands.
B.W. Newton in his FACTS OF PROPHETIC SCRIPTURE on the coming antichrist in Revelation 13 writes;
v.1. “Beast”; the original signifies wild beast-the “little horn” of Daniel 7,8-whose dominions will bound this sea (the Mediterranean). Compare Daniel 7:2 with Numbers 34:6. Here, the horns are crowned, because they will be ruling under Antichrist (Rev 17:12), and the dominating systems will be atheistic, for “upon his heads are the names of blasphemy!” Note this beginning even now!
v.2. “Leopard”; the GRECIAN beast. Antichrist’s predominant characteristics will be Grecian-birth, appearance, intellect, culture-but he will combine all the evil characteristics of the other kingdoms: “feet of a bear”; the fierceness of the Persian: “mouth of a lion”; the gorgeousness of the Chaldean. He will also be energised by Satan, who will delegate his power to him.
Newton’s contemporary the renowned Bible scholar S.P. Tregelles (TREGELLES ON DANIEL p81) writes thus:
To this period (the rise of the coming Antichrist), then, the issue of this vision belongs ; a king rises from one of the four parts of that dominion which once was in the power of Alexander; his power extends in various directions, amongst others “towards the pleasant land; this of course means the land of Israel…
(Bold type- mine for emphasis).
It is a historical fact that after the death of Alexander the Great, four kingdoms were formed (that is the four notable ones, Daniel 8:8).
Cassander was given Macedon and Greece.
There many crazy theories about the biblical antichrist-some even think it is Trump!!!
Hi Islander, you say, “The reason I am interested is because Antichrist must be of Greek origin.” It could be, but remember Antichrist or anti-Christ is a word that Christians use. Luciferians, satanists etc will give him a different name. Essentially they mimic and twist the Biblical account. So what we call the anti-Christ is their equivalent/counterfeit of Jesus, what we call the false prophet is their equivalent/counterfeit of the Holy Spirit and what we call lucifer/satan is their equivalent/counterfeit of God. So my understanding is they mimic and warp the Trinity (which is God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit).
As for who is in line for the anti-Christ job and is alive today, it has to be one of the 13 families, descended from ancient kings (from the line of Cain rather than Seth, we should also consider whether, starting at a certain point in (pre)history, the maternal line is more important to them than the paternal line in proving their bloodline).
There are a few contenders if he were crowned today, including King Charles III. In the past, the British Royal family (Queen Victoria) has headed the Black Nobility (I’m not sure if that’s still the case). And from my own limited research into the ancestry of the British Royals, I feel pretty confident to say that the British Royal Family (at least until William dies, unless a minor royal is deemed of “pure” bloodline to take over) is one of the 13 families. So Charles III makes sense (although he is not charismatic or likeable enough, so perhaps that rules him out).
But the one most researchers think is the one who would be crowned in Jerusalem as their “King of the World” (which we call the anti-Christ) if the One World Government was in place today is the King of Spain, Philip. In other words, some researchers believe King Philip is the anti-Christ in waiting.
Watch: https://youtu.be/kNv_ziI-fWc
However, it doesn’t matter who it is because it will not be so. It will happen at a time God chooses and not at a time that satan chooses. And I believe that time is not in our lifetime – so King Philip, or any other anti-Christs in waiting alive today, will not be given the chance be crowned their “King of the World” in Jerusalem.
Hello Rhoda,
We are told more than once, in the 6th of Genesis, that it was man’s sin that was so great in the earth; that it was on account of man’s sin that the deluge came. But if the old Jewish and patristic theory, revived by Drs. Kitto and Maitland be true, then it was not man’s sin that wrought the evil, but the sin of angels. For it is clear that they were the guilty parties in this transaction, if they were parties at all.
Page 371; Horatius Bonar’s EARTHS MORNING.
Respectfully, I would suggest you read pages 369-376 of this book. It is an old book (1874) I have an original copy; it can be read on the INTERNET ARCHIVE for free, their pages 379-385.
Bonar goes on the write, “The Jewish rabbi’s were were the originators of the fable.” I agree.
No doubt Big Pharma and Big Tech are doing untold damage to the human race, but was human blood ever contaminated by angels? No.
Hi Islander, you say, “Was human blood ever contaminated by angels? No.”
I don’t know about fallen angels contaminating human blood. But did they contaminate the human DNA of certain bloodlines?
“There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” Genesis 6:4
https://biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/6.htm
If you don’t interpret Genesis 6:4 as as angels having offspring with human women, how do you interpret it?
There were giants before Noah’s flood (the Nephilim) and giants after after Noah’s flood (the Rephaim and the Anakim). Below are two of the mentions in the Bible of giants post-flood:
1. “And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.” Numbers 13:33
https://biblehub.com/numbers/13-33.htm
2. “For only Og king of Bashan remained of the remnant of giants; behold, his bedstead was a bedstead of iron; is it not in Rabbath of the children of Ammon? nine cubits was the length thereof, and four cubits the breadth of it, after the cubit of a man.” Deuteronomy 3:11
https://biblehub.com/deuteronomy/3-11.htm
One cubit (according to man’s measurement and not the cubic used by angels’ for measurement) is about 45cm. So, 9 cubits is about 4 metres (over 13 feet), and 4 cubits is about 1.8 metres (nearly 6 feet).
As for who commits sin applies to both fallen angels and man, each held accountable for their part. Satan and his host (fallen angels) will be punished for their sin and each and every man/woman will be judged as to whether they have committed sins against God and punished if God finds them guilty (but those who accept and follow Jesus as their saviour, and remain faithful to God, have their sins forgiven by Jesus’ blood shed on the cross so are not judged by God’s Law). We have proof of this from the beginning. Adam and Eve sinned against God’s commandments and so were evicted from the Garden of Eden as punishment. Satan and the angels who followed him sinned against God and were evicted from Heaven as punishment (we are told that a third of the angels followed satan, i.e. sinned against God, and were cast out of Heaven). So both humans and angels are punished if they sin against God, and they are only punished for the sins they themselves commit.
Rhoda,
You ask, “how do you interpret it”?
The “Sons of God” were the sons of Seth; that is of the godly lineage, read Genesis 5 which leads into chapter 6, there is NO other alternative!
The Lord God, Christ Himself said angels don’t procreate (Matthew 22:30), that is they have no wives. Yet according to the Jewish fable they took wives of all which they chose. Genesis 6:2.
Obviously you didn’t look up the INTERNET ARCHIVE on that book, yet you are a researcher?
All said, I have found in my life, thus far, that if you have a preconceived bias (including ‘researchers’), you’ll never read or examine the opposite viewpoint-much less believe it!
I’m not a giant, yet compared to many I am (I’m 6’5″), I lived in the Cotswold’s for some 40 years-I had to duck my head many a time, for the door lintels were barely 5′ high! Bibury, Minchinhampton, Stow, etc…
H Islander, you say, “Obviously you didn’t look up the INTERNET ARCHIVE on that book, yet you are a researcher?”
You are right, I haven’t yet as I am short of time. When I can find a few moments to spare, I will.
As for the “sons of God” mentioned in Genesis 6:4. I gather there are three theories:
1. The Sethite View (a view which you take).
2. The Kings of the Earth View (a view which neither of us take).
3. The Fallen Angel View (a view which I take). I take this view because in the Old Testament humans are referred to the “sons of man” and angels are referred to as the “sons of God.”
We can argue that each of these interpretations has its own strengths and challenges. But rather than us arguing about it, we can read about the different perspectives and make our own minds up (I’ve attached some discussions about the three view points below). And if we feel our salvation or our faith in God depends on getting it right (which I don’t believe is the case) then we can pray for wisdom.
https://equip.sbts.edu/article/who-are-the-sons-of-god-daughters-of-man-and-nephilim/
https://www.gotquestions.org/sons-of-God.html
https://davidschrock.com/2024/05/03/the-sons-of-god-three-interpretations-of-genesis-61-4/
https://www.equip.org/articles/who-were-the-sons-of-god-in-genesis-6/
When trying to work out what the luciferians are up to and what they deem to be “pure” bloodlines that have been given the right to rule the world, then the challenge becomes what do they believe.
Hi Islander, I read pages 369 (beginning at the heading ‘The Sons of God’ and got as far as halfway down page 371) and I already have two questions about its accuracy or reasoning. Below is a link to the text should anyone want to read it for themselves:
https://archive.org/details/earthsmorning00bonagoog/page/n378/mode/2up
Firstly, before the flood Nephilim are mentioned. After the flood there were no Nephilim, there were Rephaim and Anakim. Yet Horatius Bonar refers to Nephilim both before and after the flood – which is not correct. See some info below:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anakim
https://knowingscripture.com/articles/giants-in-the-land-a-biblical-theology-of-the-nephilim-anakim-rephaim-and-goliath
https://www.christianity.com/wiki/bible/who-are-the-rephaim-in-the-bible.html
Nephilim: “The Hebrew word nefilim is sometimes directly translated as “giants” or taken to mean “the fallen ones” (from the Hebrew naphal, “to fall”)”
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Nephilim
The word “Rephaim” means “terrible one” and it is often used to describe a race of giants.
https://www.gotquestions.org/Rephaim.html
Secondly, I do not believe nor had I heard anyone believing that God flooded the Earth (i.e. punished man) because of fallen angels’ sins – until you mentioned it. As soon as you said it I thought to myself “what a bizarre idea, where did that come from?” So to me, without reading the whole book to put it into context, Horatius Bonar is way off the beaten track using this as an argument why Nephilim are not offspring of human/fallen angels – it comes across as desperately trying to find a reason why “the old Jewish and patristic theory, revived by Drs. Kitto and Maitland” could not be true. So I have to question whether Horatius Bonar had a bias or an agenda.
Please note, there is no mention of marriage between humans and fallen angels in the Bible (which implies a long term commitment) as some try to claim, the interaction was purely for procreation purposes (sexual intercourse) – possibly to increase the number of evil souls on the Earth or to defile/degrade humans but more likely for satan to gain control over people on the Earth through the fallen angel offspring. Remember, before he created the Earth and all that is in it, God created a certain number of angels and He has not created any more since then. Angels cannot increase their number or reproduce as humans can. And every time a human is conceived, God creates a spirit for that person’s body. So as human numbers increase, so do the number of (human) spirits. God has then given each of us freewill to choose whether we will be among those who will fill up heaven or those who fill up hell. But were the spirits of Nephilim and Rephaim/Anakim (being offspring of fallen angels) bound to do satan’s will and found it more difficult to exercise their freewill? I don’t know.
Hi Islander, further to my previous comment, I’ve done a quick search of who Horatius Bonar was and it seems that he indeed had a bias, if not an agenda.
In 1843, Horatius Bonar joined the Free Church. The Free Church of Scotland is a conservative evangelical Calvinist denomination in Scotland.
The system of Christian theology known as Calvinism was developed by John Calvin. And John Calvin supported the Sethite view of the “sons of God” in Genesis 6.
Horatius Bonar published his book in 1875, 30 years after he joined the Calvinist Free Church. Is it any wonder that he had a Sethite view bias and found no other view acceptable?
As well as offering a fourth view on the interpretation of Genesis 6, the article ‘Who Are the Sons of God, Daughters of Man, and Nephilim?’ describes the history of the different interpretations of Genesis 6. Below are some extracts:
“Summary of the pre-Christian history of interpretation.
“The ancient understanding about the identity of the ‘sons of God’ is the angel view. Multiple textual witnesses in the intertestamental period and in the first century AD confirm this. However, after the first century AD, there were Jewish writings that leaned away from the “fallen angels” interpretation. Such writings adopted a non-supernatural view of the “sons of God,” but the “angel” view did not fade away entirely.
“Summary of early Christian interpretation.
“The earliest view of the ‘sons of God’ among the church fathers was that these were rebel angels who engaged in sexual sin with human women. This was the prevailing view in the first four centuries of the early church.
“From the 4th century AD onward, the ‘Sethite’ view – that the ‘sons of God’ in Genesis 6:2 were human descendants of Seth – gained traction.”
Which seems to contradict Horatius Bonar’s statement: “the old Jewish and patristic theory, revived by Drs. Kitto and Maitland.”
Rhoda,
You write;
“The system of Christian theology known as Calvinism was developed by John Calvin..”
This is NOT true: Calvin didn’t know he “developed” any “system of Christian theology”. He faithfully expounded what he found in the Scriptures. It is a fact that the nickname “Calvinism” or “Calvinist” only came to be a number of years after his death (Calvin never knew he was called such). Augustine taught Calvin’s theology! He was an early church father-long before Calvin arrived on the world stage.
You should study the Remonstrance/ Synod of Dort.
I believe in so-called Calvinistic theology (aka the doctrines of grace), because I have found it to agree with the Scriptures, as indeed Bonar and countless others have also.
Now is not the time to go down rabbit holes, or diversions we find in Scottish Church history such as why the Disruption came to be-the birth of the Free Church etc.
Calvin and Bonar were very good men, whose only agenda was/is the TRUTH! Calvin was seriously mistaken in his (to cut a long story short) belief that it was his job as it were, to set up God’s kingdom on earth in his life time. In other words he didn’t believe in the Lord’s pre-millenial Return.
Now, Bonar DID believe in the Lord’s pre-millennial Return, nevertheless he held to biblical soteriology (aka Calvinism).
Bonar wasn’t perfect either (maybe you are? no I don’t believe you’d make such a claim!?).
Bonar believed and taught the “Gap Theory”, that there maybe untold ages between the first two verses of Holy Writ-an absolutely awful theory! Bonar learned this from his mentor-Thomas Chalmers who first propagated it. This dreadful theory Bonar did indeed teach. But why? You mustn’t lose sight of the fact that Darwinism was very much on the rise back then-the great Victorian age of science-‘scientific discoveries’ were full-on with the Crystal Palace/Great Exhibition (we are now in a post scientific age-in my opinion at least).
It is also my opinion that Bonar has posited the Sethite ‘view’ , or should I say fact, in very clear terms (if you can receive it). I don’t hang on every word any man teaches, unless I find it agrees with God’s written Word.
Let us now stay focused only on DEMONOLOGY? The Nephilim?
Hi Islander, you say, “Now is not the time to go down rabbit holes.” It is necessary to understand the people behind the theological system you follow, if you follow one. If you are gong to place your faith in them, it is wise to understand what you are placing your faith in.
You say, “Calvin and Bonar were very good men.” I’m not implying otherwise. To point out that Bonar had a a pre-conceived idea (possibly 30 years in the making) does not imply he was wicked, it just means he was very set in his ideas when he wrote his book and so rejected any that didn’t agree with his view. Did he have an agenda? Sure he did, because if he did not agree with and promote the Free Church of Scotland’s doctrine then perhaps his position in it would have been downgraded or perhaps he would have been even kicked out, for example consider the commment below:
Dr Bella d’Abrera pointed out: “During the 1540s and 1550s, the city’s residents [Geneva] found themselves living under the puritanical rule of reformer John Calvin and his loyal acolytes, who, through a quasi-tribunal known as the Consistory, sought to implement a utopian Protestant society. Calvin’s radical re-engineering of society was made possible through discipline; a series of rules and regulations bolstered by the death penalty, exile, community surveillance and a system of ruinous fines.”
The above is one of the potential problems with organised religion – there is the risk that those within its hierarchy have to follow the church’s (man made) rules or suffer man’s consequences. We are fully aware of this problem in the Roman Catholic Church, but it is not the only organised religion that falls prey to man’s ambitions.
You say, “I believe in so-called Calvinistic theology.” Out of a sentiment of love, I caution you about following or “believing in” any theological system which is akin to following man’s instruction. The risk of following man’s teaching/instruction is that if that man/woman (or group of men/women) is wrong so will you be – and ignorance will not be a defence. We are told:
“But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren. And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.” Matthew 23:8-10 (KJV)
For a more readable version of the same:
“But you are not to be called ‘Rabbi,’ for you have one Teacher, and you are all brothers. And do not call anyone on earth ‘father,’ for you have one Father, and he is in heaven. Nor are you to be called instructors, for you have one Instructor, the Messiah.” Matthew 23:8-10 (NIV)
For those who may not be aware, in the New Testament, the term “rabbi” means “my master” or “teacher,” and it was a title of respect given to Jewish religious leaders and teachers. So we are told that, spiritually, no human is our teacher, leader, father or master because we are all equal (no one is above another) and we have only one teacher, leader, father and master who is God – God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit.
Which Christian church we go to on a Sunday is not important. Which Christian denomination we claim as our own is not important. What is important is our personal relationship with God, what is in our hearts and minds (our souls). I encourage everyone who reads the Bible and wants understanding about what is written to seek God’s instruction, not man’s.
As for demonology, it is not a subject I spend my time studying – it is a “science” that has arisen outside of Biblical teachings, I’m comfortable to listen to what others have to say for interest’s sake but I will not spend my time researching or verifying it, and I don’t take it to heart. I work on the assumption that if I know God and God’s ways, then by default I will recognise the works of God’s enemies.
I have had some personal experience/interest in what is commonly referred to as “spiritual warfare” in the past (with some, what could be called, “close encounters” with demons) and that will be my focus if I am called to do so again; which at it’s core is helping others to regain their lives and freedom from the evil one. Until then, I don’t freely give my time to satan or demons – except to bind them and their puppets on Earth. If God calls me into battle, I am confident that God will provide me with His knowledge and wisdom that I require to fight the good fight on that day. When He calls me to draw my sword, I will do so and use it as God instructs. It is not through our own strength or ability but through God’s that we have victory.
A biblical study on demonology, the Nephilim, and its implication on the ‘bloodlines’ therefrom.
Did devils (Gk. demons) that is fallen angels, exist in the OT era?
Early in creation’s morning, Satan apostatised from God and caused our first parents to fall.
In Job 1:6 and 2:1, we read that Satan came also among them, that is among the full company of angels (the elect, and those yet predestined to fall): the sons of God.
When Satan replied to God in the subsequent verses (1:7 & 2:2) there is zero suggestion that he has a legion of followers-the reading leaves us to conclude that he was acting alone.
In 1 Kings 22:19, we read of the Almighty; all the host of heaven were standing by Him on His right hand and on His left. This was the entire angelic host, and yet Satan, as can be deduced from reading the aforementioned verses in Job had unfettered access to accompany the sons of God (angels) when they came to present themselves before God. The great adversary had a peculiar and personal access to God in the OT dispensation. But should this surprise us, especially when we read of the personal access Satan enjoyed in his temptation of the Son of God in Matthew 4:1-11, Mark 1:12-13, & Luke 1:1-13? Satan is the parody of God the Father-the head of the unholy trinity.
The access Satan had to the Lord Jesus, however, was not in heaven as in above the firmament-high up in paradise; the third heaven (2 Corinthians 12:2). The third heaven being the very throne room of God. Satan’s access to the incarnate Deity was in the air; ether (Ephesians 2:2) that is the first heaven which reaches high up to the ceiling of the firmament.
When exactly did Satan lose his access to the heavenly realm above the firmament? This was immediately prior to the incarnation in Revelation 12:5. It was just before the Lord’s entrance on the world’s stage, born of a woman
Hi Islander, at first I couldn’t understand what you were trying to get across as it didn’t seem to fit in with what we were discussing. But then I realised you were starting a new discussion on what you’re calling demonology.
You say, “there is zero suggestion that [satan] has a legion of followers-the reading leaves us to conclude that he was acting alone.”
I don’t agree. A third of the angels followed satan and so were cast out of heaven with him.
“His [the dragon] tail swept a third of the stars from the sky, tossing them to the earth. And the dragon stood before the woman who was about to give birth, ready to devour her child as soon as she gave birth.” – Revelation 12:4
https://biblehub.com/revelation/12.htm
For context see other verses listed here: https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Satan-And-A-Third-Of-Angels-Caste-Out-Of-Heaven/
As for when satan and the angles that followed him were cast out of heaven, I tend to agree with article below which concludes that there are at least two separate castings out. It’s not something I’ve researched in any detail, but I resolve it in my mind that the first time he was cast out, satan couldn’t reside there but could still visit Heaven – a “soft” casting out if you will. This is why satan was able to stand in God’s presence as “the accuser” and accuse Job – at that time satan roamed the Earth but could also go up to Heaven. The second time, satan was cast out and could not return, a “hard” casting out if you will. From that time, satan could no longer visit Heaven, he could no longer be in God’s presence.
https://evidenceunseen.com/new-testament/revelation/difficulties/when-did-satan-sweep-a-third-of-the-angels-away-to-the-earth-when-was-satan-cast-out-of-heaven
To go off-topic a bit. One question I’ve often pondered is how many angels God created. We don’t know. There’s only one clue in the Bible: Revelation 5:11 describes “thousands of thousands, and ten thousand times ten thousand” angels, which suggests a number in the hundreds of millions. (10,000 x 10,000 = 100,000,000 and then we add the “thousands of thousands,” which is millions.) And these are the angels in Heaven (so represent two-thirds of the total number God created).
https://biblehub.com/revelation/5-11.htm
So if, for ease, let’s say 100,000,000 angels were created, then 33,300,000 angels fell with satan. I.e., if fallen angels equate to demons, then there are roughly 33,300,000 demons. It’s important to remember there are twice the number of angels who stayed faithful to God, in this example in the region of 66, 700,000 million angels who are faithful to God. However even in my simple calculation, we know there are more than that as I haven’t factored in the “thousands of thousands” (which equates to millions, 1,000 x 1,000 = 1,000,000).
To show how many angles there could be, Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges commentary says:
“ten thousand times ten thousand] Lit. myriads of myriads, the Greek (and Hebrew) language having a single word for the number 10,000: so that the effect is as if we should say “millions of millions and thousands of thousands” (in Genesis 24:60 words equivalent to these are translated “thousands of millions.”) In Daniel 7:10 the order is the reverse, “thousand thousands … and ten thousand times ten thousand,” with the obvious motive of a climax: here the effect is, “there were hundreds of millions massed together, and if you counted those in the mass, the numbers you would leave over would be millions still.” The passage in Daniel is also imitated in Enoch xiv. 24, xl. 1.”
https://biblehub.com/commentaries/revelation/5-11.htm
“(in Genesis 24:60 words equivalent to these are translated “thousands of millions.”) ” – thousands of millions is billions (1,000 x 1,000,000 = 1,000,000,000).
Remember Revelations 5:11 is referring to angels who were serving and worshipping God. It does not include the angels that chose to follow satan – “[the dragon’s] tail swept a third of the stars from the sky, tossing them to the earth.” It is the angels that remained faithful to God, the angels in Heaven, that I’m interested in – as I mentioned before, I’m not all that interested in demonology so I don’t spend much time researching it; satan is not worthy of my time.
I’m sorry Rhoda-Satan is worthy of my time-underestimate him at your peril!
I didn’t realise I sent the first part of my study last night-sent by mistake-I will send the concluding part later.
Dunce that I am.
Hi Islander, I think you might be misunderstanding me. I don’t underestimate satan; it’s that I believe God will deal with him. While on Earth I believe that I am asked to deal with things that relate to the physical world, matters concerning people and events on the Earth – and I believe God will deal with the spiritual realm. I have sufficient faith in God and His authority over all to leave it up to Him to deal with satan if I ask, and even if I don’t ask.
I base this on the words in the Lord’s prayer:
“Our Father, who art in Heaven … Lead us not into temptation and deliver us from evil.”
https://biblehub.com/library/kinkead/baltimore_catechism_no_4/the_lords_prayer.htm
The armour of God confirms this; that it is God who will protect us and not our human strength or knowledge: “Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.” – Ephesians 6:11
The whole armour of God is made up of: the Helmet of Salvation, the Shield of Faith, the Breastplate of Righteousness, the Belt of Truth, the Gospel of Peace and the Sword of the Spirit. God’s armour does not include gaining knowledge about satan or his demons. No matter how much knowledge someone acquires about satan, it will not help them (even if someone is engaged in what people refer to as “spiritual warfare,” it is done prayerfully, through Jesus Christ – it is not done through their own knowledge or strength). So why waste the time studying satan and his ways?
God gives us this protection against evil and fights our spiritual battles so that we can spend our time studying God’s ways, speaking about Jesus, seeking His Holy Spirit for guidance, glorifying God etc. – in short, so we focus on God, not satan.
Do you now understand why satan is not worth my time?
Satan is always “worthy of my time”. I put todays widespread unbelief in the Gospel of Jesus Christ (as many an old-time writer has) directly down to unbelief in the devil. If you don’t believe in him-why believe in the Antidote???
Hi Islander, I didn’t say I don’t believe in satan.
In a nutshell, I said: God is worthy of my time but satan is not.
Good evening Rhoda,
By error I sent the above whilst quoting Galatians 4:4, I will (God willing) send the rest of this short piece later/tomorrow.
God bless you.
Hi Islander, no problem. Mistakes may not be in our plan but sometimes mistakes are supposed to happen :).
When exactly did Satan lose his access to the heavenly realm above the firmament?
This was immediately prior to the incarnation in Revelation 12:5. It was just before the Lord’s entrance in human flesh on the world’s stage, born of a woman (Galatians 4:4) that Satan drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth (Revelation 12:4). The angels that were given over to Satan fell immediately prior to the Lord’s incarnation.
It was these fallen spirits that wreaked so much havoc in the Gospel narratives – to the extent that they literally possessed people, utterly ruining their lives. It was only through the direct intervention of the Lord and His apostles that such could be delivered therefrom.
So, demon (fallen angel) possession is unique to the NT dispensation.
Devils (Gk. demons) as recorded in the OT Scriptures is merely a pejorative term-denoting idolatry-the worshipping of a beast (he-goat, satyr) or any other man-made object, or whatever else idolaters would set up to worship. It might surprise one to learn that in the time honoured received text, the KJV1611(AV) the word devil is mentioned only four times in the OT (Leviticus 17:7, Deuteronomy 32:17, 2 Chronicles 11:15, Psalm 106:37). The concept of demon possession in mankind through fallen angels is read into (eisegesis) the OT Scriptures; actual possession thereof was peculiar only to the Gospel/apostolic period.
When the Lord and His apostles cast demons out of people, were they then free to re-enter others at will? NO! they were cast down to the bottomless pit. In Matthew 8:32 after the Lord cast out the demons, we read that the swine whom they possessed perished in the sea, but what of the demons? They were sent further down to the bottomless pit; only to return in a yet soon coming day when Revelation 9:2 begins to unfold.
But, what of the familiar spirit(s) we read of in the OT Scriptures? The plural of this phrase is recorded 9 times, the singular 6, and there is no mention thereof in the NT. Certainly Satan is not omnipresent, but as the entire OT centered around Israel and the nations immediately contiguous to her, he had a very ‘small’ area to operate in especially when we consider he was exceedingly energetic about his work; From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it. (Job 1:7 & 2:2). Whose but the spirit of Satan could persuade Ahab to fall at Ramoth Gilead (1 Kings 22:20-21)? There was none other to come among the host of heaven in 1 Kings 22:19.
As I think you know-the meaning of Nephilim is not as clear as we might like it to be, but as any good concordance will show-the Hebrew verb means nothing more than ‘to fall’.
Hi Islander, I’m not disagreeing with your interpretation of Revelations 12, that a third of the stars were dragged down to Earth etc.
As I mentioned, I believe there were at lest two casting out of Heaven. Each time the casting out had a different consequence, the punishment/judgment had a different effect.
The first time, before or during the first 5 days of the creation was a “soft” casting out, where satan lost his position if you will in Heaven, he was cast out in the sense he no longer resided there. So satan roamed the Earth (angels that are faithful to God do not roam the Earth, they only come down to Earth when God instructs them to do so – usually to give a message from God). But even though satan was cast out of Heaven (i.e. could not reside in God’s presence and so roamed the Earth), he could still visit Heaven, where God resides. I believe Genesis 3 indicates this. Satan was in the Garden of Eden without God instructing him to be there, and because satan corrupted Adam and Eve he was punished for a second time by God: “Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life.” Genesis 3:14
https://biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/3.htm
As for the giants mentioned in Genesis 6:4: “There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” To me this is unmistakeable and there is only one way to interpret it.
https://biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/6.htm
https://www.gotquestions.org/sons-of-God.html
I see some people attempt to discredit this as angels cannot create or marry. But they are playing on words.
First of all, the Bible does not say the “sons of God” married anyone – it simply says they “came in unto the daughters of men.”
Secondly, angels cannot reproduce like humans can – God has not given them the bodies to be able to do so. When a human is conceived, is a man or woman creating? No. We are simply using the reproductive abilities that God gave us, as he did to all life on Earth, to fulfill his command to “go forth and multiply” and “fill the Earth.”
So how, you might ask, could angels hijack the reproductive ability for their own purposes? Did angels witness creation and so had some understanding how God put it all together? Do they have the knowledge, and did they have the knowledge before the fact, of how Jesus was to be conceived? What knowledge may fallen angels have had or used? We don’t know – we have been simply told that fallen angels “came in unto” human women who bore them children. But consider that 4,300+ years later, humans are able to “create” baby animals and humans using artificial insemination or in vitro fertilisation. Some have even claimed to be able to clone animals (Dolly the sheep) and are attempting to clone humans. And now, some are claiming to be able to farm human babies in artificial wombs. All of these processes use the ability God gave to all living things to reproduce. Could angels have had this knowledge all along? Did the “sons of God” (i.e. fallen angels) have used similar technology to impregnate humans?
Then there is genetic engineering/manipulation, chimaeras, hybrids etc. Do angels have this knowledge as well? Did the “sons of God” (angels who disobeyed God, fallen angels) use this knowledge before Noah’s flood? Was this angelic knowledge “lost” to man because of Noah’s flood? Are humans only now catching up with the knowledge that fallen angels imparted/used on the Earth 4,300+ thousand years ago?
I don’t know. But for someone who feels the answers to these questions are important, they’re interesting questions to ponder.
Hello Rhoda,
The “soft casting out” theory, or two ejectments from heaven, has been held by many better men than me, but I don’t buy it. Satan apostatised from God, yet God still allowed him access to the heavenly courts right up to the incarnation when he was once and for all time cast out.
Though iniquity was found in thee (Satan) Ezekiel 28:15, yet he was not at that point in time cast to the ground: Ezekiel 28:17.
Any studious person that has spent no little time in the fallen angel theory knows full well that there was no ‘official’ marriage ceremony between the fallen angels and the earthly women-only that IF such a union did take place; the result would be the same as in a consummated marriage!
As for “Dolly the sheep” (I’ve been there!) and the rest of your speculations I Can’t comment upon, for the Bible is silent thereon. Yet we are a fallen race-and this powerfully suggests we were better at the beginning!
The BBC production entitled “The Power of Nightmares” is an excellent video to watch as related to this post
Free on archive.org: https://archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares-AdamCurtis
Hi
Marilynne L. Mellander,
That was an interesting video, until it said planes were used to bring down the twin towers.
We live in a world of fantasy and lies.
Freemasons fit into the story very well.
Freemasonry is directly connected with the creation of Israel.
Look at the monument in Eilat. And the masonic pyramid in the centre of the Supreme Court of Israel.
Hi Dave,
You write: “That was an interesting video, until it said planes were used to bring down the twin towers.”
My response: Adam Curtis, who made The Power of Nightmares for the BBC, accepts that Al-Qaeda, inspired by a violent Jihadi ideology, attacked 9/11.
Nothing could be further from the truth. Even Bin Laden said that he was not involved in 9/11.
Osama bin Laden Responsible for the 9/11 Attacks? Where is the Evidence?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/osama-bin-laden-responsible-for-the-9-11-attacks-where-is-the-evidence/15892
Dr. Alan Sabrosky, a Jew himself and a retired US Marine Corps officer and former Director of Studies at the United States Army War College’s Strategic Studies Institute, where he held the position of the Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research, said:
“100% Certain That 9/11 Was a Mossad Operation”:
https://youtu.be/P7xTsWsLbV4
James Corbett- The Attacks of 9/11 in 5 Minutes. “9/11: A Conspiracy Theory”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE0yu6DKoHQ
This is also a very good video on who did 9/11:
https://kingdomtruther.com/thejewsdid911/
Hi Rhoda,
A very good explanation of Moslem expansion.
Walter Veith seems to be a vey educated person, like yourself.
I have listened to him lot’s in times gone by.
The population of the UK was going down 25 years ago.
Since then the population has gone up 25 million.
It’s all been planned for years, the destruction of the UK.
Hi Dave Owen, you say, “A very good explanation.” Thank you.
Not just the UK!!! The whole world!!!
Alex Soros works with the Muslim Brotherhood; his father George Soros was initially funded for his “work” by Edwin Rothchild –
What a melting pot of ideas!!!
Jesus Christ is the Way the Truth and the Life. He told his followers that no-one can come to the Father except through him.
And that’s all you need to know and not forget when waves of zionist propaganda are dumping on you.
The club of Rome hey ?.. https://www.clubofrome.org/
“In 1974, the Club of Rome, an influential global think tank, proposed a provocative geopolitical framework dividing the world into ten regional blocs, now widely referred to as the “10 Kingdoms.” Born from concerns over overpopulation, environmental degradation, and economic instability, this proposal sought to address …9 Jan 2025″
[…] din ‘Ierarhia conspiratorilor„Mai jos, merită să luăm în considerare și teoria că Islamul a fost pornit de Vatican ca opoziție controlată și Cercetarea lui Leuren Moret, ceea ce a determinat -o să concluzioneze […]
[…] ниже, также стоит рассмотреть теорию о том, что ислам был основан Ватиканом как контролируемая оппозиция, и исследование […]