Breaking News

Letter Template to Raise Objection to the Proposed Pandemic Treaty of the World Health Organisation

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The proposed International Treaty on Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness builds on the growing reach of the International Health Regulations, in transferring more power to the World Health Organisation (WHO) to declare emergencies and then require countries, under treaty obligations, to follow WHO instructions.

Download the letter of objection to WHO’s pandemic treaty to send to your government representative HERE.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


by Dr David Bell

The WHO is a branch of the United Nations, set up in the late 1940s to support countries in managing various aspects of health. It was intended to be subject to control by member states, taking its instructions from the World Health Assembly which is made up of health ministers of member states. However, although it was originally funded by member states, it has become increasingly dependent on funding from private foundations, and corporations, particularly those heavily involved in, or invested in, the pharmaceutical industry.

In parallel with the increase in private funding, the WHO’s focus has shifted increasingly from community-based interventions to pharmaceutical-based interventions. Sister organisations tied closely to the WHO, including the Gavi Alliance and Cepi, are also concentrated almost solely on pharmaceutical approaches. Like the WHO, they are also partly funded by taxpayers through aid budgets but heavily influenced by Pharma.

WHO staff are recruited according to national quotas, technical qualifications but also personal networks. The Director-General is appointed by the vote of the health ministers, subject to international lobbying, every 4 years. As WHO staff receive relatively high rates of pay and benefits for the health sector, many spend the bulk of their career in the organisation and so gain minimal external experience.

While the WHO itself has noted that pandemics are rare, recognising only 4 in the 120 years before 2020, Cepi is devoted entirely to pandemics.  Funding within the WHO has also shifted increasingly toward a pandemic focus, with an emphasis on pharmaceutical (vaccine) approaches. A permanent international industry has been developed, at considerable cost, to deal with a rare problem that now depends on the declaration of new ‘pandemics’ to justify its existence.

In the context of Covid-19, it is clear that vaccine-based interventions are having a limited impact on overall outcomes, while other unprecedented interventions promoted by the WHO, against their own former pandemic guidance, have had major negative impacts on all aspects of society, including economies (massively increasing poverty), healthcare and education.

This proposed treaty raises a number of fundamental concerns that we believe should lead to its immediate abandonment:

1.    Countries (people) will lose sovereignty over major aspects of daily life to unelected international bureaucrats, who are subject to significant conflicts of interest from private individuals and industry.

2.    These WHO bureaucrats will decide on the criteria for and timing of such take-overs.

3.    The track record of the WHO in managing international outbreaks is poor. It is inherently dangerous to delegate control over complex issues that heavily impact the economy, society and public health to individuals in a distant location with no community or relevant national affiliations, and no direct stake in the outcomes.

4.    Such centralization is contrary to the fundamental pillars of community-based, locally organised healthcare, and antithetical to the principles of individual rights and autonomy upon which the WHO’s constitution is based.

5.    The increasing emphasis on pandemics instead of on the actual major causes of human illness and mortality is inappropriate, and the diversion of funds and activity will have hugely negative impacts on overall population and individual health.

The world needs international forums for sharing data, for concentrating technical expertise to support countries lacking these and to facilitate discussions between countries concerning health issues, including emergencies. Such organisations must be in service of member countries and their people, not act as unelected authorities, funded and influenced by conflicted, non-national interests that attempt to direct and control the lives of free citizens.

Please use the letter below as a template to write to your Member(s) of Parliament to alert them to your concerns regarding the proposed WHO pandemic treaty. The letter is intended to stimulate discussion within parliaments on key issues. The concerns raised should be relevant irrespective of the attitudes of the Member to efficacy of various aspects of the Covid-19 response.

It is essential that debate moves on from disagreement on specific public health interventions, and addresses the longer term issues of sovereignty and risks of conflict of interest. There are ways for countries to cooperate together in public health without subverting laws and democratic processes that many have fought to achieve over previous centuries.

You can download this letter, as copied below, to send to your government representative HERE (word document).

Letter Template

Dear  _______

We respectfully raise the critical issue of the proposed International Treaty on Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness [1] currently under negotiation by the Government and other member states of the World Health Organisation (WHO). We call on you to oppose this treaty by raising this issue in Parliament, demanding debate and open review, in the interests of preserving national sovereignty and individual rights.

This proposed treaty seeks to impose WHO dictates in place of national sovereignty and the rights of an individual to make choices regarding their own body and health, and is demonstrably inappropriate and disproportionate from a public health viewpoint.

Basic principles governing public health

The breadth of factors impacting an individual’s health, and the importance of personal, community and national control over health, are reflected in principles previously accepted by the World Health Organisation:

Definition of health: Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. (Constitution of the WHO, 1946) [2]

Informed opinion and active co-operation on the part of the public are of the utmost importance in the improvement of the health of the people. (Constitution of the WHO, 1946) [2]

The people have the right and duty to participate individually and collectively in the planning and implementation of their health care. (Article IV, Declaration of Alma Ata, 1978) [3]

The UN Declaration of Human Rights [4], 1948, also supports the fundamental rights of the individual: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.

Public health priority of pandemics

Pandemics severely affecting a high proportion of younger and middle-aged people have not occurred since the pre-antibiotic era (1918-20), when a majority of deaths were considered to be due to secondary bacterial [5] infections. The WHO lists only four pandemics [6] in the 120 years prior to Covid-19; 1918-19, 1957-58, 1968-69, and 2009-10, with only 1918-19 causing more than 1.1 million deaths. Severe pandemics are rare events. The Covid-19 pandemic, whilst resulting in considerable disruption and collateral harm, resulted in mortality at an average age [7] similar to that of all-cause mortality, with severity concentrated within clearly identifiable population groups [8].

The diversion of resources and various mitigation measures used mostly unsuccessfully during the Covid-19 public health response are demonstrated to have had a considerable negative impact on the economy and healthcare access. This underlines the importance of local control and prioritisation in time of disease outbreaks to ensure long-term harms do not outweigh intended short-term benefit.

Proposed treaty

A special session of the World Health Assembly from 29 November – 1 December 2021 [9] commenced a consultation process with the WHO member states that aims to develop, for the first time, a binding International Treaty on Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness that could override and subvert national sovereignty and decision-making on responses to disease outbreaks that the WHO classifies as ‘pandemics’. This could provide WHO staff the power to override democratic norms in countries and supersede community consultation processes, and govern the right to work, to travel, to pursue an education, and to interact with family and community and undertake religious observance, income, trade, and other basic human rights previously supported in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and under national and common law.

The definition of ‘pandemic’ used by the WHO is arbitrary [10], leaving the decision to subvert national sovereignty potentially at the whim of individual interpretation.

The importance of local and national sovereignty

The WHO was set up after World War II as a body to serve countries, governed by them, and not as a body that would govern the actions of member states. Our laws and process of governance have developed over centuries to protect the rights of individuals and to preserve national sovereignty at the will of the people. It is imperative that those setting policy and rules on complex issues have a direct stake in the outcomes.

We therefore request that steps be taken urgently to review the sovereignty and health issues that are at risk through the process currently under way, and to ensure that the role of the WHO, and other international organisations, remains strictly advisory and technical, whilst all decisions affecting citizens remain within the ambit of local and national government as well as the individuals themselves.

Sincerely,

Sign your name here

Letter References

  1. Council of the European Union, An international treaty on pandemic prevention and preparedness, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/coronavirus/pandemic-treaty/
  2. WHO, Constitution of the World Health Organization, https://apps.who.int/gb/bd/pdf_files/BD_49th-en.pdf#page=6
  3. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/documents/almaata-declaration-en.pdf?sfvrsn=7b3c2167_2
  4. International Conference on Primary Health Care, Declaration of Alma-Ata, https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
  5. National Institutes of Health, Bacterial Pneumonia Caused Most Deaths in 1918 Influenza Pandemic, https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/bacterial-pneumonia-caused-most-deaths-1918-influenza-pandemic
  6. WHO, Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329438/9789241516839-eng.pdf?ua=1
  7. Office for National Statistics, UK, Average age of those who had died with COVID-19, https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/averageageofthosewhohaddiedwithcovid19
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA, People with Certain Medical Conditions, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html
  9. WHO, Special session of World Health Assembly 29 November 2021 – 1 December 2021, https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2021/11/29/default-calendar/second-special-session-of-the-world-health-assembly
  10. WHO, Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329438/9789241516839-eng.pdf?ua=1
Share this page to Telegram
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

29 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Diane
Diane
4 months ago

Writing a letter is like asking psychopaths to stop abusing you. These psychopaths need to be executed and stopped by whatever means necessary.

mcc
mcc
Reply to  Diane
4 months ago

true but i feel we should still go through the motions so they canm’t say we never objected.
Disobedience is our only real weapon though

nagele
nagele
Reply to  mcc
4 months ago

which is made up of health ministers of member states. However, although it was originally funded by member states, it has become increasingly dependent on funding from private foundations, and corporations, particularly those heavily involved in, or invested in, the pharmaceutical industry.

sayotox929
sayotox929
Reply to  nagele
4 months ago

> Writing a letter is like asking psychopaths to stop abusing you. These psychopaths need to be executed and stopped by whatever means necessary.
LOL. That’s exactly what I was going to write.

nagele
nagele
Reply to  mcc
4 months ago

 pursue an education, and to interact with family and community and undertake religious observance, income, trade, and other basic human rights previously supported in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and under national and common law.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  nagele
4 months ago

First they should be educated like:

  1. Governments lie, politicians lie, MSM lies.
  2. The true nature of illnesses and how they were used in past for political reasons or simply to make big money like made up “diseases” (rabies), poisoning disguised as disease (AIDS, Polio)

They shouldn’t over fear diseases, because the fear what helps them to ‘sell’ every BS to to the people and fear paralyzes minds to think srtraight.
Eleanor McBean’s The Poisoned Needle is a must to read and know (history of their diseases, vaccines and lies with documented proofs) freely available on w. h. a. l. e. d. o. t. t. o

Make aware people please about the newest lie, monkey pox. It is syphilis, feel free to compare the photos. Here is another one, about a person ill with syphilis.
DON’T LET THEM USE IT AS A BASE OF THE WHO TREATY, that it is necessary to stop ‘viral’ pandemics.

syphillisJPG.JPG
nagele
nagele
Reply to  mcc
4 months ago

World Health Assembly which is made up of health ministers of member states. However, although it was originally funded by member states, it has become increasingly dependent on funding from private foundations, and corporations, particularly those heavily involved in, or invested in, the pharmaceutical industry.

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
Reply to  mcc
4 months ago

They don’t care what you say.
Or if you objected.
They just jabbed billions with a bio weapon ffs

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Paul Watson
4 months ago

They can’t do it again. Maybe with force but not willingly. A part of the people maybe, but never again this amount. It looks to me that their lies successfully killed their vaccine business. I mean what would make anyone think that if they lied about these vaxxes, they haven’t lied about others?

The other – very likely made up story – is the children’ liver disease. It is poisoning. But while people tend to assume that it is because of parents’ shedding or the child was old enough to be vaxxed with a covid vax, graphene oxide was found in a vax which is regularly given to babies and infants.
Here is the article about it with proof:
La Quinta Columna: Graphene Oxide Found in PCV, a Regularly Scheduled Infant & Toddler Vaccination Against Pneumococcal Infections“https://truthcomestolight.com/la-quinta-columna-graphene-oxide-found-in-pcv-a-regularly-scheduled-infant-toddler-vaccination-against-pneumococcal-infections/

talking time is over
talking time is over
Reply to  mcc
4 months ago

> Disobedience is our only real weapon though

Only if you’re a coward. Guns, knives, molotov cocktails, stones, even your bare hands, all are better than “disobedience”. What are you, their child?

Last edited 4 months ago by talking time is over
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  talking time is over
4 months ago

It would be a kamikaze ‘war’ but I agree if the masses can’t stop them, we surely won’t let ourselves to dragged to a camp or forced to (delivery tool) tested or vaxxed without resistance.

kane
kane
Reply to  Diane
4 months ago

> Writing a letter is like asking psychopaths to stop abusing you. These psychopaths need to be executed and stopped by whatever means necessary.

LOL. That’s exactly what I was going to write.

Tonia
Tonia
Reply to  Diane
4 months ago

True, however our silence is our consent when dealing with cooperations under their system. 99% of living men & women have no idea the trickery these cooperations masquerading as our governments have woven & the lies they have perpetrated & language they have hidden in plain sight.
Black Laws Dictionary is what they use & in terms they speak.
Cooperations have no power over living men & women, but 99% humans have no idea that the birth certificate your parents sighed is the contract between you & the cooperation masquerading as your government under Maritime law.
Notice how that name is always written in capital letters? That’s the Strawman.
The illegal fiction the cooperation has taken from the certificate & trades on it (you). Fidelity dot com is where you go to see how much you are worth to them.
Now, living breathing men & women under common law aka Law of the Land, trumps all their unlawful man made laws, but when dealing with a cooperation, every word you speak must come from a living man or womans mouth under Law of the Land and to do that, you need to understand every word in the Blacks Law Dictionary.
I have registered my live birth under Law of the Land & claimed the Strawman.
Sovereignty comes from your birth right under God, the true creator. He bestowed every living man & woman these inalienable rights but most have forgotten or never known that, because we have turned our backs on God & allowed ourselves to be deceived by His enemy, the father of lies, that serpent with rhe forked tongue.
Those that didn’t do their homework thoroughly, enough, or maybe they didn’t hear them say that the jab was experimental gene therapy. Gene therapy aka changes your God given DNA.
No longer born in the image of God, an now a hybrid or a genetically modified human.
And any plant, animal or human that is genetically modified is owned by the person who holds the patent on the drug that genetically modified them.
All this was foretold in Revelations.
The mark of the beast is the jab. Those who took it have wavered their inable rights unfortunately.
As for those who didn’t take the jab, we are to be persecuted for not bowing to the beast.
Time has run out for humanity.
The seals have been broken.
Tribulation has begun.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Diane
4 months ago

They will try something, I don’t think they can get away with all of this and they made mistakes after mistakes, right now they try to use syphilis as a viral disease under the name of monkey pox.
There won’t be nuclear war as they won’t ruin “their lands” but anything else is possible.

About monkey pox, check the photos on google images about syphilis, here is one. (I haven’t read after it yet, but as far as I remember, it’s bacterial and can be treated with antibiotics, also it started with the small-pox vaccination back then….)
Now have a look at DM’ photos (and strictly moderated articles about the newest “viral pandemic” threat).

syphillis1.JPG
Last edited 4 months ago by GundelP
Geraldina
Geraldina
Reply to  GundelP
4 months ago

Bad AIDS.

Geraldina
Geraldina
4 months ago

The U.S. Constitution stands in the way of this agenda, as do the constitutions of many other countries. Because of this, the WHO World Health Assembly is convening on May 22 to vote on abolishing all nation-states and merging them into a global governance structure in which the WHO makes everyone’s medical decisions.
.
.
https://greatreset.news/2022-04-28-who-to-strip-us-other-countries-sovereignty.html
.
.
“If they are approved (as submitted by the United States) by a simple majority of the 194 member countries of the World Health Assembly countries, these amendments would enter into force as international law just six months later (November 2022),” warned En-Volve.com about how soon this could all transpire.
.
.
You better get those letters off to your MP’s double-FAST!!!

Last edited 4 months ago by geraldina07
transgender or bust
transgender or bust
Reply to  Geraldina
4 months ago

> The U.S. Constitution stands in the way of this agenda, as do the constitutions of many other countries

I’m pretty sure no other country has a constitution, The uk has toilet paper that they call a constitution, but all that says is that the pedos in the palace can do to you what pedos always do and there’s nothing you can do about it. Even the US constitution isn’t worth spit now because you’ve got an organised crime boss with a whore son in the blight house. I heard they were going to make it compulsory to chop off your son’s penis and sew it onto your daughter.

Geraldina
Geraldina
Reply to  transgender or bust
4 months ago

Well they’ve already sewn it on to your head after all.

trackback
4 months ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
4 months ago

Like voting its a pointless exercise..

kane
kane
4 months ago

The WHO belongs to bill gates. He’s the primary donator. Your government belongs to bill gates. He’s the primary donator. Your government are fascist dictators.

Dear Mr Gates

Please stop poisoning us.

Yours,
A Citizen

There you go. Print, sign, post, incinerate.

Only the even slimier lawyers want to write letters. The only letter worth sending to government officials is a letter bomb.

Last edited 4 months ago by kane
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  kane
4 months ago

It belongs to him and WEF deeper than people would assume. Gates and Schwab both were knighted. (Wikipedia) It happened a year ago or so that the politicians, RF and business held a shiny party welcoming warmly Gates in the UK.
A smaller group of people was waiting for Gates’ car, shouting like murderer and similar, but the people at the top didn’t even blink.

Last edited 4 months ago by GundelP
Jeannie
Jeannie
4 months ago

I have to add, this treaty means nothing because of our 10th Amendment… our president can not just hand us over to a global goverance, this is a scare tactic they are using on us… WE the people have that right to say no to the WHO take over…and besides, we all have guns and will not depart from them, they will have to pry our dead lifeless fingers from them Amen?

#10
#10
Reply to  Jeannie
4 months ago

You’re already under a global governance. Who do you think is flooding your country with immigransts? Who do you think is injecting your people with j*w juice? Who do you think is sending your children to die in yet another war? Who do you think has emptied your coffers? It ain’t “Mr President”.

trackback
4 months ago

[…] Read More: Letter Template to Raise Objection to the Proposed Pandemic Treaty of the World Health Or… […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] At the end of Jasmine Birtles’ article published on News Uncut, HERE, is a template you can use to contact your MP.  You can also use the template from a previous The Exposé article, HERE. […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] At the end of Jasmine Birtles’ article published on News Uncut, HERE, is a template you can use to contact your MP.  You can also use the template from a previous The Exposé article, HERE. […]