Breaking News

Disabled? Then you’re not welcome in Morrisons…or Sainsbury’s…or Asda

Please share our story!

Morrisons and Sainsbury’s have announced they will BAN customers who refuse to wear face covering’s.

Morrisons Chief Executive David Potts said – “From today we are further strengthening our policy on masks.” Pots also added that security guards at the UK’s fourth-biggest supermarket chain will be enforcing the new rules.

He stated “Those who are offered a face covering and decline to wear one won’t be allowed to shop at Morrisons unless they are medically exempt.”

Morrisons Review - Which?

Sainsbury’s Chief Executive Simon Roberts said Sainsbury’s would be putting trained security guards at the front of its stores to “challenge shoppers” who do not comply. He continued by saying – “I’ve spent a lot of time in our stores reviewing the latest situation over the last few days and on behalf of all my colleagues, I am asking our customers to help us keep everyone safe.

“The vast majority of customers are shopping safely, but I have also seen some customers trying to shop without a mask and shopping in larger family groups.

“Please help us to keep all our colleagues and customers safe by always wearing a mask and by shopping alone. Everyone’s care and consideration matters now more than ever.”

Sainsbury's shares boosted as Asda merger gets a step closer | News | The  Grocer

Asda have also announced that they will extend their Covid Marshals hours to ensure compliance with the draconian, unscientific rules.

So that’s 3 of the UK’s major supermarkets who are essentially now saying you’re not welcome if you have any form of disability. Which equates to 1 in 6 people who are now not welcome in the large supermarket stores.

The UK seems to be moving further into what has come a fusion of fascism and communism, and we’ve a feeling it’s only going to get worse.

It’s important to remember your rights if you happen to be confronted by one of these Covid Marshals when you go out to do your weekly shop. So we’ve done the hard work for you and found everything you need to know.

The current statutory instrument in place directing the wearing of face coverings in shops is ‘The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Wearing of Face Coverings in a Relevant Place) (England) Regulations 2020’. This statutory instrument states that ‘No person may, without reasonable excuse, enter or remain within a relevant place without wearing a face covering.’ So the question is, what is a reasonable excuse? Well the statutory instrument (vaguely the law) states the following –

‘For the purposes of regulation 3(1), the circumstances in which a person (“P”) has a reasonable excuse include those where—

(a)P cannot put on, wear or remove a face covering—

(i)because of any physical or mental illness or impairment, or disability (within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010(1)), or

(ii)without severe distress;’

So here we have written in law the reasonable excuses for not wearing a face covering. Now we would argue that conforming to terrible science and wearing a face covering is enough to cause anyone severe distress, but you’re free to do as you please.

Now Morrisons and Sainsbury’s have stated they will have security guards at the door now who will “challenge” shoppers if they are not wearing a face covering. Well we are pleased to inform you that they have no legal right to “challenge” you. There is absolutely nothing written in the above statutory instrument that says anyone is allowed to challenge you for not wearing a face covering, however the Government’s own guidance on the law states this –

‘If you have an age, health or disability reason for not wearing a face covering:

  • you do not routinely need to show any written evidence of this
  • you do not need show an exemption card

This means that you do not need to seek advice or request a letter from a medical professional about your reason for not wearing a face covering.

Carrying an exemption card or badge is a personal choice and is not required by law.’

The Government’s own interpretation of their law clearly states you do not have to prove your exemption from wearing a face covering. So therefore these security guards and Covid enforcement officers have no legal right to challenge you and you do not legally have to give them any form of excuse or exemption.

There is another law that is on the “exempts” side, and that is ‘The Equality Act 2010’. The act essentially makes service providers (i.e. shops) liable in civil claims for acts of disability discrimination against members of the public. So with ‘The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Wearing of Face Coverings in a Relevant Place) (England) Regulations 2020’ stating you do not have to wear one if exempt, and the Government’s own interpretation of the law stating you do not have to prove you are exempt, a denial of entry to Morrisons or Sainsbury’s because the words “I am exempt” are not enough, for the power hungry security guards and Covid enforcement officers, could be classed as discrimination and result in a hefty fine for the supermarkets.


We need your support! – If everyone reading this donated you could keep The Daily Expose going for another year and enable us to uphold our commitment to bring you the facts that the mainstream refuse to.

Please click the red button to donate via PayPal.

The Anatomy of a Perfect Call to Action & Why they are Critical for Site Conversions - Inbound Now - November 5, 2013
New study shows ivermectin shrinks brain tumours by 70%
Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive type of primary malignant brain …
Matt Goodwin: Afghans and Eritreans are 22-30 times more likely to commit sexual offences in UK
Research shows that foreign nationals, especially those from certain countries, are more …
UK Online Safety Act: Ofcom has opened a Transatlantic Can of Worms
The UK's Online Safety Act has sparked a transatlantic dispute over free …
Europe’s “philosopher queens” have led the continent into crisis
Europe's "philosopher queens," including Angela Merkel and Ursula von der Leyen, have …
Hamas’ atrocities against Gazans continue; Why aren’t the “pro-Palestinians” protesting?
Hamas continues to commit atrocities in Gaza.  Last week, videos were circulated …
Rumble is restored for French users after landmark win in court
Rumble has successfully regained full access to its platform in France following …
Political Prisoner Reiner Fuellmich must be released now!
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich was kidnapped from Mexico in October 2023, taken to …
Portugal Bans Burqa: Is It Really About Women’s Rights?
Portugal has just approved a nationwide ban on full face coverings in …
AI Industry’s Illegal $1 Trillion Funding Loop: Here’s What’s Really Happening
AI is the new gold rush, but the money isn’t moving how …
UN relentlessly propagates fear about man-made climate change to grasp control
The United Nations has again been spreading misinformation and hyperbole, particularly regarding …
UN to impose a carbon tax on shipping that could double fuel costs for cargo ships – China wins, the rest of the world loses, but Trump is fighting back
The UN’s International Maritime Organisation is set to impose a carbon tax …
New Zealand: Biotechnology experiments should be outlawed
The New Zealand government is considering a Gene Technology Bill that would …
Questions to ask your doctor about vaccination
Vaccines are unsafe and worthless, Dr. Vernon Coleman says.  He accepts that …
China intends to build a spy centre beneath proposed super embassy in London
Dominic Cummings has accused Britain's top officials, politicians and a legal firm …
The public is being psychologically prepared for a great and terrible war
J.B. Shurk believes the public is being psychologically manipulated and prepared for …
A new study: The Legal Foundations of Israel and the Origins of the Name “Palestine”
Last week, the Centre for the Study of Political Islam International released …

Please share our story!

Categories: Breaking News

Tagged as:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments