---

Over the weekend, the University of Warwick concluded its Warwick Economics Summit. On the second day, 3 February, the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) Dictator-General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, joined the Summit via Zoom to push the Pandemic Treaty.

“It’s urgent [ ] that all of us learn the painful lessons the [covid] pandemic told us and make the changes that must be made to keep all of us safer. It’s for that reason that in December 2022 WHO’s member states met in Geneva and agreed to develop an international agreement on pandemic preparedness and response,” he said.

Tedros the Terrorist’s speech was an appalling attempt to manipulate young minds and use them to fight his battles, Tedros called on students to raise their voices “to counter the lies that are undermining the [pandemic] agreement on social media.”

A student introduced Tedros as someone who has “overseen the international response to some of the biggest public health crises of the modern era including the Ebola epidemic and the more recent covid-19 pandemic.” If the student had conducted any research, he would have known Tedros’ “handling” of previous public health crises was criminal and not complementary.

The introduction continued: Before his appointment at WHO he served in Ethiopia’s federal government both as Minister of Health and of Foreign Affairs, “and has held various leadership positions in global health leading the fight against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria.”

(Related: The Life and Times of WHO’s Director General as Ethiopian Terrorist and human rights abuser and AIDS – The True Story)

Tedros the Terrorist began his speech by putting the fear of several “catastrophes” into the attendees. “Our world is at a very dangerous juncture: conflict and insecurity, political division, geopolitical tension, inflation and increasing poverty, narrow nationalism and the overshadowing climate crisis.”

The covid pandemic, Tedros claimed, exposed “serious gaps in the world’s defences against health emergencies.  “There was inadequate governance, insufficient and unpredictable financing, systemic inequalities and lack of transparency rampant misinformation and a failure of global solidarity in the face of a common threat,” he said.

(Related: Dr Cover-up: Tedros Adhanom’s controversial journey to the WHO)

He then praised the work done by the unsafe and ineffective covid vaccine developers and distributors: “There were also successes; the development of vaccines in record time was a triumph of science and through COVAX, those vaccines reach the world’s poorest and most vulnerable faster than they would have otherwise.”

Bill Gates’ GAVI launched the COVAX Facility in June 2020.  COVAX was a partnership with WHO, UNICEF and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness (“CEPI”). COVAX was the vaccine pillar of the Access to Covid-19 Tools (ACT) Accelerator.

(Related: WHO, Bill Gates and Wellcome Trust’s Global Vaccine Fund Lacks Transparency and Accountability and Wellcome Leap Teams Up with CEPI For RNA Readiness and Response Part 1, Part 2)

“History teaches us that the next pandemic is a matter of when not if.  It may be caused by an influenza virus or a new coronavirus or it may be caused by a new pathogen we don’t even know about yet, which is what we refer to as disease X,” Tedros said and boasted of WHO’s R&D Blueprint report which was published in 2018.  It was the first time WHO used the term “disease X,” Tedros told the Warwick Economics Summit.

Coronaviruses are the cause of about 20% of seasonal colds. There are more than 30 kinds of coronaviruses, but only three or four affect people, according to WebMD.

There was no coronavirus pandemic in 2020, although we could argue there has been a pandemic of the vaccinated since the mass covid injection campaigns began. 

At the end of last month as part of a longer comment, Dr. Mike Yeadon posted on his Telegram channel: “Pandemics are not a thing. Think back through your life. How many pandemics have there been? Covid wasn’t one. The Spanish flu nonsense wasn’t one. None of the flu-like illnesses reported in the 1960s were one. I don’t believe there has ever been even one.”

Further reading:

• No Pandemic Australia: If You Believe There Was Then You Need to Ask Why Its Deadly Effect Doubled After the Covid “Vaccine” Roll-Out
• Death Rates Are Higher After Mass Vaccinations, An Analysis of Worldwide Data Reveals
• Dr. Judy Mikovits: Since 1980, all viruses are bioweapons that have been created in laboratories
• Prof. Dolores Cahill: We Are Witnessing the Rollout of Agenda 21’s Depopulation and Undermining of Society
• Hypothetical “Disease X”: The WHO Pandemic Treaty Is a Fraud. Demands Compliance for “Next Pandemic”

The R&D Blueprint “identified a group of priority pathogens with epidemic and pandemic potential for which there were no effective vaccines, tests or treatments that included SARS, MERS, Ebola, Marburg and others,” Tedros, an Ethiopian suspected of genocide, told the Summit.

According to WHO’s website: “As part of WHO’s response to the covid-19 outbreak, the R&D Blueprint has been activated to accelerate diagnostics, vaccines and therapeutics to combat this novel coronavirus. WHO Member States welcomed the development of the Blueprint at the World Health Assembly in May 2016.”

“[In the Blueprint,] we also recognised the need for research capacities to respond rapidly to a new pathogen that hadn’t been seen before; we call that unknown pathogen disease X, it was, if you like, a placeholder for a new disease we don’t know about yet. Covid-19 was a disease X a new pathogen causing a new disease but there will likely be another disease X or a disease Y or Z,” Tedros said.

The reason Tedros was telling the students all of this was to promote the “urgent need” for a Pandemic Treaty, Agreement or Accord – the name of it has been changing over time. 

“It’s urgent therefore that all of us learn the painful lessons the pandemic told us and make the changes that must be made to keep all of us safer. It’s for that reason that in December 2022 WHO’s member states met in Geneva and agreed to develop an international agreement on pandemic preparedness and response. The pandemic agreement will be international law a legally binding pact between countries to work together to make the world safer against future pandemics,” he said.

At this point, Tedros the Terrorist’s Zoom feed should have been cut off for the health and well-being of all students and the public at large.  If you’re still not feeling sure why, read the comments posted under WHO’s tweet publicising his speech.

We must confess, we didn’t listen to the remainder of his monotone or the question-and-answer session that followed.  The first five minutes were sufficiently incriminating and thereafter we simply skimmed through the transcript.  You can watch the full session below.

United Nations’ Common Future

“Failure to finalise the agreement will be a missed opportunity for which future generations may not forgive us,” Tedros told the students. He pressed this notion more than once and called on young people to raise their voices “to counter the lies that are undermining the [pandemic] agreement on social media”.

In an overt display of desperation, unelected globalist and WHO head, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, calls on young people to raise their voices "to counter the lies that are undermining the [pandemic] agreement on social media".

"We cannot allow this historic agreement, this… pic.twitter.com/TySR7RUOPg

— Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) February 3, 2024

The phrase “future generations may not forgive us” seems to have become Tedros’ new mantra.  For example, two weeks ago, The Guardian reported that Tedros warned that the global pandemic agreement was at risk of falling apart. The accord, or Pandemic Treaty, aimed at preventing another health catastrophe, is losing momentum due to “lies and conspiracy theories,” The Guardian wrote. 

“Time is very short. And there are several outstanding issues that remain to be resolved.  Failure to strike an agreement would be “a missed opportunity for which future generations may not forgive us”, he told the WHO’s executive board in Geneva on 22 January 2024. “We cannot allow this historic agreement, this milestone in global health, to be sabotaged.”

Created in 1948, WHO is an agency of the United Nations. Later in his Warwick Economics Summit speech, at timestamp 13:45, he promoted the United Nations’ ambitions of becoming the One World Government.

“We have no future but common future,” Tedros said.  “It just makes sense for countries to work together on a common threat. After all, that’s what the United Nations is; nations uniting to find common solutions to common problems.”

Tedros’ rhetoric of “common” or “global” crises and solutions is not new.  In a 2009 article, The Telegraph wrote:

There can be little doubt which word won the prize for most important adjective. 2009 was the year in which “global” swept the rest of the political lexicon into obscurity. There were “global crises” and “global challenges”, the only possible resolution to which lay in “global solutions” necessitating “global agreements.”

The dangerous idea that the democratic accountability of national governments should simply be dispensed with in favour of “global agreements” reached after closed negotiations between world leaders never, so far as I recall, entered into the arena of public discussion.

The word “global” has taken on sacred connotations. Any action taken in its name must be inherently virtuous, whereas the decisions of individual countries are necessarily “narrow” and self-serving.

There is a whiff of totalitarianism about this new theology, in which the risks are described in such cosmic terms that everything else must give way. “Globalism” is another form of the internationalism that has been a core belief of the Left.

If the EU model is anything to go by, then the agencies of global authority will involve vast tracts of power being handed to unelected officials. Forget the relatively petty irritations of Euro‑bureaucracy: welcome to the era of Earth-bureaucracy, when there will be literally nowhere to run.

There’ll be nowhere to run from the new world government, The Telegraph, 19 December 2009

To demonstrate how democratic accountability of national governments is dispensed with in favour of “global agreements” reached after closed negotiations, we use the example below of the insertion of the climate change agenda into the United Nation’s Brundtland Report in the 1980s.

Speaking to Ivor Cummins last year, Jacob Nordangård said that while he was researching the background to the Brundtland Report – which is also known as ‘Our Common Future’ – published in October 1987 by the United Nations, he discovered a Rockefeller Brothers Fund’s (“RBF’s”) project in the early 1980s called the ‘One World Programme’.

According to RBF’s website: “One World was a response to the global situation, which the committee observed had become dangerously nationalistic, isolationist, heavily armed, and destructive of natural resources.”

“During [the 1980s the RBF] had discussions on ‘how can we put climate in this new Brundtland Commission report … how do we do it?’,” Nordangård explained. “They gave money to a couple of organisations: Environmental Defence Fund, World Resource Institute and Woods Hole Institution, I think, and also they gave money directly to the Brundtland Commission. And then they state: ‘We want climate change to be part of this report’.”

The Beijer Institute’s President Gordon Goodman was invited to write a report on energy for the Brundtland Commission.  Goodman was another of those who accepted money from RBF.  “And in [Goodman’s] report that is put into the Brundtland Commission’s final report, [Goodman] puts in the climate change agenda,” Nordangård said. “And the money comes from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund to do this.”

Further reading:

• Dr. Jacob Nordangård: ‘UN, WEF and G20 form the Troika of Global Governance’
• Video: The Greatest History Never Told, Ivor Cummins interview with Jacob Nordangård, 24 June 2023
• Brundtland Report on The Exposé
• Common Purpose – The deeply sinister organisation with thousands of operatives in positions of power & influence in the UK
• Common Good on The Exposé
• Common Purpose on UK Column