|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Using resources such as the books ‘None Dare Call It Conspiracy’ and ‘A Short Study of Esau-Edom In Jewry’, we examine what “Jew” means and whether the Rothschilds are Jews as is claimed.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Table of Contents
None Dare Call It Conspiracy
Carroll Quigley was an American historian and theorist of the evolution of civilisations, known for his teaching work as a professor at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, and his seminal works, including ‘Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time’ (1965).
‘Tragedy and Hope’ is a work of history covering the period of roughly 1880 to 1963. In the book, Quigley asserted that a secret society initially led by Cecil Rhodes, Alfred Milner and others had considerable influence over British and American foreign policy in the first half of the twentieth century. The book is written based on archived files from the Council on Foreign Relations.
Related: Myron Fagan: The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations (1967)
“Dr. Quigley reveals the existence of the conspiratorial network … The Professor is not merely formulating a theory, but revealing this network’s existence from firsthand experience. He also makes it clear that it is only the network’s secrecy and not their goals to which he objects,” Gary Allen wrote in his 1972 book ‘None Dare Call It Conspiracy’.
One of the purposes of Allen’s book was to discuss the revelations in Quigley’s ‘Tragedy and Hope’.
Allen quoted a passage from page 950 of Quigley’s book:
Professor Quigley discloses: “I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I HAVE NO AVERSION TO IT OR TO MOST OF ITS AIMS AND HAVE, FOR MUCH OF MY LIFE, BEEN CLOSE TO IT AND TO MANY OF ITS INSTRUMENTS. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies … but in general my chief difference of opinion is that IT WISHES TO REMAIN UNKNOWN, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.” (Emphasis added)
None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Gary Allen, 1972, pg.5
Allen commented:
We agree, its role in history does deserve to be known. That is why we have written this book. However, we most emphatically disagree with this network’s aim which the Professor describes as “nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.”
In other words, this power mad clique wants to control and rule the world. Even more frightening, they want total control over all individual actions. As Professor Quigley observes:
“…his [the individual’s] freedom and choice will be controlled within very narrow alternatives by the fact that he will be numbered from birth and followed, as a number, through his educational training, his required military or other public service, his tax contributions, his health and medical requirements, and his final retirement and death benefits.”
It wants control over all natural resources, business, banking and transportation by controlling the governments of the world. In order to accomplish these aims the conspirators have had no qualms about fomenting wars, depressions and hatred. They want a monopoly which would eliminate all competitors and destroy the free enterprise system. And Professor Quigley, of Harvard, Princeton and Georgetown approves!
Professor Quigley is not the only academic who is aware of the existence of a clique of serf-perpetuating conspirators.
None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Gary Allen, 1972, pg.5
There has been much talk of a Jewish conspiracy in recent years and so for the rest of this article, we will focus on the Jewish aspect and hopefully convince those who have fallen for it that the anti-Jewish rhetoric is part of the conspirators’ plan.
What Did Allen Say About Jews?
In his book, ‘None Dare Call It Conspiracy’, Allen made several points about Jews. We have used an AI summary of the book, which highlighted the following points:
1. Historical Victims of Communism: According to Dr. Barney Finkel, the book aims to make Jewish people aware of forces that attempt to manipulate them, as they have historically been “the number one historical victims of the Communist Conspiracy.”
2. Rothschilds and Anti-Semitism: Allen acknowledges that the Rothschilds were Jewish and played an important role in the conspiracy discussed in his book. However, he argues that anti-Semites play into the hands of the conspiracy by portraying the entire conspiracy as Jewish, which is untrue. He states, “It is just as unreasonable and immoral to blame all Jews for the crimes of the Rothschilds as it is to hold all Baptists responsible for the crimes of the Rockefellers.”
3. Exploitation and Suffering: Allen suggests that Jews have suffered most at the hands of the power seekers involved in the conspiracy. He claims that the Warburgs, part of the Rothschild empire, helped finance Adolph Hitler, and that few Rothschilds or Warburgs were in Nazi prison camps.
As with all AI programs, we should not take them as accurate and should check the content for accuracy. We haven’t done so. However, you can easily check the contents by referring to the book in PDF format HERE and conducting a search for keywords. For anyone who doesn’t understand what the conspiracy against us is, we encourage you to read the full book. At 118 pages, including lists of names, signposts to slavery, diagrams and images, it is a relatively short and easy read.
International Bankers Controlling Both Sides
Allen also noted how anti-Semitism was used during the Bolshevik Revolution as a cover to hide its true backers:
[Jacob] Schiff’s participation in the Bolshevik Revolution, though quite naturally now denied, was well known among Allied intelligence services at the time. This led to much talk about Bolshevism being a Jewish plot. The result was that the subject of financing the Communist takeover of Russia became taboo. Later evidence indicates that the bankrolling of the Bolsheviks was handled by a syndicate of international bankers, which in addition to the Schiff-Warburg clique, included Morgan and Rockefeller interests.
None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Gary Allen, 1972, pg.42
Explaining that these international bankers control both sides of a narrative or conflict, Allen wrote:
In the Bolshevik Revolution we have some of the world’s richest and most powerful men financing a movement [Communism] which claims its very existence is based on the concept of stripping of their wealth men like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Schiffs, Warburgs, Morgans, Harrimans and Milners. But obviously these men have no fear of international Communism. It is only logical to assume that if they financed it and do not fear it, it must be because they control it.
Remember that for over 150 years it has been standard operating procedure of the Rothschilds and their allies to control both sides of every conflict. You must have an “enemy” if you are going to collect from the King.
None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Gary Allen, 1972, pg.43 and 44
Related: Central banker tells his nephew: We control the press and the politicians
What Did Allen Say About the Rothschilds?
Allen noted the involvement of members of the Rothschild family in the world conspiracy numerous times. To mention all the instances would be too many for the purposes of this article, so we once again turn to an AI summary to highlight some of the mentions, and added some context. As well as making the point that the Rothschilds were Jewish and played an important role in the conspiracy, Allen also noted:
1. They were cosmopolitan and international, close to governments, and particularly concerned with political history. “In describing the characteristics of the Rothschilds and other major international bankers, Dr. Quigley tells us that they remained different from ordinary bankers in several ways: they were cosmopolitan and international; they were close to governments and were particularly concerned with government debts, including foreign government debts; these bankers came to be called ‘international bankers’,” Allen wrote.
2. The Rothschilds had a powerful influence on dictating American financial laws. “Under the surface, the Rothschilds long had a powerful influence in dictating American financial laws. The law records show that they were powers in the old Bank of the United States [abolished by Andrew Jackson],” Allen wrote.
3. Lord Rothschild backed the Round Table Group. “Englishman named Lord Alfred Milner, the organiser and head of a secret organisation called the Round Table Group, which was backed by Lord Rothschild,” Allen wrote.
Allen didn’t note who “Lord Rothschild” was, but we can trace which member of the Rothschild family is being referred to through Cecil Rhodes’ will.
“The Round Table organisation in England grew out of the lifelong dream of gold and diamond magnate Cecil Rhodes for a ‘new world order’,” Allen said. “ Cecil Rhodes’ commitment to a conspiracy to establish World Government was set down in a series of wills.”
“Lord Rothschild” was named the sole beneficiary in Rhodes’ third will. It is believed that “Lord Rothschild” was Nathaniel Rothschild, who was also the executor of Rhodes’ estate.
Nathaniel Rothschild was a British banker and a prominent member of the Rothschild family. Nathaniel provided financial support to Rhodes, who was a key figure in the colonisation of Southern Africa.
“Apparently for strategic reasons Lord Rothschild was subsequently removed from the forefront of the scheme. Professor Quigley reveals that Lord Rosebury ‘replaced his father-in-law, Lord Rothschild, in Rhodes’ secret group and was made a Trustee under Rhodes’ next (and last) will’,” Allen wrote.
Related:
- The American Rhodes Scholarships, Frank Aydelotte, 1946
- How Cecil Rhodes Fathered the Modern Globalist Movement: a Timeline, Sto Vounó, 21 February 2029
4. The Rothschilds have more in common with the Rockefellers than with other Jewish people.
5. Speaking of the “modern day” Rothschilds, Edmond and Guy de Rothschild are the leaders of the French Rothschild clan, Allen noted. Quoting Time, 20 December 1963, Allen wrote: “Guy is every inch a Rothschild. He personifies much of what the family name stands for … He is a friend and confidante of some of France’s politicians … Most of all, he is dedicated to enlarging the fortune of his bank … Guy heads a versatile clan of modern-day Rothschilds.”
Who is the Head of the Rothschilds?
It is common to come across social media posts claiming a Jewish conspiracy behind, well, just about everything bad that happens in the world today – mantras reminiscent of the Jewish conspiracy spread in the lead up to World War II, not only in Nazi Germany but beyond. It is fairly obvious to us now that the Jewish conspiracy theory prominent in Nazi Germany was a PsyOp, but at the time, many were taken in by it. And it seems that today, too many have not learnt from history and have again been taken in by it.
The majority of posts, articles and videos promoting a Jewish conspiracy in recent years are based on naming a handful of influential people who are, it is claimed, Jewish. It’s disappointing that so few have recognised the narrative for what it is – a PsyOp – particularly when the ebb and flow of anti-Jewish propaganda correlates with neo-Nazi activity in Ukraine and/or Islamic State or Muslim Brotherhood activity in the Middle East.
The Rothschilds are certainly villains and need to be held accountable. The aim here is not to deny or defend the Rothschilds’ involvement in global events, perhaps for the last 200 hundred years, but to try to correct those who are getting distracted and misdirected from who the real villains are by following a PsyOp that there is a Jewish conspiracy afoot.
There seems to be a widely held belief that the English branch of the Rothschild family is the head of the family’s global operations. Based on this erroneous belief, the most commonly named villain in recent years has been Jacob Rothschild, who died last year.
The first point to note is that Jacob Rothschild was the head of the English House of Rothschild. But as Allen noted in 1972, the “modern day Rothschilds” are French. It is plain to see that Jacob, contrary to countless claims on social media and in alternative media, was not the head of the global Rothschild empire.
Not only has anti-Jewish propaganda made Jacob the target, but social media posts and alternative media have failed to inform people who the head of the global Rothschild empire is. And so, the public has missed its target. We should question why social media posts and alternative media would want to distract from the Rothschild empire’s head.
The next logical question is whether the anti-Jacob campaign has been run by the conspirators themselves. As Allen pointed out, “It has been standard operating procedure of the Rothschilds and their allies to control both sides of every conflict.”
Brief History of the Rothschilds’ Management
Jacob left N M Rothschild & Sons in 1980 after clashing with his cousin Evelyn. As Bloomberg reported in 2019, “Four decades ago, Jacob Rothschild did something crazy. After a family falling out, he turned his back on the riches of Europe’s biggest banking dynasty to pursue his own interests.”
Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, from the English branch of the Rothschild family, was chairman of N M Rothschild between 1976 and 2003. In 2003, the merger of the British and French operations consolidated the family’s interests into a single global brand, Rothschild & Co. In that year, David de Rothschild, from the French branch of the Rothschild family, took over the chairmanship of the consolidated operations.
“The appointment of David de Rothschild as the Rothschild Group Chairman brought together again the English and French Rothschild business houses, the realisation of a long-held plan to unify structures for all of the financial entities held by the businesses,” a timeline on The Rothschild Archive states.
According to the timeline, the firm rebranded to become Rothschild & Co in 2015. In 2018, Alexandre de Rothschild succeeded his father, David, and was appointed Rothschild & Co.’s Executive Chairman.
Serving alongside Alexandre are Group CFO and COO Mark Crump, Head of Legal and Compliance Elsa Fraysse, Five Arrows Managing Partner Javed Khan, Co-Chairman of the Group Partners Committee, Global Advisory, Robert Leitão, Co-Chairman of the Group Partners Committee, Wealth and Asset Management, François Pérol and Group Head of Human Resources Jess Reoch.
As well as the collaborators on the management board, there are several members in the Group Partner Committee and the Supervisory Board. Among the Supervisory Board are members bearing the name “de Rothschild,” a former Lord Mayor of the City of London and cross-bench peer Lord Mark Sedwill, who is also a member of the UK Parliament’s Joint Committee on National Security Strategy.
All of these co-conspirators have gone under the radar because the public’s attention was focused on one person: Jacob Rothschild, who parted ways with the major operations of the family in 1980.
Are the Rothschilds Jewish?
“Indeed I will make those of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but lie – indeed I will make them come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you.” Revelation 3:9
On its ‘Rothschild family’ page, Wikipedia’s opening statement reads: “The Rothschild family is a wealthy Ashkenazi Jewish noble banking family originally from Frankfurt.” But on its ‘Genealogy of the Rothschild family’ page, Wikipedia opens with the statement: “The Rothschild family is a European family of German Jewish origin.”
The Rothschild Foundation refers to them as “a pan-European Jewish family.”
Regardless of whether they are labelled Jews or Ashkenazi Jews, all claims of the Rothschilds’ Jewishness are dubious and should be called into question.
What Does “Jew” Mean?
According to C. F. Parker, Ashkenazic Jewry is comprised of three elements: those of Judahite descent, those of Idumean origin and proselytes (converts) of other origins. The proportions of each are unknown.
Idumeans are people of Edomite origin, which Parker describes as “false Jewry.” Edomites were a Semitic people who inhabited the region of Edom. They were descendants of Esau, the twin brother of Jacob. Jacob (later named Israel) became the father of the 12 tribes of Israel, or the Israelites.
We know of no evidence indicating that more than a part of modern Jewry is of Edomite origin; our data point to this element being mainly, but perhaps not entirely, contained in the Ashkenazim, or Central European Jews, whose numbers increased, especially in the eighth century AD and thereabouts, through the proselytising of the Khazars, a people of obscure, but probably Asiatic, non-Semitic origin. The Edomite element may, for all we know, be a minority among the Ashkenazim. [Emphasis added]
A Short Study of Esau-Edom In Jewry, C.F. Parker, 1949, pg. 41
Semitic refers to the Semitic languages and the people who speak them. According to Wikipedia, “Semitic people or Semites is a term for an ethnic, cultural or racial group associated with people of the Middle East and the Horn of Africa, including Akkadians (Assyrians and Babylonians), Arabs, Arameans, Canaanites (Ammonites, Edomites, Israelites, Moabites, Phoenicians and Philistines) and Habesha peoples.”
Khazars were Turkic peoples. Kevin Alan Brook, author of ‘The Jews of Khazaria’, wrote, “The Khazars were a Turkic people who originated in Central Asia … In the beginning, the Khazars believed in Tengri shamanism, spoke a Turkic language and were nomadic. Later, the Khazars adopted Judaism, Islam and Christianity.”
Read more: An Introduction to the History of Khazaria, Kevin Alan Brook, December 2022
Parker further explained that the word “Jew” was derived from “that of Judah” after people returned to Jerusalem in 538 BC from captivity in Babylon. The word applied to:
- the Judahites (the people of Judah) who did not return,
- the people of Judah, Benjamin and Levi who returned to form the nation of the Jews, which lasted until 70 AD,
- the many proselytes: Idumeans, Itureans (a semi-nomadic Arab tribe) and others who became joined to the Jewish nation, and
- the remnants of the three groups above after the destruction and scattering of the Jewish nation, when they all became indistinguishable, and joined by further proselytes from among the Khazars, Indians, Chinese, Africans, etc. – the modern Jews.
“It is wrong … to speak of modern Jews as a nation. Their nation was destroyed by Titus in AD 70 and has not been re-established,” Parker wrote. He referred to the 1885 Pittsburgh Conference of Reform Judaism, which affirmed this: “We consider ourselves no longer a nation, but a religious community only.”
Based on this distinction of Jews being a religious community, not all Judahites are Jews. Parker wrote:
While one should not refer to all Judahites as Jews, it is equally erroneous to identify all Jews as Judahites, for the reasons given earlier. The Idumean progeny of Esau, although absorbed by the Jewish nation, were never part of the kingdom of Judah and had no origins in the tribe of Judah. Nor have the many converts to Judaism since the destruction of the Jewish nation any descent from Judah. We have already mentioned the Khazars of European Russia; we might also enumerate a host of others – the black Jews of Malabar, Abyssinia, Nubia, the Gold Coast; the Mongoloid Jews of China, and so on. The modern racial composition of the Jews is highly complex; and the words of the Encyclopaedia Britannica are a fitting summary: “Jews … The name came to mean the followers of Judaism, including inborn and proselytes, the racial signification diminishing as the religious increased” (1946 ed.).
Racially the Jews are greatly mixed: they are linked together by cultural bonds only. “There can be no Judaism without Jews; that is a truism. It is equally true that there can be no Jews without Judaism” (Rabbi Dr. Mattuck, in the Liberal Jewish Monthly, January 1943). The last part of this statement is most important: the abandonment of Judaism by an individual means the extinction of a Jew.
The term “Jew” has no racial significance today. It is sociological, and bears reference to belief only. Even here it should be noted there are differences of religious belief, ranging from orthodox to liberal, atheistic and Communist, with the extremes, as in the case of Pharisees and Sadducees being spiritual enemies; we have the recent denunciation by Dr. Rabinowitz of Political Zionism to illustrate this point. [Emphasis added]
A Short Study of Esau-Edom In Jewry, C.F. Parker, 1949, pg. 49
Related: Khazaria, Rothschild Dynasty, New World Order, Ukraine and Implementation of the Nephilim Agenda
Why have we quoted Parker at length? For two reasons. Firstly, to demonstrate that Ashkenazi Jews include converts to Judaism, a religious group comprising many races. Secondly, to demonstrate that even the term “Jew” is not a description of a person’s racial group or nationality. As it is with Christianity, Jew is a description of a person’s faith, their religious belief.
How does that apply to the Rothschilds? Whether they are referred to as Ashkenazi Jews or Jews, the proof of whether they are Jewish lies in their religious beliefs. So, are the Rothschilds Jewish?
Read the comments posted on Yeshiva World News HERE. The question posted is “Are there any frum Rothschilds?” “Frum” is Yiddish to describe Jewish religious devotion. The comments may surprise you.
And even for those who naively think “Jew” relates to a race and the Rothschilds are genetically descended from this race, doubt is cast on the Rothschilds’ “Jewishness.” Consider the remark made by Australian Jewish News in 2022 about James Rothschild, a member of the English branch of the Rothschild family. The outlet said, “While Rothschild is not strictly considered Jewish, in this late stage of the Rothschilds’ Diaspora history, he still has Jewish roots.”
And if you were wondering about social media’s arch-villain, Jacob Rothschild’s beliefs, the image below may help you to decide whether he followed God or satan. The photograph is of Jacob posing next to Marina Abramović, in front of a painting titled “Satan Summoning his Legions.”
In November 2019, Abramović, who has been openly involved in satanic practices and described it as “art,” delivered the second Rothschild Foundation Lecture ahead of her exhibition at the Royal Academy of Arts in September 2020. It’s unclear when the photograph below was taken, but a copy of it was posted on Instagram on 4 December 2019, indicating it could have been taken around the time of Abramović’s Rothschild-sponsored lecture.
Related:
- 8 Bizarre Performances by Marina Abramović That Will Leave You Open-Mouthed, Rocio Becerra
- Over 40 Years Ago, John Todd Warned About An 8-Step Plan to Take Over the World
What of the Rothschilds’ Nobility?
It should also be noted that the family’s claim to “nobility” is relatively recent. Wikipedia notes: “The five sons of Mayer Amschel Rothschild were elevated to the Austrian nobility by Emperor Francis I of Austria, and they were all granted the Austrian hereditary title of Freiherr (baron) on 29 September 1822. The British branch of the family was elevated by Queen Victoria, who granted the hereditary title of baronet (1847) and later the hereditary peerage title of Baron Rothschild (1885).”
“Mayer Rothschild successfully kept the fortune in the family with carefully arranged marriages, often between first or second cousins (similar to royal intermarriage). By the late 19th century, however, almost all Rothschilds had started to marry outside the family, usually into the aristocracy or other financial dynasties,” Wikipedia says.
The Rothschilds’ nobility is not in the same ballpark as the Venetian Black Nobility (who date back to the Roman Empire), although they do operate in the same circles. In his 1991 book ‘Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300’, John Coleman listed “Elie or Edmon de Rothschild and/or Baron Rothschild” in the list of “past and present” members of the Committee of 300. Elie, who died in 2007, was the guardian of the French branch of the Rothschild family banking dynasty.
Related:
- The Black Nobility, a New World Order and Charles “The Great Reset” King
- The Roman Empire didn’t die, it went underground: Descendants of Roman Emperors continue to shape global events today
- The Babylon Conspiracy viewed from two angles
Featured image: Jacob Rothschild, deceased (right). David de Rothschild, Honorary Chairman of the Supervisory Committee of Rothschild & Co. (centre). Alexandre de Rothschild, Executive Chairman Rothschild & Co. (left).
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: UK News, World News
Why is it so hard to scroll on your page?
[…] International Bankers Controlling Both Sides […]
Hi Rhoda, I have been reading your work for years. So many of your articles are interesting to me as a historian of world events.
Just wanted to note that not all of Germany was Communist. Under Hitler, Nazism was Socialism. In 70 AD, Titus destroyed the Jewish Temple, not a nation because they were not a nation then until 1948. The Romans persecuted Jews and Christians and caused them to disperse throughout the world. Those who ended up in Germany could practice their religion until Hitler. Judaism is not a race but a religion. In all religions, we find the righteous and the wicked. People like George Soros, Chuck Schumer, Bernie Sanders, and others like the Rothschilds claim to be Jewish but hate Israel. The One World Order is here and now composed of people from all religions, like Catholics. Pope Francis could have been the false prophet.
Hi Sandra Henley, you say, “The One World Order is here and now composed of people from all religions.” Indeed, imposters are everywhere, they put on whatever clothes they require to deceive the masses.
Regarding Hitler, my current view (from what I’ve read etc) is that he was one of their puppets, much like Zelensky is now. In fact, I have often wondered if they have modeled Zelensky on Hitler because the Hitler agenda/campaign/programme was one of their great successes.
It’s like covid, its dead and buried for our generation but they have learnt their lessons and they will come back with a covid-like agenda in a generation or two and try it again on a naive population.
You certainly know your “stuff”! Great reply.
She’s not stupid! She knows her Saviour! (IMHO).
Hi Islander, Amen.
Hi Marlene, thank you. We all know some things :). It seems the more we know the more we realise how little we really know.
Rhoda,
When you write; “a generation or two” can I ask you the length of time you believe “a generation” to be?
Hi Islander, I don’t know, I wasn’t referring to a time in years, I was referring to the living memory of generations. If we think about it logically …
While the generation who is alive now, who has lived experience, is still alive they’re not likely to get away with a covid-like operation again – and they know that.
So, like WWII, they need the generation with lived experience and possibly their children (who parents will educate though word of mouth as to what really happened) to die off. When what we have experienced is no longer in living memory – then they can try again. Of course, the only documents, documentaries, books etc available to future generations stating what happened will be the ones that they allow. And children will be taught the official narrative in school.
PS: Re WWII – I believe this is part (a small part) of the reason why they targeted the elderly first with lockdowns, hospital protocols etc and then with covid injections – to get rid of the living memory of WWII before they attempted to start WWIII. And I note that there was no living memory left of the Spanish flu “pandemic” (1918-1920) when they attempted the covid “pandemic” (2020). So perhaps that gives us a guestimate timeline – in about 100 years, c.2120 they might try another covid-like operation.
Perhaps in another 1000 years they might try something else?
I’m no any moment rapture man, but considering it is little over a 100 years since man first went airborne, I find your timelines simply staggering!
Hi Islander, I’m confused by your comment. Where or how does the “1,000 years” you refer to fit in?
You say, “considering it is little over a 100 years since man first went airborne, I find your timelines simply staggering!”
I guessed they might try another covid-like operation in about 100 years’ time (based on the number of years between the Spanish flu “pandemic” and its “once in a century pandemic” sister, covid)? What’s your guess as to when they might try a covid-like operation again?
Evening Rhoda,
I’ll get back to you on this, in a day or two, God willing!
I’m not sat in front of a computer all day-I’ve been doing physical work outside all day.
First things first-I’ll deal with the Talmudic writings first-hopefully later.
Hi Islander, “not sat in front of a computer all day” and “doing physical work outside.” All good healthy things to be doing, or not doing depending on what it is we’re referring to.
But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you.
For yourselves know perfectly well that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night.
For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with a child; and they shall not escape.
1 Thessalonians 5:1-3.
There are a great many professing Christians in our day who believe their rapture is long overdue. Many think Trump is the antichrist! Many also believe we are in the last seven years of Daniel’s seventieth week (even the last half thereof-of great tribulation)-I kid you not!!!
So, as in your last comment; when you nonchalantly say “they might try another covid-like operation in about 100 years time-it leaves me absolutely floored!!!
The !000 years is the soon coming Lord’s millennial reign-some think we are currently in it! There’s too much ground to cover on this topic in this comment-volumes have been written upon it-only for it to be gainsaid.
There remains two specific prophesied events of great moment to come upon Earth before the Lord’s Return in glory. I believe they will be fulfilled within the next 20-25 years.
Hi Islander, we’re talking about two different things which is why your 1,000 years remark confused me.
I’m referring to the Globalists attempting another worldwide pandemic operation to grab more power and control.
It seems you are referring to the end of days according to the prophesies in Revelations, which is a completely different thing.
If you want to know when I think the Earth’s final days are, then that’s the question you needed to ask me. I answered the question you asked: which was how long is a generation after I said I thought the Globalists would try another covid-like operation in one or two generations.
As for Jesus’ second coming, I don’t know the day, the hour, the year or even the decade, but I don’t believe it will be for a couple of hundred years. I believe some time around 2239 (29 September 2239 to be more precise, give or take a couple of decades) is when people need to start being alert to the signs God has warned us of. Until then, we can use Revelations to understand how and why they are setting things up and where it will all end.
“Judaism is not a race, but a religion.” How do you separate the two?
Mosaic Judaism was biblical-Christianity is the fruit that rose from this Truth.
What passes for Judaism today is anything but the truth; it is Talmudic Judaism-satanic to the uttermost.
I’m very sure all unbelieving Jews in our day are set apart from the rest of the human race. Unbelieving Jews are a law (a race) unto themselves…
Hi Islander, referring to your remark, “… Talmudic Judaism-satanic …”
Which Talmud are you referring to? And where precisely in the Talmud are referencing? I ask because the Talmud is not as clear cut as people like to make out. Consider the following:
“The Talmud is a record of rabbinical discussions pertaining to Jewish law … There are two versions of the Talmud—the Babylonian Talmud and the Jerusalem Talmud — each containing basically the same Mishnah but a different Gemara.
“The Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.), the first written compendium of Judaism’s Oral Law; and the Gemara (c. 500 C.E.), a rabbinical discussion of the Mishnah and related writings … In the three centuries following the redaction of the Mishnah, rabbis throughout Palestine and Babylonia analyzed, debated and discussed that work. These discussions form the Gemara.
“Much of the Gemara consists of legal analysis. The starting point for the analysis is usually a legal statement found in a Mishnah. The statement is then analyzed and compared with other statements in a dialectical exchange between two (frequently anonymous and sometimes metaphorical) disputants, termed the makshan (questioner) and tartzan (answerer).”
https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Talmud
So are we to understand that much of the Talmud is simply documented religious debate between different Rabbis? For a secular comparison, is this similar to Hansard which records debates held in Parliament between MPs or Lords? Or for a Christian comparison, is it similar to a Bible commentary, but without the debate? That’s why I would be interested to see one of the passages you are referring to as “satanic” in the Talmud so I can see if it was part of the Mishnah or part of the debate, i.e. there is a particular Rabbi that held the view you are referring to, and what other Rabbis said in response. Looking into who that particular Rabbi was and his sect (if he was known to part of one) might be interesting.
The other question I have is how many Jews follow each of the two (or more) versions of the Talmud, particularly in the sense that they only follow what one particular Rabbi says while ignoring all other arguments? I ask this because I saw a comment from someone who said they were Jewish and he claimed that very few follow the Talmud these days, that the Talmud was basically seen as a historical book and the book Jews follow is the Torah (the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, namely the books of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy). I tried to find that comment again so you can assess it for yourself, but failed. Instead I found the comment below on Quora that said only “the Haridim and other Orthodox groups” “believe” in the Talmud. Confirming the above, the commentator on Quora also noted, “The Talmud is a collection of commentaries from different Rabbis Rashi, Akiba Maimonides etc.”
https://www.quora.com/How-many-Jews-follow-the-Babylonian-Talmud
Rhoda,
When I posted that comment-it was the Babylonian Talmud that I was referring to. Nevertheless as an evangelical Christian-I believe (more so KNOW!) that any religious document that doesn’t point to the crucified Son of God as Saviour (Acts 4:12) is utterly satanic.
I am sure that there are Jews here, there, and everywhere that see the Talmud only “as a historical book”. Likewise, are there not nominal Christians who think in a similar way regards the Holy Bible?
Hi Islander, thank for the explanation. I was hoping you had a particular passage you knew of that I could take a look at. There have been many accusations against the Talmud in recent years yet, its always the same, no details provided.
It seems to have become normalised to label all sorts of things in an effort to demonise people etc – accusations of “far right,” “fascism,” “conspiracy theorist” abound. You can’t hardly look at a screen without coming across such accusations being carelessly thrown about. It gets to the point where these words lose their power and are meaningless.
For the vast majority, “satanic” has a specific meaning. We should be aware of the effect we are having on others when we use certain words. For it is “what comes out of the mouth, [that] defiles a man.” Matthew 15:11
https://biblehub.com/matthew/15-11.htm
I’d rather not quote the gut wrenching sickening words-you are well capable of looking them up for yourself.
Hi Islander, I have tried. I’ve done an internet query for passages that are controversial passages in the Talmud. About 4 passages were returned in the search result and I checked two of those passages in the Babylonian Talmud. For the two passages quoted, the Babylonian Talmud does not say what is claimed. Perhaps I should have looked at the Jerusalem Talmud as well, but to be honest the specific accusations against the Talmud I was looking at started to look like a con to me as the Talmud passages weren’t even discussing the topic claimed (it wasn’t a case of different words used perhaps in translating it, it was whole other topics), so I didn’t bother. Hence I asked you (who said that it was “satanic”) hoping you had a specific passage I could look at to see if it says as you say or if I feel it was reasonable to interpret it the way you have. You don’t have to quote the words if it makes you feel sick, you can simply give the reference, e.g. Avodah Zarah 26b. From that I can find and read it for myself (providing we are both looking at the same version). Assuming it is part of the debate between the Rabbis, I would also like to see which Rabbi said it and how the other Rabbis responded to his remarks. If I can, I’d like to see what that particular Rabbi’s background was. One bad egg does not make a bad nest.
For what it’s worth, below is a Wikipedia article on mentions of what some think is Jesus in the Talmud. Whether Wikipedia is correct or not, this article demonstrates the problem with people not providing details to support their claims about what is said in the Talmud.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_in_the_Talmud
Under the heading Talmudic Judaism:
“We must further recall that unlike the God-given Judaism of Moses and the prophets, the corrupted Judaism denying the messiahship of Christ and the Father-Son relationship is, like Islam, an antichrist religion which we call Talmudic Judaism.” Talmudic Judaism, moreover, will be used by Satan and has been used by Satan to attempt the destruction of the Jewish people.
The rebirth of the modern state of Israel as one example, prophesied by both the Hebrew prophets and by Jesus, was championed by secular Jewish Zionists but opposed by the rabbis because, after rejecting its Messiah, Judaism mutated into Talmudic apostasy.”
Page 437: James Jacob Prasch’s (Moriel Ministries) SHADOWS OF THE BEAST-How the identity of the coming antichrist will be revealed to the faithful church.
There’s bucket loads more I could say about this man, but to get to the root of the matter; I believe it was Prasch who deceived me on the Talmud. I have done a little research this evening, on this, and I now don’t believe those absolutely awful sayings can be attributed to the Talmudic writings.
Prasch’s book was first released in May 2011, and I read it in its entirety within the first week of its publication. I was previously influenced by this man’s teachings, and I would attend his meetings whenever he visited the UK-in fact it was in late May/early June 2011 (from memory) that he visited a church in Kingswood Bristol when the cracks in his teachings completely unsettled me-this WAS the year of the 500th anniversary of the time honoured received text-KJV1611! Prasch was “shocked” when I told him that I read his work in such a short time frame.
Anyway, (before I discovered the Old Paths-Reformed Teachings) I was subjected to this liar, railer, and general all round apostatizer/ heretic-call him what you will.
I believe it was Prasch who led me astray on the precise renderings of the Talmud’s: (not that any Talmudic teaching can lead us to Jesus). I believe he verbally accredited those ‘quotes’ about our Saviour, and Mary to the Talmud’s. Prasch would often say things verbally in a recorded ministry only for them to be pulled later.
I’m about to fall asleep-but I’m grateful for your correction on this.
Why would an unbelieving Jew study the New Testament?
Why would a believing Christian study the Talmud’s?
Hi Islander, I haven’t heard of James Jacob Prasch but I’ll take your word for it.
As for the Talmud, I’ll keep asking if I see someone post something about it and see if anything solid turns up. If I manage to find something about it worth commenting on, I’ll let you know.
Rhoda,
If I’ve learned anything from our conversation on this ere subject, it is this-don’t trust any second-hand source-get to the “root of it to find the truth of it”.
Since dropping Prasch back in 2011-12, pretty much immediately I discovered the “Old Paths”- Reformed, Protestant & thoroughly Calvinistic converts to Christianity-Jewish writers, teachers, and preachers such as Adolph Saphir (1831-1891) and David Baron (1855-1926), men (Jews!) who were familiar with the Talmudic writings (more so Baron) before coming to the Truth in Christ.
I don’t claim to have read every drop of ink from their pens, but I have read much of their work-isn’t it a wee bit strange they never once gave just a little insight into the vile sayings attributed to the Talmuds?
I have only ever had one Jewish acquaintance (an atheist) – an archetypical one – short, hooked nosed and potbelly, almost a cartoon character to look at! He was very wealthy, and cunning and shrewd in business – he did me no harm. I asked him once (about 30 years ago) “what do you think of Jesus?” to which he sharply replied “He was an imposter” shrugged his shoulders and moved on…
Hi Islander, you say “don’t trust any second-hand source.” This is my motto and why I am so pedantic about providing sources where ever possible in my articles – because I appreciate a link to a source that I can assess for myself so I think others should be given the same opportunity.
Re Jews and Jesus … Jews don’t believe the Messiah has already come, they are still waiting for him – but at least they know he is coming. There is only one faith in the world that recognises Jesus as the Messiah – Christianity. Accepting Jesus as our personal Lord and Saviour is what sets Christians apart from all the other thousands of religious beliefs. Jews are awaiting the Messiah’s first coming, Christians are awaiting the Messiah’s second coming; this is the major and most notable difference between Jews and Christians.
Not only are the Rothschilds jewish but their concept of the New World Order is based on the “Jewish Utopia” that is referred to in the Talmud. One World Government aka Global Communism.
In the 16/17 century Amsterdam came the Jews by blood (Semitic) from Portugal (e.g.,Baruch Spinoza) and Spain, They were refugees from Empress Isabel and under her dictate they could not uphold their kosher life. In Amsterdam, under the Kazharian/ Ashkenazi Jews, because of having interrupted kosher life, the Semite were often treated as a second tier Jew and/or forced to accept their ruler-ship. E.g., there were several assassination attempts on Spinoza, due to his free writings.
“Double Dutch”, going dutch” refers to the Amsterdam Kazharian Jews entering in 17 century England. This along with ‘Townholder III William of Orange, who was brought up and educated by a Dutch banker family.
This dynamic between the Semite and Ashkenazim Jews continued through our whole history.
E.g., Hitler agitated against the wealth and power of the Jews, but he got financed by the Bankers in Amsterdam, London, new York, the USA and Swiss who were all part of the Ashkenazi dynasty.Those who went to the Concentration camps were mainly Semite jews. The Nazi had a particular description with drawings of how those Semites could be recognized: they had Palestinian features.
Designs for concentration camps and how to treat inmates came from Chamberlain, based on experiences in S-Africa under Chesil Rhodes.
The Semite end destination was not death, but to be deported to Palestine/ Ottoman empire.. Hitler was a co-designer of ‘Israel’.
J. Stalin offered Hitler to transfer his Jews into Russia/ Ukraine
The only aim of the Nazi Germany (as for the Rockefeller and Rothschild; see the Adam brother in 1904) was to breakup Russia. When the Nazi entered the Ukraine, they met their co-conspirator Ashkenazim jews and people with blue eyes and blondish hair; who formed the Stefan Bandera Group; together they entered Russia via Kursk.
V. Zelensky (having blue eyes) also claims to be Jew. He is financed by the same bankers families as Hitler was; There isn’t much that D. Trump can do against: He is not in control of the NATO which is a re-frament and continuation of the NAZI
there’s picture evidence of Rothschild,s index finger in prince charles chest . He’s a so called king now . there’s a picture of the pope kissing a whole bunch of feet .
This one?
Denying Jewish power is stupid, we can clearly see how munch influence they have in each Western country, so much power that they can influence the creation of laws to protect them.
Please tell us who owns Blackrock, Vanguard, and State St.
I stooped reading when you said you had used an AI summary of the book. I don’t trust AI and nor should you. How do you know it summarised the book correctly? However your article is useful as I will go and purchase a copy of None Dare Call It Conspiracy.
Strange, Exposé sold his soul to the Zionists. You know well what they’re doing in Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon, and what they’ve done to Iran. The New World Government you’re denouncing is Zionist, and above all, Israel was certainly founded by the Rothschild bankers.
https://warprofiteerstory.blogspot.com/p/war-profiteers-and-israels-bank.html
Hi Iskra, you have an interesting profile name. Is it your real name and or is it a pseudonym that you have chosen for yourself? If you have chosen it as a public profile name, why? By that I mean, what does the word mean to you?
I’m interested because it is also the name of a revolutionary newspaper founded by Vladimir Lenin in 1900 which played a significant role in Russian socialist/communist movements; and I was interested to know whether you were virtue signalling or perhaps advertising your political stance.
Why is your politics a relevant factor? Because it is my experience that anti-Jewish rhetoric and propaganda most often comes from the hard left (socialism) to far left (communism) of politics, both historically and today. Fascism, for example, evolved out of communist/socialist movements. Nazism, Hitler’s version of fascism, came from a socialist political stance. And since 2020, we have witnessed Islamists (although they cannot be described as on the far left of politics but who “live” to destroy the Jews) openly support far left causes, e.g. Black Lives Matter, hoping for reciprocal support in the the future I guess.
As you may be aware, communism and socialism relies heavily on propaganda and brainwashing techniques to manipulate the minds of what will become their activists to go against their natural instincts of standing up for equality, and individual rights and freedoms (individualism) in favour of the “common good” (collectivism). And at their core, communist/socialist movements are anti-God, one of their aims is to remove faith in God and replace God with religious reverence for the communist dictator.
Hard to far left (socialist/communist) sources of information are, to varying degrees, always activism (pushing a narrative or ideology); we should bear that in mind when we read, watch or listen to them.
As much as I have loads of respect for you and your relentless efforts to break everything down to avoid antisemitism or hate of any sort, but I seemed not to overlook the fact that you missed an interesting point in your final analysis when you attempted to correlate antisemitic propaganda of the early 20th century merely to socialism and communism, so what of Henry Ford and his ilk? Jewish conspiracy is a cosmopolitan phenomenon that mustn’t be relegated into the fringes of socialist( whether right or left) realms. Its omnipresence is readily felt from imperial Russia to socialist Germany, from capitalist gentile Henry Ford to his counterpart jew Benjamin Freedman.
The first soviet government was 99% Jewish.
Jacob Rothschild at B’nai B’rith World Center-Jerusalem Helps Mark 100th Anniversary of the Balfour Declaration:
https://archive.org/details/vlc-record-2020-01-02-15h31m36s-B
https://warprofiteerstory.blogspot.com/p/war-profiteers-and-israels-bank.html
[…] ¿Qué dijo Allen sobre los judíos? […]
Hi Rhoda, do you think Q might be able to do something regarding these evil people as they say they are trying and apparently in the process of doing, like ending Federal reserve etc.?