Latest UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report figures on Covid cases show that doubly vaccinated 40-70 year olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people. Their immune systems are deteriorating at around 5% per week (between 2.7% and 8.7%). If this continues then 30-50 year olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defence by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year.
By a concerned reader
The 5 PHE tables below from their excellent Vaccine Surveillance Report, separated by 4 weeks, clearly show the progressive damage that the vaccines are doing to the immune system’s response.
People aged 40-69 have already lost 40% of their immune system capability and are losing it progressively at 3.3% to 6.4% per week.
Weekly Decline in doubly vaccinated immune system performance compared to unvaccinated people…
Everybody over 30 will have lost 100% of their entire immune capability (for viruses and certain cancers) within 6 months.
30-50 year olds will have lost it by Christmas. These people will then effectively have full blown acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and destroy the NHS.
The vaccine booster shots have to be the same as the vaccines themselves, because it takes forever to do clinical trials and get approval for something different. So if you take a booster shot, these figures show that you are giving yourself an even faster progressive form of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (after a couple of months of effectiveness).
Table 2. COVID-19 cases by vaccination status…
Cases reported by specimen date between week 32 and week 35 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1016465/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_36.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 33 and week 36 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1018416/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_37_v2.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 34 and week 37 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1019992/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_38.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 35 and week 38 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1022238/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_39.pdf
Cases reported by specimen date between week 36 and week 39 2021 – https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1023849/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_40.pdf
Pfizer originally claimed a 95% efficiency for their vaccine (calculated as in the last column above). The figures above indicate that their figures may well have been correct immediately after vaccination (the younger age groups have had the vaccine for the shortest time).
But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination For more see here.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?
So glad someone is speaking about this. I have been digging deep into this and this is exactly the case. This one article from NIH I came across from 2006 Towards a coronavirus-based HIV multigene vaccine https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2270750/pdf/CDI-13-353.pdf The only active ingredient in the pfizer vaccine is the Mrna and that is genetic material and that material is HIV is what I believe.
2002: April 19: The University of North Carolina files US patent 7279327 for an infectious replication defective coronavirus (to be used as a virus vector for an HIV vaccine), claiming priority from US28531801P. Inventors were: Kristopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, Ralph S. Baric
Link the f*cking report for journalisms sake.
All 5 PHE reports are linked in the article. They are the the pdfs above each of the 5 tables.
The data in the PHE’s reports don’t seem to be related to whatever the heck the tables in this article are posing.
This is total bullshit and I’m as anti-covid-vax as it gets. You can’t say Pfizer said it’s 95% effective then see it’s 50% effective and say your whole immune system is 45% less effective and you had aids. There are so many problems with that logic I literally don’t know where to start.
But just start with this: the Pfizer number is BULLSHIT.
Has nothing to do with any disease other than COVID, and certainly nothing to do with cancer. The authors of this piece should be ashamed of themselves for inventing this lie out of whole cloth.
https://vk.com/video644727407_456239065
The RedCross officially banned convalescent plasma donations from the vaccinated because it lowers anti-body counts by 5-6x, effectively making their blood incapable of treating COVID patients. https://www.bitchute.com/video/9G8QKEky4dzT/
I am curious, because I know plenty of people who jumped at jab as soon as it came out and they are so perfectly healthy after 6 months so far …and winter…
It’s very likely they received a placebo.
The problem with that is that if they go out to get another one,
they won’t be so lucky the next few times. They couldn’t murder everyone at once, so they threw in a lot of placebos.
Many scientists examining vials found pure saline in many vials.
This report doesn’t show a direct loss in immune system – only blood tests can show that. This report only shows the increasing rate of the jabbed going on to test positive. But this is obvious since the jab is the virus.
Exactly, I looked over the scanned documents and found nothing on the vaccines’ effect on immunological function. Where did the Expose get this data? Where did they measure immune function? Please supply the links if they are indeed available. Unless one can support these conclusions with data then you’re not helping the cause of those of us who are opposed to vaccine mandates and the vaccine itself.
Agreed, this article is not backed by the data put forward, but such data do indeed exist. Pathologist, Dr. Ryan Cole in the US and others have shown decreased numbers in blood tests of immunological parameters such as NK killer Cells, T-lymphocytes, CD4+/CD8+ (causing AIDS situation) in jabbed individuals.
PHE is a statstics outfit. It is not a immunological outfit. Of course there is nothing on immunology from them. But their figures show that vaccines now suppress your immune response to Covid rather than boosting it. The measure of that suppression is the ratio of normalised vaxxed vs unvaxxed case numbers. This is what Pfizer used in the first place and nobody argued with it then. Why do people argue with it now that the numbers are reversed? What do you think is causing this reversal of a magnitude which is increasing week on week? It is quite obviously a deteroriation in immune capability in the vaxxed when compared to the unvaxxed. And it is getting more and more pronounced very week. That is a form of Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency. The immune systems of the vaxxed are deficient when compared immune systems of the unvaxxed. That means one of two things. Either the unvaxxed are getting better and better immune systems for no reason having had no intervention. Or the vaxxed are getting worse and worse immune systems due to the intervention they have had, which intervention was the vaccine.
Please, next time post a more detailed explanation of the logic that lead to your conclusion. I had to read this comment to better understand your train of thought and it does make sense. If the injectable concoction would just stop working, then the number of cases in both V and U should be the same, but instead those in V are starting to be double those in U.
Regarding this, care to expand on the formula used? It’s kind of counterintuitive to have a 50% decrease that results in double the number of cases. It should be 100%. I know it measures the concoction’s efficiency, not the number of cases, but why did Pfizer use that formula?
I also assumed you are the one who wrote this article based on one of your other comments. I would like to thank you for this important insight.
Yes that is it. Sorry I am a mathematician. So it was obvious to me. You are quite right. I spend a lot of time explaining what I omitted from the article. But yes, the media line is oh the vaccines are just loosing their efficetiveness. But the figures tell a very different story. As you say V would slowly approach U if the vaccines were merely stopping working and losing effectiveness. But V charged towards U and then went above U and is continuing to go further and further above U at an alarming rate. The Pfizer formula just measures efficiency (positive or negative) such that the highest efficiency is 100% and the lowest is -100%. The former representing total immunity and the latter representing no immune capability at all against Covid (compared to unvaxxed people). I am just using Pfizer’s own formula against their product. If you say that double the number of vaxxed cases should be a -100% efficency then you have destroyed the immume system a little early!!
I thank you for taking the time and doing the research properly to understand the key result which is that when V goes signficantly higher than U, the vaccines have not stopped working. They are still very much working. But working negatively!
Given your title, think about what the Mayo clinic first published in Feb 2020: The Corona of spike proteins is a crown of thorns. The last indignity meted out to our lord. But the soldiers braided/platted the crown in Matthew27, Mark15 and John18. And a plat is a double or multiple helix (like DNA). So I have always known that Covid is a gene spliced man made military bioweapon. This is now more generally accepted from secular evidence.
Pfizer’s own research scientist, David Bauer, stated publicly months ago that double vaxxed had 1/6 the natural immune system. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/finance-video/dr-david-bauer-pfizer-vaccine-produces-fewer-key-antibodies/vp-AAKHPO1
How about a link to the PHE report?
There are 5 such links above teh 5 tables. They are teh 5 pdfs
Your first two paragraphs are full of lies and it is clear you are trying to deceive your readers. The NIH report you reference does not contain the far right columns in your article – they have been inserted by someone who knows nothing about immunology or public health. Read the NIH report – there is absolutely nothing about the entire human immune system being degraded as a result of administration of the COVID-19 vaccine. This is made up and is a lie. If you had any integrity, you would take these lies down.
Who’d have thought the far right would be wrong 😀
It is not an NIH report. It is a PHE report. I studied Cell Biology at Cambridge University in the UK actually. What qualifications do you have?
It was my integrity that led me to put the results up. The far right columns are an application of Pfizer’s own effectiveness formula for vaccines, the one they used to claim 95% vaccine efficiency. If your comment had any validity (which it does not) then Pfizer also would have no knowldge of immunology or public health. You are not interested in integrity. You are interested in suppression of the truth with patently false accusations of dishonesty
If that’s the case, there is no point of arguing with troll.. update the article with above information to give more clarity to your readers by link to Pfizer official page where they published the formula.
Here is another research, raising similar concerns.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-020-00789-5
The very last word of the article “here” is a link to an expose article which goes into the Pfizer formula in more detail. But you are right – it would have saved me a lot of time in post article explanations!
What’s the difference? Why bash the right? It’s the logical conclusion. The virus uses your defenses against you. Like Malaria.
exactly, your calculations on the right are correct but only show immunology for covid cases between vaccinated and unvaccinated
I looked at the links provided above each table and there is no data matching your tables in the reports. This becomes obvious when you use the word “Vax” in the table, no government agency would do that. I can see why you have been banned.
The data is Table2 in each of the 5 reports. I abbreviated the word vaccine to save space Sherlock.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/F6CcMvB0dpXw/
What worries me, is the old will have no defense? Is that right?
Not entirely. The old are losing their immunity more slowly. It is a bit like a cancer in an old person. It grows more slowly. The group most at risk is 30-50 year olds according to this data. Also it is not known how specific the loss of immunity is. Is it just Covid19? Is it all coronaviruses – all flu infections? Is it all viruses? The thing to look out for is increases in Shingles, HPV, Herpes labialis, Epstein Barr etc. It depends how much of the immune system is compromised. On the other hand what happens when the deterioration reaches 100%? Does it then attack other parts of the immune system or body. Or does the damage stop there?
Please watch the movie COLD CASE DAG HAMMARSKJOLD.
It begins as an investigation of an assassination, but veers off, almost immediately into the HIV/AIDS eugenics program run in Africa by the Royal Family, Mossad, and US Cohorts like Fauci, etc.
It shows how they used free vaccines at clinics to destroy people’s immune system. It was a military operation. Those who spoke out about it were murdered.
If you understand history, you understand that they are running the same program again. This time, it’s the entire world they are going after. AND, they are more advanced this time around with the technology and mind control frequencies.
I knew about the AIDS eugenics program from a friend of mine from Kenya who told me stories about what happened.
Ever wonder why you’d read news headlines about Africans murdering WHO health workers or burning down clinics?
Remember thinking, “What is wrong with these people?”
Well, now you understand why they don’t tolerate the WHO and globalist medical mafia. They are much more wise than majority of people in the Western World.
With the comparison reports at https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/10/comparison-reports-proves-vaccinated-developing-ade/
Your site claims there is degraded immunity occurring in vaccinated people. You cite the weekly “Vaccine Surveillance Report” from Public Health England as the source. But I’ve looked at some of those reports, and they are making no mention of degraded immune system capability.
Can you please point me to any official source of information to support the claim that the vaccines are degrading immunity?
Correct. The best you will get from PHE is “In individuals aged greater than 30, the rate of positive COVID-19 test is higher in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated”. – PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 41.
The govt are not going to offically say that vaccines damage the immune system. They officially say that vaccines are safe and effective. But they are plainly no longer effective because we now have twice as many cases per 100k in certain age groups in the vaxxed as we do in the unvaxxed. Neither are they safe. But you will hear no govt department utter those words because they are in the business of pushing vaccines. But you or I can apply Pfizer’s vaccine efficacy formula to the data and get the result for ourselves that is displayed in column 10. We can see that the vaccines are no longer boosting the immune system (green numbers in tables) but are suppressing it/damaging it/causing it to deteriorate (red numbers in tables). They are doing this at a fairly constant rate more and more each week. I appreciate this is not something people want to hear. But all credit to PHE for producing such claar and precise results from such a huge amount of delta sequencing. Remember the words of Dustin Hoffman at an award ceremony. Always leave a little for the audience to do themselves.
This was already forewarned and discussed by the professors here :
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MqGw27daj37K/
There were many publications outlinning the C-19 vaccines had strains of HIV present – so this news you are now presenting comes at no surprise … obvisuly such medical professionals were banned and removed off YouTube after over 2 millions viewers so main stream media gaints took down their fore-warnings:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MqGw27daj37K/
Australian news site says get ready for mass resignations in the workforce….more likely mass deaths and disabilities.
HOW TO YOU GET THE FIGURES IN THE LAST COLUMN OF THE DATA TABLE ON WHICH YOU BASE YOUR CONCLUSIONS AS THOSE FIGURES ARE NOT REPORTED IN THE UK GOVERNMENT VACCINE SURVEILLANCEREPORT WEEK 39 AND 40
What form of measurement is used to test the degradation of the immune system? Can they measure all the different parts of the system, like T cells and so on? Please detail the way this is being tested. Thank you.
Immune system degradation is deduced from the vaxxed verses unvaxxed case numbers using Pfizer’s vaccine efficiency formula as described in the response above. A negative vaccine efficiency means the vaccine is damaging the immune system. A 100% negative vaccine efficiency means that the vaccine has completely wiped out the immune system of the doubly vaxxed (for covid19 at the least) when compared to the unvaxxed control group. I am doing this with maths not with biochemistry.
If you apply biochemistry the situation is even worse. Because vaccines do not lose their efficiency in 6 months. They alert the immune system, they train the immune system, and the immune system then produces the relevant antibodies and remembers the pathogen. It does not forget what it has been told 6 months ago. The only way the apparent efficiency of the vaccines can fall is if they damage the immune system so that it cannot act properly on the training that the vaccine has given it. This concept that vaccines are losing efficiency in months is nonsense, The vaccine’s training job is done after a couple of weeks.
Do you know what AIDS stands for?
A=acquired I=immune D=deficiency S=syndrome.
Acquired means it is not naturally produced. The first people who were infected were said to get the disease from African monkeys. It was something that “jumped” from species to species. So we were told.
Immunity is now in the mix because we need immunity from modern diseases; not vaccines that don’t do that!
Deficiency means “lack of.” We have a disease called AIDS that is known to reduce a person’s natural immunity so that even the weakest influenza or a light lung infection will stop them from breathing properly and they get weaker until they WILL DIE.
People do not die of AIDS, they die of even a simple disease that AIDS makes them susceptible to.
Now what is happening today? If we are given jabs that do not strengthen but weaken our immunity, are we more susceptible to many diseases that if we become weak enough, will actually kill us? The evidence is that many and I think most people do not die of Covid-19 but of weak forms of otherwise treatable or defeatable diseases. I think we should strengthen our immunity by taking medicines that will help us to be stronger and not take anything that may reduce our power to naturally fight diseases no matter what disease comes.
https://cfca4684-a3e3-4c00-a0f7-ce8c5aa289ff.filesusr.com/ugd/a9dba4_080872481b854dcea364505422b5e43b.pdf
I do not support the ‘vaccine’ at all but this is not a helpful article – the data quoted does not support the conclusion. The data effectively says that after having had boosted antibodies from the vaccine the amount of antibodies in a persons system fall off at a significant rate over time. This is to be expected and an entirely different thing from the effect on the immune system as a whole, which is not mentioned in the context of this data.
In addition, as I understand it, antibodies are a red herring – T-cell immunity is the key, this is relatively permanent – antibodies come and go and that is normal.
We do more harm than good to our cause by using inaccurate and unsupported inflammatory statements such as presented in this article.
This is interesting, but aren’t we jumping the gun here?
I decorticated the number of deaths for myself (week 40), recalculated their rate per 100000 people according to the population and vaccination rates per age group etc. I end up with even worse numbers or the unvaxed than the official document…
What the numbers show is that indeed, the vaxed are dying less than the unvaxed. They are also less hospitalised.
BUT, as this article shows, the vaxed get infected more often than the unvaxed.
That is interesting… So they end up being infected more, thus they will spread more, but are hospitalised less and die less.
It can mean many things, and immune suppression can be one of them, but then people would probably be hospitalised more and die more too, wouldn’t they?
It could also mean that vaxed people are more and more likely to behave unsafely and get the rona…
More digging required.
You also have to look at healthy user bias and how the CDC defines vaccinated. Reporters use partially vaccinated and unvaccinated interchangeably. Also, there is a statistical illusion because reports combine data from multiple months like April to July. In April and before that, not many were fully vaccinated so most deaths were from unvaccinated. If that is confusing, consider the following.. In October 2020, a vaccine didn’t exist so 100% deaths were in the unvaccinated. This does not mean the vaccine worked as a vaccine didn’t exist in October 2020.
You rally want your decision to take the shot to be validated in some way, any way, don’t you. I think you’ll find Gareth Hawker just below to be absolutely accurate in his summary. Best post here.
By which messages, numbers or reports are you so certain that the vaccinated are dying less? It makes no sense, as most people probably have had covid by now just by spreading it.. I had it in March right at the start, although I was very careful.
These numbers are manipulated. You are not considered vaxed untill 2 weeks after your second dose. Almost all deaths are within 48 hours of their second dose of the vaccine which are deemed to be unvaccinated deaths.
So you can’t admit the jab is a bad idea no matter what information is presented to you? I’d say you are in a cult but you don’t realize it yet.
I have checked a couple of the author’s calculations, and came up with the same result. But there is no need to calculate to get the gist.
Per 100,000, shortly after vaccines were given, more unvaccinated fell ill than vaccinated. As time went by, this was reversed.
The author draws a number of conclusions from this, about ADE etc. These are essentially speculation (albeit highly informed).
So the vaccine seems to do some good to begin with, then starts to harm, and gradually becomes even more harmful.
All this depends on the correct identification of a ‘case’, usually by PCR of LFT or both. The validity of these tests is much disputed.
However, accepting the government’s own criteria, the vaccines are soon worse than nothing, and become even more harmful by the week.
Best post here, and something that would have been identified had proper testing been even half done.
This graph shows all-cause mortality, so does not depend on questionable diagnosis. Unfortunately, the age groups are not separated.
https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/2021/09/all-cause-mortality-rates-in-england.html
This seems to suggest the people refusing vaccines are generally healthier, for whatever reasons, and the aggregate number of deaths is decreasing.
Interesting. But there’s another possible scenario here. Those who die from the vaccine could account more so for the later vaccinate spike in deaths rather than waning protection.
Plus it only goes to week 26. As the protection wanes on the vaccine we ought to see it reverse even more.
The orginal unvaccinated spike as stated appears to be just seasonal for almost everyone as not that many people have been vaccinated by week 6.
Sorry if Im missing it but I cannot find any data in your story or the linked surveillance reports that support – “Fully Vaccinated are developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome”.
If someone can pointit out to me id be greatful but at this stage it just seems to be an assumption and not fact
Yup, I’ve jhad a good look. The tables don’t marry with anything in the reports. I was passed then link by a clever boffin who doesn’t go down the rabbit hole. Manufactured and fake !!!
The first 9 columns in each of the 5 weekly tables are a direct copy from Table 2 or Table 4 of the 5 PHE reports. If you indeed had a look then you are blind.
You’re right. Those are direct copy. But the rest, i.e. the most important part that is related to immune system degredation is absent.
It’s a deduction made from the statistics which show vaccinated overtaking unvaccinated, step by step, in covid cases. All things equal, they would be the same. Therefore he’s making a presumption that something else could be going on and likely it is immune system suppression or something similar. But the vaccinated are dying less and hospitalised less, so it’s hard to form a conclusion. Unless the stats are being manipulated somehow???
Agree. Show me the study so I can read it myself.
While the Exposé article demonstrates that, according to PHE statistics, the proportion of the vaccinated who are falling ill is increasing, the Exposé explanation for why this is happening seems to be speculative rather than based on solid fact.
Here is a summary of a variety of explanations, with an indication of how the vaccinated can avert the worst of the vaccine’s bad effects. It is written by Dr Thomas E Levy MD JD:
https://orthomolecular.acemlna.com/lt.php?notrack=1&s=9827f7b932a79e016632c0bacd3fb58f&i=205A209A1A10301
You have got it. The sooner people start treating vaccine side effects be they immunological or cardio vascular or neuropathic, the better. We need to treat all vaccinated people as if they have long Covid
there maybe some variation in what is in each individual shot, some of them are just saline.
Do not take the Covid-19 Kill Shots period and that is final. These vaccines are deliberately scientifically engineered and designed to murder ALL of the “legal American Patriots” who voted for President Donald J Trump. Do not take the vaccines period and that is final.
I was cured from HSV-2 with no side effects. He also do love spell to bring back ex lover, he can fix marriage/relationship breakup.
Email; R.buckler @hotmail com
I highly recommend him to anyone suffering from
ORAL HERPES VIRUS,
HERPES ZOSTERS,
FIBROID,
PROSTATE ENLARGEMENT,
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION,
Where can we find the Formula used in this calculations. It is mentioned as Pfyzer formula but I was not able to find it anywhere. Please provide link to it. Thank you!
U-V/V if V>U and U-V/U if U>V. It is stated at the top of Column 10 which is the result of that formula. It is the normalised absolute ratio between the vaxxed (V) and the unvaxxed (U) case rates per capita.
Column 10 = (Column 9 – Column 8)/Column 9 if positive (U>V)
Column 10 = (Column 9 – Column 8)/Column 8 if negative (V>U)
yes I saw that before asking…….but where one can find that this formula is actually real one? It says (as per Pfyzer formula) but nowhere on Pfyzer site such formula or calculations can be found. Those calculations are only found here on this report not on the original PDF files linked to the UK data base.
I can’t share it on Facebook, as it gets censored. Facebook says it is false information
“It is also unclear where these percentages came from or how they were calculated, as the percentage figures do not appear anywhere in the reports that the article cited.”
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/10/fact-check-public-health-england-data-does-not-suggest-that-covid19-vaccines-cause-aids.html
Where does immune system degradation data come from? I couldn’t see this exists in the given link (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1018416/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_37_v2.pdf)
Ah: Now I see why everyone is asking where do the percentages come from! The fake fact checkers are at it again. The formula for the percentages is at the top of column 10, the column containing the percentages. It is the same formula that all the newspapers which own the fact chekcing sites quoted to represent that the vaccines were 94% and 95% efficient. It is a normalised absolute ratio of the vaxxed and unvaxxed case numbers.
Column 10 = (Column 9 – Column 8)/Column 9 if positive (U>V)
Column 10 = (Column 9 – Column 8)/Column 8 if negative (V>U)
Not satified with failing to publish the immonological ramifications of the latest PHE data or even the latest data itself, they add to their cover up by slandering those who do. Find a mainstream newspaper which even publishes the one trivial and vaguely immunological conclusion drawn in the Vaccine Surveillance Report for week41 which said..
“In individuals aged greater than 30, the rate of positive COVID-19 test is higher in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated”. – PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 41.
No MSM newspaper will publish that statement because that one line completely destroys the basis for vaccine passports.
Thank you so much for all of your invaluable hard work. I have been sharing this article far and wide alongside another to help people boost their natural immunity. The supplements mentioned in this article are what the ‘compliant’ and non-compliant need to take to boost natural immunity this winter… https://www.wilddigital.co.uk/mast-cell-activation-syndrome-essential-oils/
Exactly how are they determining that the immune system is deteriorating? Has there been a study done? What is the study? Who is conducting the study. These graphs are nice, but I could make these too if I wanted. This is scary stuff to put out without any “proof”. I would love to read the what yests they did to determine this.
The fact that the PHE statistics paint an entirely different picture from that in the PHE text is itself a major cause for concern.
The updated version of this Exposé article is well worth looking at, and especially the comments by Lords Witnesses.
https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/15/its-worse-than-we-thought-fully-covid-vaccinated-ade/
Roxane
Pls tell your profession.
great work as always plz keep it up Im a sub but will contribute more soon.
As some commentators have pointed out, the conclusion of this article is very weakly (if at all) supported by the raw data. For one thing, the authors are working solely off infection rates, comparing between vaxed and unvaxed, and infection (based, presumably on a positive covid test) does not demonstrate a failing immune system. For another, the other metrics of emergency care admittance and death numbers clearly show that the vaxed are protected (very significantly) against serious adverse outcomes.
I have had some respect for this website in the past, but am now questioning its credibility.
Perhaps, in the future, we will know of the immune depleting effects of the vax. But this article does not support that conclusion at all (and the more it is cited, i fear, the more vax-cautious folks will be regarded as kooks-with good reason.)
“the other metrics of emergency care admittance and death numbers clearly show that the vaxed are protected (very significantly) against serious adverse outcomes”
If that is correct, why is all cause mortality at least as high in the vaxxed as in the unvaxxed?
https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/2021/09/all-cause-mortality-rates-in-england.html
You have nailed it Gary. Thank you so much. The ONS all cause mortality rates are the same for vaccinated as unvaccinated. So It is the mortaility rates from PHE (which are 3x to 6x larger for the unvaxxed) which are incorrect not the case rates which are much more difficult to rig being way larger and being from genetic sequencing labs..
Well i would rather trust my body over the Chinese and USA funded labs it really is that simple..have the gene theraphy if that is the right course of action for you ..good luck. .its that simple
Not to mention all the first hand video testimony of departing nurses who won;t take the clot shots. They are all over rumble and bitchute telling the world the bulk of those in the ICUs are VaXXed.
The PHE figures are for genetical sequenced Delta. They are not from PCR tests. That is why they are so consistent and so accurate. Had they been PCR results they would have been all over the place. You argue that one set of PHE figures (death and admissions) clearly show protection and the other set (genetically sequenced delta cases) do not support the conclusion of less imumne system protection. Then you add a last line of slander which invalidates your objectivity entirely.
Fauci confirmed 2 months ago that viral loads were the same in the vaxxed as they were in the unvaxxed – fropm the Barnstable study in Mass. That means deaths should be the same. In fact deaths were the same in the PHE figures in late June just before Fauci made his statement. Then as the vaccines became less effective week on week thereafter, their death rates improved?!?! Go Figure.
First of all, everything that comes from Fauci’s mouth has to be dismissed, as that man, Kary Mullis already warned against him, is a fraud! If viral load is same in Un/Vaxxed their situation is very different. The Hospitalisation/Deathrate in vaxxed is much higher and growing ( see Israel f.e.) and that proves UnVaxxed can fight of Covid, as their immunesystems work better. Sweden (Scandinavia opened up completely) states Covid is comparable with heavy Flu strain in deathrates! But now we know Covid vaccines do not work…still vaxxed are treated first class and still spread Covid, even more! Covid Passports are only there for QR codes to serve Totalitarian Control and divide the people!
Romania stopped all vaxxsins – the people erupted in cheer – see bitchute.
Get over to GETTR!!!!
OMG. And, still people won’t stand against this genocide. They will stand by and allow their children to be dragged into this yet. What does it take to wake people up?
At the moment keep reading … no long term 5+ year data to see the final outcome and no immediate benefit as the vaxx does not prevent infection and transmission to warrant taking it. I have had the T-cell test to determine I have had the virus and that was positive so being recovered now best to wait. Probably take the test again in 1 year too see.
This was predicted by the science that’s been censored.
Get rid of the pop-ups for gods’ sakes.
when you know
People over 30 and over 40 get standard less ill then kids.Before any vaccination,but that is in Holland,so not know where what country your inverstigation started.Probobly in a country where all people are already not healthy before any vaccination.
This is a lie, not a single report contains such data
I can’t find any data on this either.
Looks like someone didn’t understand the graphs at all.
Those tables show the weekly cases and hospitalizations of people. Yes, in some points there are a bigger number of cases in the group of vaccinated people than unvaccinated people. That percentage difference between those two groups DOES *NOT* mean that their ENTIRE IMMUNE SYSTEM HAD DEGRADED BY THE PERCENTAGE DIFFERENCE let alone that their entire immune system against everything would be degrading by that percentage weekly.
That claim is absolutely laughable and absurd and seems like a knee-jerk assumption made by a pre-schooler. The worst misinterpretation of a graph I’ve seen.
Sure, it does show that the vaccines are not working perfectly to prevent infections. That I fully agree with. It sucks to see how it’s not actually managing to give very good coverage. Even if the chart description says that many vaccinated people are those who were prioritized to get the vaccine, because they are more at risk of getting a severe infection, as well as all workers got vaccines first – for example, hospital workers like my sister were among the very firsts.
Does that mean anyone can interpret information dependent on their view ??
Yeah, the vaccines are rubbish.
But I can’t see how they came to these conclusions.
Did they post the right documents?
Could they have been swapped out by the source after the expose source done their original analysis?
This could totally occur, but without a doubt this does make the expose look bad.
The results highlighted
>Yes, in some points there are a bigger number of cases in the group of vaccinated people
Could be because vaccinated people are being more careless in their interactions. I’m not drawing any conclusion, just offering alternative explanations.
Do you all know that Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome is the name for AIDS? What kind of reporting is this? What does any of the Covid shot have to do with AIDS? Just wondering how this all fits together.
Very interesting, check Kary Mullis’s view and follow the money.!! Big buisness low moral standards.
There is a video of a doctor/researcher who worked with a male patient that had diabetes who managed to help his patient become diabetes free after changing his diet and proper exercise.
The male patient required getting the vax for his work so the doctor asked him to do an immune system blood test both before he had his first jab and then also post jab.
The doctor was freaked out and explained what had happened after the first jab. He shows the pre test results and then the post test. the pre-test results showed the patients T cells and other stats were all good. the post test showed that his T cells had literally tanked (dramatically reduced} which he said that there would have to be inflammation occurring somewhere in his body for the levels of T cells to tank so much. It shocked him and he was seriously concerned. The blood test was literally termed as an AIDs test. I believe it to be an autoimmunity test. The doctor paid for the second test himself as part of his research. He actually shows both test results.
Sorry the T cells are your body’s first line of defense to attack foreign invading marauder cells, called “Killer T Cells”. I am not a doctor but this is how the doc sort of explains it.
Agree, the majority of patients in my hospital are double vaxed!
I as an ex Kiwi now 24 year Aussie RN, am infuriated with what these mongrels are doing to our Aboriginal men woman and children, these are the owners of our land and they need our help really bloody soon NOW right now. Come on Aussies, lets stand up and defend our fellow Australians. They have suffered enough for long enough. In my experience all Governments I have witnessed since 1997 have treated them like shit. Its enough, times up, We ALL Australians must defend our Black fella Brothers and Sisters NOW lets go…